Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1961 )


Menu:
  •                     THEATTORNEY               GENERAL
    OF-TEXAS
    Ausnlv    .a*.
    TEXAS
    WI&      WILSON
    ATTORNEY     OENERAL
    March 29, 1961
    Honorable Charles A. Allen         Opinion No. NW-1029
    Criminal District Attorney
    Harrison County                    Re': Whether, under
    . . the man-
    1 >
    aatory provisions of the
    P. 0. Box $949
    Marshall, Texas                         Harrison County Road Law,
    the Commissioners' Court
    of Harrison County, Texas,
    is required to employ and
    have in Its constant em-
    ploy a "registered profes-
    Dear Mr. Allen:                         sional" civil engineer?
    lettersof March 7, 1961, you request the
    In your __.
    opinion of this office on the following question:
    "Under the mandatory provisions of the
    Harrison County Road Law is the Commlssion-
    ers' Court of Harrison County, Texas requir-
    ed to employ and have In its constant employ
    a 'registered professional' civil engineer?"
    In Opinion No. V-1407, to which we adhere, this
    office expressed the opinion that:
    "House Bill No. 812, Acts 42nd Leg.,
    Special Laws R.S. 1931, ch. 156, p. 303
    (Harrison County Road Law), makes It manda-
    tory for the commissioners' court of
    Harrison County to employ a county engineer
    and to have a county engineer in constant
    employment with Harrison County."
    Section 4 of House Bill No. 812, Acts 42nd Lee;.,
    Special Laws, R.S. 1931, ch. 156, p. 303 requires that 'Said
    County Engineer shall be a qualified Civil Engineer and a
    resident of the State of Texas; . . . ' The question thus
    evolves : Must the "qualified Civil Engineer" required by
    Section 4 be a "registered professional" civil engineer?
    Honorable Charles A. Allen, Page 2 (w-1029)
    The duties of the county engineer are set forth in
    Sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Harrison County Road Law, provid-
    ing in part as follows:
    "Sec. 2. The Commissloners~ Court
    of Harrison County is hereby authorized and
    empowered to employ a County Engineer, whose
    duties, compensation and liabilities shall be
    such as are imposed by this Act. The said
    County Engineer shall devote his entire time
    to the construction and maintenance of the
    county roads.
    "Sec. 3. That said County Engineer
    shall be appointed by the Commissioners'
    Court of said county within ninety (90) days
    after the nassage of this Act at a Regular
    Meeting or-Called Session thereof. That he
    shall have charge of all public road con-
    struction and public road maintenance, to-
    gether with the building of bridges and cul-
    verts, in his County except as is otherwise
    herein expressly provided. . . .
    “Sec. 4. Said County Engineer shall
    be a qualified Civil Engineer and a resident
    of the State of Texas; . . . That said County
    Engineer shall subject to the orders of the
    Commissioners' Court, have general supervision
    over the construction and maintenance of all
    public roads and highways of his county, toget-
    her with the building of bridges and culverts;
    he shall superintend the laying out of new
    roads subject to the orders of the Commissioners'
    Court, and shall forthwith make or cause to be
    made a road map of the county showing the loca-
    tion, mileage, and classification of the dif-
    ferent roads and highways in said county, . . .'
    (Emphasis added throughout)
    The pertinent sections of Article 3271a, Vernon's
    Civil Statutes, defining and regulating the practice of pro-
    fessional engineering in the State of Texas, provide in part:
    "Section 1. That In order to safeguard
    life, health, and property, any person prac-
    ticing or offering to practice the profession
    Honorable Charles A. Allen, Page 3 (WW-1029)
    of engineering as hereinafter defined shall
    hereafter be required to submit evidence that
    he is qualified so to practice and shall be
    registered as hereinafter provided; and it
    shall be unlawful for any person to practice
    or offer to practice the profession of engi-
    neering In this State, . . . unless such
    person has been duly registered or exempted
    under the provisions of this Act.
    "DEFINITIONS
    "Sec. 2. The term professional engineer
    as used in this Act shall mean a person who,
    by reason of his knowledge of mathematics, the
    physical sciences, and the principles of en-
    gineering, acquired by professional education
    and practical experience, Is qualified to en-
    gage in engineering practice as hereinafter
    defined.
    'The practice of professional engineering
    within the meaning and Intent of this Act in-
    cludes any professional service, such as con-
    sultation, investigation, evaluation, planning,
    designing, or responsible supervision of con-
    struction in connection with any public or pri-
    vate utilities, structures, bulldlnsts.machines.
    equipment, processes, works, or projects, where:
    in the public welfare, or the safeguarding of
    life, health or property is concerned or involv-
    ed, when such professional service requires the
    application of engineering principles and lnter-
    pretation of engineering data.
    ,t
    . . .
    "Sec. 19.   After the first day of January,
    1938, it shall be unlawful for this State, or
    for any of its nolltlcal subdivisions. for any
    county; city, or town, to engage in the con-
    struction of any public work involving pro-
    fessional engineering, where public health,
    public welfare or public safety is involved,
    unless the engineering plans and specifica-
    tions and estimates have been prepared by,
    Honorable Charles A. Allen, Page 4 (WW-1029)
    and the engineering construction is to
    be executed under the direct supervision
    f a registered professional engineer;
    zrovided that nothingln~ &isAct shall
    be held io apply to any public work where-
    in the contemplated expenditure for the
    completed reject does not exceed Three
    Thousand ($ 3,OOO.OO) Dollars. Provided,
    that this Act shall not apply to any road
    maintenance or betterment work undertaken
    by the County Commissioners' Court."
    (Fmphasis added throughout)
    The term, "public works" is defined In Volume
    34 of Texas Jurisprudence at page 731, as embracing "all
    constructlorsand improvements--ordinarily of a fixed
    nature--designed for public use, protection or enjoyment.
    Clearly included among public works are bridges, school
    buildings, waterworks, dams, sewers, canals and channels,
    levees and seawalls, wharves and piers, irrigation, re-
    clamation and drainage projects, and highways and streets.
    Indeed, every work undertaken by the State, a county,
    municipality, or other public agency Is necessarily, in
    the broadest sense, a 'public work.'" The term "public
    welfare" is defined as "the prosperity, well-being, or
    convenience of the public at large, or of a whole community,
    as distinguished from the advantage of an individual or
    limited class." Black's Law Dictionary.
    It is the opinion of this office that the duties
    imposed upon the county engineer by the Harrison County
    Road Law are encompassed by the definition of the practice
    of professional engineering contained In Section 2 of Article
    3271a.
    In response to a request from the County Auditor
    of Harrison County, relative to the authority of the Commls-
    sioners Court to appoint a person not possessing the qualifl-
    cations of a "professional engineer" as a superintendent of
    maintenance and construction of county roads and other public
    works, this office expressed the following opinion:
    "It is the opinion of this department,
    under the facts stated, that Section 
    19, supra
    , does not prohibit the Commissioners'
    Court from appointing a person not possess-
    ing the qualifications of an engineer as
    Honorable Charles A. Allen, Page 5 (WW-1029)
    defined In Article 327la, V. A. C. S.,
    as a superintendent In the construction
    of public works where the contemplated
    expenditure for the completed project
    does not exceed $3,000.00; nor does said
    section prohibit the Commissioners' Court
    from appointing such a person to super-
    vise any road maintenance or road better-
    ment work undertaken by the county Commls-
    sioners' Court.
    "Where, however, the county Commis-
    sioners' Court engages in the construction
    of public works wherein the contemplated
    expenditure for the completed project ex-
    ceeds $3,000.00, and such work involves
    public health, public welfare or public
    safety, and also involves professional
    engineering, it is the opinion of this de-
    partment that, while a non-engineer could
    be appointed as general supervisor of such
    construction, Section 19 requires the
    county to employ a registered professional
    engineer to prepare the engineering plans
    and specifications and estimates, and the
    engineering construction, likewise, must be
    executed under the direct supervision of
    such engineer.
    "Whether the construction of a parti-
    cular public work involves 'professional
    engineering' and whether 'public health,
    public welfare or public safety' Is involv-
    ed, are questions of fact, and consequently
    not subject to being ruled on by this
    department."
    Copies of this opinion, No. o-3505, and of Opinion No. V-1407
    are enclosed for your information.
    SUMMARY
    Under the mandatory provisions of the
    Harrison County Road Law and the pro-
    visions of Article 327la, Vernon's Civil
    Honorable Charles A. Allen, Page 6 (NW-1029)
    Statutes, the Commissioners Court of
    Harrison County, Texas, is required
    to employ and have In Its constant em-
    ploy a "registered professional" civil
    engineer.
    Very truly yours,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    J+&A&-yd.b
    BY
    Dudley D. McCalla
    Assistant
    DDM:hmc
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Jack N. Price
    John Reeves
    L. P. Lollar
    John Leonarz
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY:   Morgan Nesbltt
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1029

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1961

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017