Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1961 )


Menu:
  • __   -   -
    -E        ATTORNEY       GENERAL
    OFTEXAS
    March 8, 1961
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert      Opinion No. wW-1000
    Comptroller of Public Accounts
    Capitol Station                  Re:   Deduzctlbilityof the
    Austin, Texas                          comn&sions of sn
    executor or an adminis-
    trator for inheritance
    Dear Mr. Calvert:                      tax purposes.
    We quote the following excerpt from your letter requesting
    our opinion on the above captioned matter.
    "We desire the opinion of your office
    with respect to the proper handling of
    claimed deductions for the fees of an
    executor/administrator for inheritance.
    tax purposes.
    "For the past twenty-five years, this
    department has disallowed fees claimed
    by an executor or administrator when the
    executor or administrator was the sole
    heir or legatee of an estate, because
    these fees did not pass out of the estate.
    However, it has been our policy to allow
    these fees when either the executor or
    administrator was not an heir or legatee
    of an estate, because the heirs or legatees
    received the estate minus the fees of the
    executor/administrator.
    "Since Article 14.10, Chapter 14, Tile
    122A, does not provide for a deduction of
    this nature, we wish to be advised whether
    or not our policy is correct."
    The pertinent provisions of Article 14.10, Chapter 14,
    Title 122A, 20A, Taxation-General, Vernon's Annotated Texas
    Statutes, are the following:
    "The only deductions permissible under
    this law are the debts due by the estate,
    fun&expenses,   expenses incident to the
    last illness of the deceased, which shall
    -   .   ..,
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 2     Opinion No. WW-1000
    be due and unpaid at the time of death,
    all Federal, State, County, and Municipal
    taxes due at the time of the death of the
    decedent, attorney's fees and Court costs
    accruing in connection with the assessing
    and collecting of the taxes provided for
    under this Chapter, . . . A full state-
    ment of facts authorizing deductions must
    be made in duplicate under oath by the
    executor, administrator, or trustee, and
    one copy filed with the county clerk and
    the other with the Comptroller, before any
    deductions will be allowed."
    We think that Article 14.09, Ch. 14, Tit. 122A, 20A,
    Tax.-Gen., V.A.T.S., must also be considered in determining
    sn answer to the question presented. This article reads as
    follows:
    "If a testator bequeaths or devises to
    his executor or trustee, property In lieu
    of commission, the value of such property
    in excess of reasonable compensation, as
    determined by the county judge and the
    Comptroller, shall be subject to taxation
    under this Chapter."
    We recognize at the outset that Article 14.10, formerly
    Article 7125, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, listing
    permissible deductions in determining the amount due the
    State as inheritance taxes is one of limitation and that our
    courts have so held. Walker v. Mann, 
    143 S.W.2d 152
    (Civ.App.
    1940, error ref.). Clearly the fees or commissions of an
    executor or administrator are not among the enumerated allow-
    able deductions, However, we think that your policy in
    allowing these fees as a deduction when either the executor
    or administrator was not an heir or legatee of the estate
    has been correct. We quote the following excerpt from an
    snnotation in 92A.L.R. entitled "Deduction of Commissions
    of Executors, Auministrators or Trustees in Computing Succes-
    sion or Estate Tax" at pages 537, 538:
    "One of the items universally recognized
    as a proper deduction In the computation of
    succession and estate taxes is the expense
    of administering on the estate. Ordinarily,
    the statute imposing the tax expressly pro-
    vides for this deduction. Where not expressly
    provided for--as under some of the earlier
    New York statutes--the deduction has been
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 3               Opinion No. WW-1000
    allowed by the courts upon the ground
    that the tax is only upon the amount of
    the assets actually passing to the heir
    or legatee, and therefore necessarily
    excludes such of the assets as are used
    to pay administration expenses.
    "That commissions of an executor or
    administrator are an 'expense of adminis-
    tration' is too obvious to require citation
    of authority. As said in the reported case
    SCOTT V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
    IC.C.A. 8th) ante, 531): *Obviously,
    commissions allowable and paid to executors
    under the laws of the state of administration
    are administration expenses.'
    "It follows, therefore, that commissions
    of an executor or administrator must be
    allowed as a deduction in determing the net
    estate subject to a succession or estate
    tax. This rule may be said to be supported
    by all of the cases cited in the present
    annotation. The rule being universally
    recognized, it remains only to discuss such
    questions as arise out of its application
    in particular cases, such as questions relating
    to the computation of the commissions, the
    particular kind of commissions Included with-
    in the rule, etc. . .w
    ';f 'b%?Z% -Vd%-i8-tilI$
    ~tR%+u*~-Vh ?fb +cV I-v?&aSJUKb2fL%% 'tf,+&h
    conclusion, and we think there is none, all doubts would be
    resolved by the provisions of Article 14.09 above quoted. In
    expressly providing that in those instances in which a testator
    bequeathed or devised to his executor or trustee property in
    lieu of a commission only the value of such property in excess
    of reasonable compensation would be subject to an inheritance
    tax, the Legislature, by Implication, has recognized that in
    other cases such commissions will be deducted before computing
    the inheritance taxes due the State. See cases cited in 92
    
    A.L.R., supra
    , 549..
    We pass now to a consideration of whether your department
    has been correct In disallowing commissions claimed by an
    executor or administrator when the executor or administrator
    was the sole legatee or heir of an estate. We have concluded
    that the fact that an executor or an administrator is the sole
    beneficiary or heir doesnot, of itself, constitute a reason
    ---
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 4           Opinion No. WW-1000
    for refusing to allow a deduction for commissions. In such cases,
    the commissions are allowed as compensation for services rendered
    and are received as such, rather than as a devise or bequest or
    an inheritance from the decedent.
    Numerous problems may arise in connection with the allowance
    of an executorls or administrator's commissions as deductions.
    Although you have not specifically requested our opinion as to
    these problems, we think that we should call a few of them to your
    attention since, although the result we have reached may be said
    to be the general rule and that usually ~the full amount of such
    commissions are deductibile, this rule cannot be universally
    applied. For example, since in Texas the entire community estate
    is liable for the debts of the husband and is subject to adminis-
    tration by his executor, the amount of commissions which may be
    deducted will vary with the facts of each case. Another case
    presenting special problems would be that in which the debts and
    expenses exceed the probate estate as, for example, where the
    decedent has exercised a power of appointment or made a transfer
    in trust reserving a life interest, or made a transfer in con-
    templation of death. Special deduction problems might arise in
    thosecases in which Texas is the domiciliary state but adminis-
    tration expenses are incurred, not only in connection with the
    Texas estate, but also in connection with assets located and
    administered in another state or states.
    The foregoing examples do not encompass all the possible
    situations in which the general rule as to the deductibility
    of the commissions of an executor or an administrator would not
    be followed. We mention them as an example of the questions which
    may arise in the administration of our inheritance tax statutes.
    If and when such questions do arise, you may properly request an
    opinion of this office on the particular fact situation involved.
    SUMMARY
    The general rule is that the com-
    missions of an executor or sn adminis-
    trator should be allowed as a deduction in
    computing the inheritance taxes due the
    State even if the executor or administrator
    is the sole heir or legatee; however, this
    general rule is subject to qualification
    under various fact situations,
    Yours very truly,
    -_._   .--.
    INION COMMITTEE:                  WILL WILSON
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman             Attorney General of Texas
    Grundy Willisms
    Martin Destefano
    W. Ray Scruggs
    R&VIgWED FOR THEAT'I'ORNEYGENERAL
    By: Morgan i$esbitt
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1000

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1961

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017