Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1960 )


Menu:
  •                     THEAYTOFXNEY                GENERAL
    OFTEXAS
    AUSTIN    ``.TExAs
    WILL     WILSON
    ATFORNEY     C4ENERAI.
    June 15, 1960
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert            Opinion No. WW-855
    Comptroller of Public Accounts
    Capitol Station                        Re:    Interpretation and
    Austin, Texas                                 administration of Art.
    19.01(T), Title 122A,
    R.C.S.,,imposing an occupa-
    tion tax and other duties
    Dear Mr. Calvert:                             upon dealers in pistols.
    Your recent request for an opinion of this Officescontains
    several questionsrelating to Article 19.01(T), Title 122A,
    R.C.S., which we here set out in part:
    "(7) Tax on Dealers in Pistols. There
    shall be collected from every person,
    firm or corporation engaging in the
    business of bartering, leasing, selling,
    exchanging, or otherwise dealing in
    pistols for profit, whether by wholesale
    or retail, an annual occupation tax of
    Ten Dollars ($10) to be paid on or before
    January 1st of each year, and to be paid
    before continuing said business. Before
    engaging in said business, each such
    dealer shall obtain a license therefor,
    to be issued by the County Tax Collector
    of each county in which the applicant has
    a place of business, and for each separate
    place of business. The Comptroller of
    Public Accounts shall furnish said forms
    to the Tax Collectors."
    The three questions under paragraph 1 of your letter are
    interrelated,and we will therefore discuss them together.
    We set them out as follows:
    "(a) Do you interpret this article as
    requiring a dealer in pistols to first pay
    to the Comptroller of Public Accounts an
    annual occupation tax of Ten Dollars?
    "(b) Before engaging in said business,
    must a dealer in pistols obtain a license
    from the County Tax Collector to engage in
    that business?
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 2   Opinion NO. ``-855
    "(c) If the answer to (a) and (b) above
    is in the affirmative, what fee, if any, is
    due the Count! Tax Collector for issuing
    such license?
    It is our opinion that a dealer must (a) pay the $10.00
    occupation tax and (b) obtain a license from the County Tax
    Collector before engaging in this business. It is our further
    opinion that (c) no fee is due the County Tax Collector for
    issuing such license.
    Some of the wording of this subdivision of Art. lg.01 is
    rather obscure, probably due in part to its having been taken,
    with minor change, from the previously existing Art. 70478,
    V.C.S., which assessed the same tax and imposed the same
    duties upon dealers in pistols. The phrase ". . . and to be
    paid before continuing said business,,. . . ." was doub,tlessly
    inserted in the original act (coupled with the phrase
    within thirty (30) days from the effective date hereof"j to'
    insure its application to those dealers who were engaged in the
    business at the time of its passage, and hence would appear to
    be mere surplusage in the present Art. lg.Ol(7).
    The first paragraph of the subdivision does two things:
    it levies an occupation tax payable to the State for
    Erenue purposes and (2) it imposes a licensing requirement,
    presumably to asiist regulation and supervision of a potential~ly
    dangerous enterprise. See 27 Tex.Jur., Licenses, Sets. 45, 48.
    The occupation tax is levied by the first sentence of the
    subdivision. The second sentence imposes the 'licenserequire-
    ment as a prerequisite to engaging in the business. However,
    Art. lg.04 of the same chapter specifies that
    "No individual,'company, corporation
    or association, failing to pay all taxes
    imposed by this Chapter, shall receive
    a permit, when such is required, to do
    business in this State, or continue to do
    business in the State, until the tax hereby
    imposed is paid. The receipt of the State
    Treasurer shall be evidence of the payment
    of such tax, and such receipt shall be
    construed as a permit to do business when
    a separate permit is not otherwise required
    by law."
    We believe that the "license" required by Art. lg.Ol(7)
    is a "permit to do business" within the meaning of Art. 19.04.
    See 27 Tex.Jur., Licenses, sees. 1, 10, 48. Since issuance
    of the license is specifically made a condition precedent to
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 3   Opinion No. W-855
    engaging in the business of dealing in pistols, and since,
    under 19.04, no license can issue until the occupation tax is
    paid, it necessarily follows that the tax must be paid before
    pursuing the occupation.
    No fee may be collected by the Tax Collector for issuing
    the prescribed license, since none is provided by the Article.
    McCalla v. City of Rockdale, 
    112 Tex. 209
    , 
    246 S.W. 654
    (1922);
    Nueces County v. Currinnton 
    139 Tex. 299
    , 
    162 S.W.2d 687
    (Tex.
    Comm.App. 1942; Op. Adopted).
    Part 2 of your request reads as follows:
    "The question also has arisen as to the
    definition of a (pistol). Will you please
    give us a definition that we may use in
    administering this tax. Specifically, we
    would like to know if the following are
    classed as'pistols under this law:
    "When it is an instrument that is
    intended or designed to be aimed or fired
    from one hand ,fromwhjch a missile, dart,
    pellet or shot is expelled or discharged
    from;
    "(a) By power exerted by a rubber band.
    "(b) By power exerted by a spring.
    "(c) By power exerted by air pr,essure
    where one stroke of pump creates the
    maximum pressure.
    "(d) By power exerted by air pressure where
    it is compressed by repeated strokes
    of the pump.
    "(e) By power exerted by a cartridge of air
    or gasI commonly referred to as a Co2
    gun."
    It is our opinion that none of these items are "pistols"
    w~ithinthe meaning of the Article.
    We refer you to the definition of a pistol provided by
    Art. lg.Cl('i')(c),
    as follows:
    us``cj,er~.sntol
    defined. 'Pistol,'as
    > shall include every kind of
    I   .
    --   -
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 4    Opinion No. W-855
    pistol, revolver, automatic, semiautomatic,
    magazine pistol, and every other short
    firearm intended or designed to be aimed
    or fired from one hand."
    Note that following the en$meration of specific types
    of pistols there is the phrase      . and every other short
    firearm." The word "firearm" necessarily modifies the term
    "pistol". A firearm is ordinarily,defined as any weapon
    which discharges a shot by force of gunpowder. Harris v.
    Cameron, 
    81 Wis. 239
    ; 
    51 N.W. 437
    ; Atwood v. State, 
    53 Ala. 508
    . This would limit the scope of Art. 19.01(T) to include
    only "pistols" which are "firearms," as'defined above, thereby
    excluding all the items which you listed in your request
    from the operation of the Article.
    SUMMARY
    Art. 19.01(7), Title 122A, requires
    a dealer in pistols to pay the occupation
    tax levied and procure the license
    -. -required
    before engaging In business. The County
    Tax Collector may not charge a fee for
    issuing the license. The term "pistol"
    used in the Article refers only to "firearms"
    and items other than firearms are not included
    therein.
    Yours very truly,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    JRI:ctn
    APPROVED:
    OPlNION COMMITTEE:
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Wallace Finfrock
    J. Arthur Sandlin
    Fred B. Werkenthin
    Marietta McGregor Payne
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    By: Leonard Passmore
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-855

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1960

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017