Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1960 )


Menu:
  • .-   .
    EA        ORNEY            GENERAL
    OF      ?IrEns
    Ausnnr     1,. TEXAS
    WLL      WILSON
    ATTORNEYGENERAL                       May 2, 1960
    Honorable Cecil M. Pruett                        Opinion NO. ``-831
    County Attorney
    Hutchinson County                                Re:   Whether refusal by an.
    Borger, Texas                                          election judge to de-
    liver a ballot in the
    Democratic primary to
    a person who refuses to
    allow the judge to stamp
    "Democrat" on his poll
    tax receipt, as provided
    in Art. 13.01a of the
    Election Code, consti-
    tutes a violation of Art.
    Dear Mr. Pruett:                                       217 of the Penal Code.
    Your opinion request Involves an interpreation of Sub-
    section (4)(i) of Article la.Ola of Vernon's Texas Election Code
    (the "Party Affiliation Law enacted by the Texas Legislature in
    1959), which reads as follows:
    "Each voter shall present his poll tax receipt
    or exemption certificate, or an affidavit of its loss,
    to the election judge on the first time such voter
    participates in a primary election and the election
    judge shall stamp within the party affiliation space
    on the face of said poll tax receipt, exemption, or
    affidavit of loss, the words 'Democrat' or 'Republican'
    or other party primary vote connotation as the case may
    be and such stamped poll tax receipt, exemption, or af-
    fidavit of loss shall be the designation of a qualified
    member of that party; such qualified member of such party,
    having once voted within a party primary shall remain a
    qualified member,,ofthat party for the d-crationof the
    poll tax period.
    You have informed us that         various persons in your county
    have stated that they were going to         vote in the Democratic primary
    but would refuse to have their poll         tax receipt stamped "Democrat .
    In anticipation of this occurrence,         you have asked the following
    question:
    Does refusal of an election judge to deliver a
    ballot in the Democratic primary to a person or persons
    Honorable Cecil M. Pruett, page 2 (W-831)
    who refuse to allow the judge to stamp their poll tax
    receipt, exemption certificate, or affidavit of loss
    with the word "Democrat", as provided in Article 13.01a
    of the Election Code, constitute a violation of Article
    217 of the Penal Code?
    Article 217 of the Penal Code readsas   follows:
    "Art. 217.' Refusing to permit voter ,tovote.--Any
    judge of any election who shall refuse to receive the
    vote of any qualified elector who, when his vote is ob-
    jected to shows by his own oath that he is entitled to
    vote, or who shall refuse to deliver an official ballot
    to one entitled to vote under the law, or who shall wil-
    fully refuse to receive a ballot after one entitled to
    vote has legally folded and returned same, shall be fined
    not to exceed five hundred dollars." (Emphasis supplied.)
    In the light of the underscored portion of Article 217, your
    question may be restated as follows: Is a person entitled to vote in
    a Democratic primary if he refuses to allow the election judge to
    stamp "Demccrat" on his receipt or certificate?
    Before taking up this question, we should give some atten-
    tion to whether Article 217 of the Penal Code applies to primary elec-.
    tions. Article 217 is a part of Chapter 4 of Title 6 of the Penal Code.
    Various other articles in this chapter refer to "an election or pri-
    mary" (Art. 2161, "an election, either primary,,special or general"
    (Art. 218), 'any general cr primary election" IArt. 2?2)> while others
    use only the term "election" witho~stspecifically mentioning a primary
    election. However, any doubt as to applicability of Article 217 to
    primary elections is removed by Article 231 of the Penal Code, also
    a part of Chapter &,.which provides that the term 'elect,ion"as used
    in that chapter means "any election, either general, special, or pri-
    mary, held under authority of law within this State, or within any
    town, city, district, county, precinct, or any other subdivision with-
    in this State for any pcrpcse whatever."
    Returning to your question, Article 18.01a cf the Election
    Code provides that the voter shall present his poll tax receipt, exemp-
    tion certificate, or affidavit of loss, anl that the election judge
    shall stamp the party designation on the receipt, certificate or af-
    flit.    While statutory provisions stating that an act shall be done
    are sometimes construed to be discretionary or directory rather than
    mandatory, the ordinary meaning of the word "shall" is equivalent to
    "must" -- it is a mandatory term, requiring compliance. McLaren v.
    State 
    82 Tex. Crim. 449
    , 199 S.W; 811 (1917); Brinkley v. State, 32C
    S.W. 655 (Tex. Grim. 1959); Mitchell 'v.Ean,cock,lgb S.W. 694, 730
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1917); J&n&   s    !e, 3Ob S.W.2d 182 (Tex.Civ.App. 1957).
    Looking to the purposr and intent of Article l?.Cla, we are of the
    opinion that these provisions are mandatory. The requirement for
    .-   -
    Honorable Cecil M. Pruett, page 3 (W-831)
    stamping of the voter's party affiliation is not only for the purpose
    of furnishing him with evidence that he is qualified to participate
    in that party's conventions and to hold party offices, but also for
    the purpose of enabling other parties to determine that he is not
    eligible to participate in their conventions or to hold office in
    their party organization. These being mandatory provisions, a person
    who refuses to allow the primary election judge to stamp the party
    designation on his receipt, certificate, or affidavit is not entitled
    to vote in that primary, and the election judge therefore would not
    violate Article 217 by refusing to deliver a ballot to him. Accordingly,
    your question is answered in the negative.
    SUMMARY
    A person offering to vote in the Democratic pri-
    mary who refuses to allow the election judge to stamp
    "Democrat" in the party affiliation space on his poll
    tax receipt, exemption certificate, or affidavit of
    loss, is not entitled to vote in that election, and
    refusal of the election judge to deliver a ballot to
    him is not a vlolatlon of Article 217 of the Penal Code.
    Yours very truly,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    $c tzLka.&
    BY
    Mary K. Wall
    Assistant
    MKW:bh
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W.V. Geppert, Chairman
    Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
    J.C. Davis, Jr.
    Riley Eugene Fletcher
    J. Arthur Sandlin
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY:
    Leonard Passmore
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-831

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1960

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017