-
.- . EA ORNEY GENERAL OF ?IrEns Ausnnr 1,. TEXAS WLL WILSON ATTORNEYGENERAL May 2, 1960 Honorable Cecil M. Pruett Opinion NO. ``-831 County Attorney Hutchinson County Re: Whether refusal by an. Borger, Texas election judge to de- liver a ballot in the Democratic primary to a person who refuses to allow the judge to stamp "Democrat" on his poll tax receipt, as provided in Art. 13.01a of the Election Code, consti- tutes a violation of Art. Dear Mr. Pruett: 217 of the Penal Code. Your opinion request Involves an interpreation of Sub- section (4)(i) of Article la.Ola of Vernon's Texas Election Code (the "Party Affiliation Law enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1959), which reads as follows: "Each voter shall present his poll tax receipt or exemption certificate, or an affidavit of its loss, to the election judge on the first time such voter participates in a primary election and the election judge shall stamp within the party affiliation space on the face of said poll tax receipt, exemption, or affidavit of loss, the words 'Democrat' or 'Republican' or other party primary vote connotation as the case may be and such stamped poll tax receipt, exemption, or af- fidavit of loss shall be the designation of a qualified member of that party; such qualified member of such party, having once voted within a party primary shall remain a qualified member,,ofthat party for the d-crationof the poll tax period. You have informed us that various persons in your county have stated that they were going to vote in the Democratic primary but would refuse to have their poll tax receipt stamped "Democrat . In anticipation of this occurrence, you have asked the following question: Does refusal of an election judge to deliver a ballot in the Democratic primary to a person or persons Honorable Cecil M. Pruett, page 2 (W-831) who refuse to allow the judge to stamp their poll tax receipt, exemption certificate, or affidavit of loss with the word "Democrat", as provided in Article 13.01a of the Election Code, constitute a violation of Article 217 of the Penal Code? Article 217 of the Penal Code readsas follows: "Art. 217.' Refusing to permit voter ,tovote.--Any judge of any election who shall refuse to receive the vote of any qualified elector who, when his vote is ob- jected to shows by his own oath that he is entitled to vote, or who shall refuse to deliver an official ballot to one entitled to vote under the law, or who shall wil- fully refuse to receive a ballot after one entitled to vote has legally folded and returned same, shall be fined not to exceed five hundred dollars." (Emphasis supplied.) In the light of the underscored portion of Article 217, your question may be restated as follows: Is a person entitled to vote in a Democratic primary if he refuses to allow the election judge to stamp "Demccrat" on his receipt or certificate? Before taking up this question, we should give some atten- tion to whether Article 217 of the Penal Code applies to primary elec-. tions. Article 217 is a part of Chapter 4 of Title 6 of the Penal Code. Various other articles in this chapter refer to "an election or pri- mary" (Art. 2161, "an election, either primary,,special or general" (Art. 218), 'any general cr primary election" IArt. 2?2)> while others use only the term "election" witho~stspecifically mentioning a primary election. However, any doubt as to applicability of Article 217 to primary elections is removed by Article 231 of the Penal Code, also a part of Chapter &,.which provides that the term 'elect,ion"as used in that chapter means "any election, either general, special, or pri- mary, held under authority of law within this State, or within any town, city, district, county, precinct, or any other subdivision with- in this State for any pcrpcse whatever." Returning to your question, Article 18.01a cf the Election Code provides that the voter shall present his poll tax receipt, exemp- tion certificate, or affidavit of loss, anl that the election judge shall stamp the party designation on the receipt, certificate or af- flit. While statutory provisions stating that an act shall be done are sometimes construed to be discretionary or directory rather than mandatory, the ordinary meaning of the word "shall" is equivalent to "must" -- it is a mandatory term, requiring compliance. McLaren v. State
82 Tex. Crim. 449, 199 S.W; 811 (1917); Brinkley v. State, 32C S.W. 655 (Tex. Grim. 1959); Mitchell 'v.Ean,cock,lgb S.W. 694, 730 (Tex.Civ.App. 1917); J&n& s !e, 3Ob S.W.2d 182 (Tex.Civ.App. 1957). Looking to the purposr and intent of Article l?.Cla, we are of the opinion that these provisions are mandatory. The requirement for .- - Honorable Cecil M. Pruett, page 3 (W-831) stamping of the voter's party affiliation is not only for the purpose of furnishing him with evidence that he is qualified to participate in that party's conventions and to hold party offices, but also for the purpose of enabling other parties to determine that he is not eligible to participate in their conventions or to hold office in their party organization. These being mandatory provisions, a person who refuses to allow the primary election judge to stamp the party designation on his receipt, certificate, or affidavit is not entitled to vote in that primary, and the election judge therefore would not violate Article 217 by refusing to deliver a ballot to him. Accordingly, your question is answered in the negative. SUMMARY A person offering to vote in the Democratic pri- mary who refuses to allow the election judge to stamp "Democrat" in the party affiliation space on his poll tax receipt, exemption certificate, or affidavit of loss, is not entitled to vote in that election, and refusal of the election judge to deliver a ballot to him is not a vlolatlon of Article 217 of the Penal Code. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas $c tzLka.& BY Mary K. Wall Assistant MKW:bh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W.V. Geppert, Chairman Houghton Brownlee, Jr. J.C. Davis, Jr. Riley Eugene Fletcher J. Arthur Sandlin REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore
Document Info
Docket Number: WW-831
Judges: Will Wilson
Filed Date: 7/2/1960
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017