-
OF TEXAS AUSTIN ii.TRXAS WILL WILSON oo-" ATT‘,Rnrery CRGNERA.. t& MeY 1, 1958 .eA?L - Hon. Raymond J. Goodman Opinion No. WW-42 e? County Attorney Webb County Re: Tenure of appointment to fill Laredo, Texas vacancy in office of Sheriff, and related questions. Dear Mr. Goodmsn: Your request for an opinion Is based on the following fact8 es set out In gcur letter: "At the general election in 1956 the Honorable I. J.C. Martin, Sr. was re-elected to the offlce of Sher!.ffof Webb County for the term of 4 years ex- piring on'December 31, 1960; snd on January 1, 1957, 'duly qualified and assumed such office and continued to serve in &aid capacity until his death on December 19, 1957 * "The Commlsslonere Court of Webb County, at lta term In Januray, 1958, duly appointed Mr. P.L. Florea; a resident citizen and qualified voter of Webb County, as Sheriff to fill the existing vacancy in said term of office by reason of the death of the late incumbentSheriff J.C. Martin, Sr. Whereupon',Mz; Flores lmmedlstely qualified for and assumed said office." Under these factual cSrcumstance8, you ask the follow- ing question, which we have restated slightly for the sake of brevity: (1) Will the person appointed to fllL the vacancy in the term of.office of,Sherlff be.entltled to hold ttieoffi.cefor the entire unexpired period of the 4-year term and unti.la successor is duly qualified, or ,pnly until the next general election held next folldwing . the date of such appointment? (21 If the Commissioners Carrt 18 authorized to fill e vacaiicyin the office of Sheriff only:until the next..'eneralelection, how shell the designation of the ti& 16.of the office for the unexpired term be printed on the offlclal'ballots for the primary election and f& the general election?' Should the ballots show t@t the election ls.fotian unexpired . . Hon. Raymond J. Goodman, page 2 WW-426 "For Sheriff (unexpired term endi ``?'3~;gi~O)" or “For Sheriff (unexpired term 7 "3 (3) If a qualified person la elected at 8UCh "next general election" for the remaining unexpired term of office of Sheriff, may such person 80 elected qualify for and assume SUCh office lnnxedlately after issuance of his oertlficate of election for said remalnlng unexpired term? If the answer to this qu%$tlon 1.8negative, when may such person qualify for and assume the office? In answer to your first question it la our opinion that the appointment made l.nJanuary, 1958, to fl.11the vacancy jn the office of Sheriff of Webb County will continue only until the general election of 1958, aa hereinafter explained. Article V, Section 23 of the Constitution, a8 amended in 1954, provide8 that vacanc!.es!.nthe office of Sheriff shell be fflled by the Commi88lon%r8 Court "until the next general election." There is no material difference between this provi.slonend the statu-, tory provision i,nvolvedln Sterrett v. Moruan,
294 S.W. 2d.201 (Tex. Clv. App. 1956), under which the court held that theap- polntment continued untl.1 the next general election occurrl~ng after the vacancy. In that case the contention wae made that an appoLntment by the Commlsaioner8 Court of Dallas~County to fill a vacancy in the office of Judge of County Court of Dallas County et Law No. 2, made in September, 1956, would continue for the entire erlod of the unexpl.redterm extending through Decem- ber 31, 195 8 and that an election should not be held at the general %lecCl,onin 1956'to f1.11the remainder,of'.theunexpired term. The court held that vacancLe8 in that office mat be filled aa provided In Article 1970-24, Vernon's Clvfl Statutes, whl~chprovided that any vcscancyin that office "shall be ff.lled by the Commlssloners Court of Dallas Caanty until the next r%gu- lar election" meant the "next general el.ectlon,"which In that case WRS the general election to be held on November 6, 1956. It should be noted that appoi.ntmentsfor the conatitu- t_j~.onal offl. of County Judge and for the offl,ceof Juxcoof the Peace ar% controlled by Article V, Sectjon 25 of the ConSti- tutjon, which prOvj.d%Sthet vecanciee in these offices ShRll be filled by appointment by the Commlsalonere Court 'until the next general %leCtiOn for such offices." As pointed out in
291 S.W.2d 249(TRx. CLv.'App. lg56), this era meterlally from the vacancy provisions appll- cable'to other offices, which do not contain the qualifying phrase "for euch officea." Rawll,nav. Drake held that appolnt- m%nts for th%S% two offices COnthU% untjl the next general election for such offlcek whl,chwould be the generai election occurring four yeara aft& the electionat which the term in which the vacancy occurred had been originally filled; but a8 Hon. Raymond J. Gocdman, page 3 WW-426 to other offices, when vacancies occur the offices are filled by appointment until the next succeeding general election. be noted, further, that e constitutional emendment will b?v?Ed"' on at the general election in 1958 to change Section 28 of Article V 80 ab to provide that va&anci%e 1.nthe office of County Judge and JU8tiCee of the P%ece ahall be filled by the Commia- elonere Court 'until the next succeeding General Election." H.J.R. 30, Acts of the 55th Leg., R.9. 1957, p. 1640. In your second question you ask whether the official ballot should show that the election is for the unexpired term. Article 13.X of the Election Code requres that the eppllcetion of a cahdidete for 0 place on the prlmery,ballot show whether it is for a full term or an tinexpitied terti,but the statutas tire* ticrlbingthe form of the offLcle1 ballot (Artlolee 6.01, 6.05, and 13..Ogof the'Elbctlon Code) are silent on the"queetlon of whether this information should be shown on the ballots. We are of the opinion that the iailure of the ballot8 either at the prlmery election or at the general election her% under conaldetiatldnto show that it ie for the unexpired term would not lnvelid8te the election, but we think ~lt 1s ~entlrelg~- proper for the ballots in both elections to ehow that the eled&n ie for the unexpired $&rm. Either derlgnetlon suggest&d lh yarr letter would be eatle eotorJr'.' 'In meklng up the bellote'for the general election, the Secreter of State usually designates the unexpired teti by the words ITunexf)lred,term)"' or "(for the un- expired term)" following the title OS the office. ,,,, Conceivably eiielectton might be deolared lnvelid if' there were C8Iidid8t%8at the aaineele@on both fcir an unexpired term end for's aucc6eding full term in en offlc%.and the ballots were so prepared that the voters Could iiottell for which teriK the c8ndid8t08 were running. This situation cannot occur in the 1958 elections to fill the unexpired t&m Ln the office of Sher- iff, and we are expreaeing'no opinion on what designtitlonwould be required in such e situation. It would occur only where some- one aought election to the brief portion of an unexplr%d term between the general electloh and,the commencement of the new t%rm filled at the eeme eleatlon, end frbm past experience it ear% unlikely that the eltuetloriWill arise very often if at znn . In your third question you ask when the person elected &t the next general election mey quellfg for and amume the of- fide. Under Article XVI, Section 17 of the Constitution, the b;ppointedfncumbent will be entitled and in fact will be under k-duty, to continue to ptirformthe duties of'the orflce until hi8 ,suci?bsbor lb dulg qiaallfled. The ilection of a succeadbi--. to the appointed Sh~rlii will not be completed until the result8 Hon. Raymond J. Goodmn, p8ge 4 WW-426 of the eleotion have been officially c8nveesed by the Commi8- 8lonere Court under Article 8.34 of the Election Code, end the eucceeeor cennot claim the oifice befbre that time. u mrta
147 Tex. 248,~215 S.W. 26 325 (1948). Howevg we are sei? opinion that the parson elected will be entltled'to a ca- tlflcete of election es soon as the results ere officially can- vassed, end that he may qualify and eeeume.the office immediately thereafter. So fer l 8 w% have been able to find, this precise point ha8 not been ruled on by the Texas courts but this seems to u8 to be the clear meaning of.the constitutional provl8lon8 and la the conclusion indicated in 3x Dart0
Sanders, supra. In that ca8e, the person elected et the general election was not entitled to esaume office before the fir& day of January following the elec- tion, the date of the commencement of the new term, because he had been elected to the new term.end not to the unexpired term. The opinion implies that a person elected to en unexpired term would be entitled to receive a certificate of election and to es8ume the office es soon es the election had been completed. The hold- ings in Attorney General'8 Opinion8 0-1664, 0-6206, v-685, end any other prior opltiiona Implying that e person elected to ah unex- pired term is not entitled to assume offtce until January 1 fol- lowing his election ere hereby overrul&dd An appointment by the Commissioners Court to fill a vacancy in the office of Sheriff continues only until the next general election following the occurrence of the vacancy. Tex. Conat., Art. V, Sec. 23. Where a vacancy occurred Ln December, 1957, an election should be held at the gene=1 election in 1958 for the remainder of the unexprled term ending on December 31, 1960, end candidates for nomination to the office may run in the primary election. In both a primary election end a general elec- tion for an uaexplred term of office, it la proper for the ballots to show that the election 18 for the unexpired term. A peraon'elected to en unexpired term in the office of Sheriff is entitled to receive e certifl- cete of election end to eaaume the office as soon as the results of the election he,vebeen officially can- vassed by the Comkle'sloneraCourt under Article 8.34 of the Election Code. The incumbent contlrplestomper- form the duties of the ofilceuntil his successor is duly qualified. .: - Eon. Raymond J. Goodman, page fj W-426 Yours very tru1g wIz& wrLBoN Attorney General of Texas By s/Mary K. Wall Mary Ki Wall AasLstant MKl?:nh:wc APPROVED: OPINION CObWITTEE Gee. P. Blackburn, Cheirman J. C. Davis, Jr. C. K. Richards L. P. Lollar RlWIBWEDFORTHBATTCRNRYGENXiRAL By: W. V. Geppert
Document Info
Docket Number: WW-426
Judges: Will Wilson
Filed Date: 7/2/1958
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017