-
HE *a ORNF,Y GENERAL OF%'EXAS April 25, 1958 Hon. GeorgeR. Killam OPINIONNO. WW-420 CountyAttorney scurry county Re: Whether oil, gas and Snyder,Texas mineralpropertiesheld in trust for Texas BaptistChildren'sHome for stateapurposesare exempt from countyad Dear Mr. Killam: valoremtaxes. In your requestfor an opinionof this officeon the above captionedmatter,you have advisedus of the followingfacts. Dora E. Cunninghamdevisedall of her right,title and interestIn and to the oil, gas and other mineralsin and under all of Section613 of Block 97 of the East part of Section653 In said Block 97, H. & T.C. Ry. Co. Survey in Scurry County,Texas, in trust for a statedperiod (whichperiodhas not expired)for the benefitof the Texas BaptistChildren'sHome, locatedat Round Rook, Texas. We quote the followingexcerptfrom the will: "11. The incomeand principalof the Trust estate shallbe administeredand distributedas follows: "a) During the existenceof the Trust, there &all be paid to or for the benefit of the TEXAS BAPTIST Cm's HOME, locatedat Round Rook, Texas, 80 much of the principalor income of the Trust as the Trustees in the exeroiaeof their sole discretionshall determine. I hereby state that the primarypurposesfor which this Trust Is establishedare "1) To providefunds for the erectionand maintenanceof necessarybuildingsand the purchaseand maintenanceof necessaryequipmentfor the operationof said Texas BaptistChlldren'aHome; "Ii) To providefunds for the care and maintenanceof the groundsof said Texas Baptist Children"8Home; "iii) To providefunds for the purchaseof additionalgroundsneeded In the operationof said Texas BaptistChildren'sHorns, -.. _ Hon. GeorgeR. Killam,page 2, (WW-420) and I direct that the exerciseof their discretionin this respect shallbe in conformitywith the foregoing purposes. "b) Any funds which the Trusteesin their sole discretionshall determineare not necessaryfor the purposesexpressedin subparagraph(a) of this paragraph 11 of this ARTICLE II may be paid by the Trusteesin their sole discretionto any one or mom of the Southern Baptistreligious,charitable,sciantiffo,literaryor educationalorganizatfons locatedin the State of Texas. "0) In limitationof all provisionscontainedin this my Last Will and Testamentwith respectto the Tmat herein created,I expresslydirect that: "1) All funds, propertfssand assets of the Trust shall be used for religious,oharita'ble,solenti- fio, literaryor educationalpurposesor for the pre- ventionof crueltyto childrenand for no other purposes, provided,however,that all funds,propertiesand assets shall be used wfthin the Stats of Texas exoP~sivslyfor such purposes.s ." 11 . . D * The Trust heroin createdshall tem!.nateon she "I.2 date which is the tweniy-fLrstanniversaq of ,$hedeath c~f the last survivorof MAURINEMYRTIS AWFAS,MATTE ROSS CONSLEY and DANIELM. GIBSON,and all prir,cipa: and undistributedin- come then remainLugin Trust shallbe imnsdiatelydistributed to the Board of Trusteesof the Texas Baptrst ChiL3refi's Home of Round Rook, Texas, for tie 'useby said Boar6 Yor the bane- fit of said Texas BaptistChildren'sHome in conformitywftii the purposeshereinaboveexpressedin s¶graph {aj of paragraph11 of this ARTICLE II.. If, on the date of such termination,the said Texas BaptistChiLLron'sHome fs no longer in sxistsnce,all principaland undistribntedincome than remainingin Trust shall be immediatelydistrsibuted to the RAEIST FOUNDATIONOF TEXAS, Dallas,Texas,to be used for such religious,oharftable,scientific,literaryor educationalpurposeswithin the State of Texas as the govern- ing body of such BaptistFoundationof Texas shall determine." The trust propertyis presentlyproduof~?of1 and gas, and you ask whetherthe mineral Interestheld by the Trustees,isexemptfrom county M:'aloPem taxes. Hon. GeorgeR. Killam,page 3, (WW-420) ArticleVIII, Section2 of the Constitutionof the State of Texas, has empoweredthe Legislatureto exemptfrom taxationcertain enumeratedproperties,among which are "- . . institutfonsof purely public charity." In pursuanceto this particularconstitutional grant, the LegislatureenactedSection7 of Article7150, V.C.S. Article 7150 reads, in part, as follows: "The followingpropertyshall be exempt from taxation,to-wit: "7. Public charities.I All buildingsbelongingto institutionsof purelypublic charity,togetherwith the lands belongingto and occupiedby such Institutionsnot leased or otherwiseused with a view to profit,unless such rents and profitsand all moneys and creditsaru appropriated by such institutionssolelyto sustainsuch institutionsand for the benefitof the sick and disabledmembersand their familiesand the burial of the same, or for the maintenance of personswhen unable to providefor themselves,whether such personsare members of such institutionsor not. An institutionof purely public charityunder this artiole is one which dispensesits aid to its membersand others in sicknessor distress,or at death,withoutregard to poverty or riches of the recipient,also when the funds,property and assets of such institutionsare placed and bound by its laws to relieve,aid and administerin any way to the relief of its memberswhen in want, sicknessand distress, and providehomes for its helplesssnd dependentmembersand to educateand maintainthe orphansof its deceasedmembers or other persons." It is clear that the charitabletrust under considerationis an institutionof purelypublic charitywfthin the meaningof Section2 of ArticleVIII of the Texas Constitotionand Section7 of Article 7150, V.C.S. State v. Settegast,254 53-w.925 (Comm. APP. 1923)0 We, therefore,pass to a consider&&m of whether exemptionmay be accordedthe propertyin qusstlonunder the facts in this case. In Morris v. Lone Star Ch. Ro. 6, R.A.M.,
68 Tex. 697, 5 S.W., 519 (1887)the court held that under Section2 of ArticleVIII of the Constitution,the bgislature could exempt from taxationthe buildingsof "institutions of purely public charity"but that such authorizationextendedonly to such buildingsaud groundsas were used exolusivelyand owned by such institutionsand that exclusive use meant the actual and directuse for the purposesof the chari- table association. - ^. Hon. GeorgeR. Killam,page 4, (WW-420) In the S&t= case, supra,the court held that the trustees _ -. ^ owea tax08 on oertalnpropertieswhich wore a psrt of the Hermsnn HospitalEstate. In that case the will had establishede.trust far the purposeof buildingand maintaininga charitablehospital. The trusteeswere conductingthe businessof -aging the propertyand constructingthe hospitalunder the name of the H-nu Hospftal Estate. The propertyin questionInvolvedsix rent houses;and all rents and incometherefromwere to be uasd solelyto supportand maintainthe HornannHospital. The court pointedout that the hospitalitselfwas to be built on other propertyand that the propertyin questionwas not being used directlyin connection with the bullding and operationof the hospital'but or- In Its maintenance. In Hedgecroftv. City of Houston,
150 Tex. 654,
244 S.W.2d 612(1952).the court was concernedwl,th ,thsPollowinafacts. The H~dg&~ft'Corporation had acquiredtitle to the propertyin questionthroughgift and oonveyar~cs on December30, 1948. Before that tfme the corporationhad agreed with a constructioncompany to make the necessaryalterationsand repairs of the propertyto fit It for the operationof a hospital,clinicand trainingschool; and beginnfngwith the week endingJuly 7, 1948, and oontlnulng until December29, 1948, the constructioncompanyhad been preparing plans for repairsand alterations. From August 1, 1948, through December27, 1948, a blue print compav had farnfshednuminous blue prints concerningthe contemplatedrepairs. Prior to the corporation's acquisitionof tha prapperty fn ques-',jcln and immediately thereafterincludl.ug January I, lpkp, the corporationwas engaged in planningand znaklngthe necessaryrepaira. The remodsliagwas completedou May L3 to an extentwhit!!&lowed tbs clinic to move on to the p&:2:: ; and tts ollnit: had since 'been. o``ntfnuous- ly in operationthere. The Cii;yof Housrrxant the B:onston Inde- pendentSchool Dis,triot Instituteda suit for taxes for t&e year 1949. It wa8 contendedthat there was no actual use of the premises within the meaningof the oonst:ftationSecanse,thebu:ldingwas not then actuallybeing used for charitablepurposes, The court reviewedthe followingTexas cases deal.l.ng,#it.h the requzrement of exolusiveuse: State v. Settegast,254 S.W. 923 (Conrm. App. 1% Morris v. Lone St& ChapterNo. 6 Royal Arch Masons,
68 Tex. 698, ;8Sg.;T519; B.P.O.E.Lodge No. 151 v, City of Houston,44 S.W. 2d ex. Civ. App., 1g319errorre%), and distinguished these on the ground that in each case third partieswe'reoccupyingall or a portion of the premises. In holdingthat tna propertyin qUeStlOU was exempt, the court revieweddecisionsin other States in which exemptionhad been accordedon the basis that if the subsequentuse of the premises 1 . - Hon. GeorgeR. Killam,page 5, (w-420) createda tax exempt situationthen & uee which wae confinedto readyingthem for such purposeestablisheda right to exemption. At page 636 the court said: ,I . . D The work proceededuntil it wa.8 completedon May 13, 1949, and since that time the hospitaland cliniohave been operateda8 8.public charity. The facts alleged show, in (Emphasissupplied.) The court in allowingthe exemptionrecognizedthe well settled rule that exemptionsfrom taxationare not favoredand shouldbe strictlyconstrued,but statedthat a constructionof the acts alleged in the petitiona8 not amountingto uee would be un- reasonablystrictand narrow. We think it evidentfrom these decisionsthat the exemption accordedto charitableinstltutlonsextendsonly to the buildings and groundsused in the actual conductof the charitablepurppses for which the institutionIs operated. We thereforehave concluded that the propertyin questionis not exempt from countyad valorem tsxee; and you are accordinglyso advised." SUMMARY Oil, gas and mineral interests held in trust for the Texas Baptist ChlldrenssHome and for other charitablepurposesaze not exemptfrom countyad valoremtaxes. Yo;lrsvery truly WILL WITSON AttorneyGeaercsl of Texas MMP/bn APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE George Pi Blackburn,Chairman 8. ~&lark ticLaughlin &gYFyg~r RJJVCEWED FOR T@.ATTORNEY GENERAL > hy~ W.~:v, Lieppert
Document Info
Docket Number: WW-420
Judges: Will Wilson
Filed Date: 7/2/1958
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017