Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1948 )


Menu:
  • Hon. R. E. Schneider,       Jr.     Opinion Ho. V-685
    Count Attorney
    Live i ak County                    Re: Effective date of a
    George West, Texas                      proposed election  to
    abolish the office  of
    County Superintendent
    In Live Oak County.
    Dear Sir:
    We refer   to your recent   letter   from which we
    quote,     la part:
    “Live Oek County Is a county having
    more than 2,000 but less ten 3?000 scho-
    lastic   population, and the County Super-
    intendent has recently resigned.
    “The statute authorizing  and providing
    for the office    of County Superintendent Is
    Artlole   2688 as emended by the Acts of 1945,
    end provides in part as follows:
    “111 all counties now or hereafter
    having the office    of county Superintendent,
    where the scholastic     population according
    to the last scholestlc      census 1s less than
    3,000, but more than 2,000, the office          of
    County Superintendent     shall continue un-
    less and until a majority of the quall-
    fled property tax paying voters of said
    county, voting et an election       held to de-
    termine whether said office       shell be abol-
    Ished, shall vote to abolish said office,
    which election   shall be ordered by the Com-
    missioners’ Court upon petition        therefor
    es hereinafter   specified,      Provided, how-
    ever, that If a majority of said voters
    voting et seld election      herelnebove pro-
    vided for, vote to abolish said office
    said election   shall not become effective
    until the expiration     of the term of of-
    fice for which the County Supeplntendent
    .   _
    Hon. R. E. Schneider,   Jr.,   psge 2     (V-685)
    has been elected    or appointed.’
    ‘The term for which the County Super-
    intendent was elected will expire December
    31, 1950.   The office is now vecant.
    “Under the provisions of Article  2355
    of the Revised Civil Statutes,   the Commis-
    sioners’ Court has authority to fill   vrcan-
    CIES in the office  of the County Superin-
    tendent, such appointme to hold office
    until the next General Election.
    “It seems to be the concensu6 of opin-
    ion of the County School 3oWd that the of-
    fice of County Superintendent       Is not neces-
    sary lh the o&T,        due to the feet that due
    to recent consolldatf~ns      end annexation pro-
    ceedings there ere only two corrrm~nschool
    districts    in the county, the rest of the dis-
    tricts    ROWbeing In tvo independent school
    districts.     The County Board had In mind
    the circulation    of petitions   for the Com-
    missloners~ Court to call the election         pro-
    vided for In Article     2688 in order that
    the vote?6 vould have an opportunity       to de-
    termlne vhether or not the office       should
    be kbollshed,    and the question arose as
    to vhen the election     would become effec-
    tive la the event it carried to abolish the
    OfflCd.     The question being vhhethep or not
    ths election    would becoue effective    at the
    next General Election to be held this OQP-
    lng November, or vould the election       not be-
    come effective    until January lst,    1951."
    In Opinion V-545, this office     8dvlsed thet by
    virtue of the provlsieas     of Artlcl   2688, as amended,
    (quoted in your letter     hereinabove P all counties having
    the office   of County Superintendent,    where the scholes-
    tic population    is less than 3,000 but more than 2,000,
    have been granted the express power to abolish by bn
    election   the office   of County Superintendent.     Further,
    thet the general rule, supported by the weight of auth-
    orlty,   Is that where a county 16 empowered by the Leg-
    lslrturs   to create an office,    It may, if unr66trlcted
    abolish It; but that the leglalrtlvo      history   c0nc8ralng
    the Texas Act, Article     2688, calls for am exception to
    this rule.    Opinion O-3839.
    Hon. R. E. Schneider,    Jr.,   page 3   (V-685)
    Live Cak County, assuming that it has the
    scholastic   population reported herein, has the express
    power to abolish Its office       of County Superintendent   in
    the manner set out In Article       2688, as amended. The
    Legislature   having specifically     provided the statutory
    procedure,   applicable to Live Oak County, by which the
    office   of County Superintendent may be abolished,      it
    follows that said office     may not be abolished In any
    other manner.
    However, Article   2688, as amended, also pro-
    vides that if a majority of the qualified     voters vote
    to abolish said office   of Its County Superintendent
    "said election  shall not become effective    until the ex-
    piration  of the term of office    for which the Eounty
    Superintendent has been elected or apQointed.       (&@a-
    sls ours)
    Since 1931, the office     of County School Super-
    intendent has been for e term of four gears.         Article
    2688, V. C. S. By virtue,of       the provisions   of Article
    2355, hovever, wherever necessity       requires the appolnt-
    ment of a person to fill      a vacancy created In said of-
    fice,   that offlce   is open to election    at the next Gen-
    eral Election,     end the term of the appolntee'wlll     ex-
    ire on January 1st follow1 ~0``o````4~e````~2~lectlon.
    1 ttorney Gen6re1's Opinions
    Attorney Generalls“Cpinion  lo. 0-1833 further
    advises to the effect  that the fact that It Is now too
    late for e cendidate for nominee for the Democratic Per-
    ty to get his name printed upon the Primary Election
    ballot, or as for that matter, the failure    of the Demo-
    cratic Party to select a nominee, will not affect    the
    right of the people to elect e County Superintendent at
    the General Election  in Rovember. The voters may vote
    their choice by writing the candidate's    name in the blank
    space provided for that purpose.
    !&us, If the Commissioners' Court of Live Oak
    County, acting under Article   2355, appoints,  prior to
    General Election day, a person to fill    the vacancy exist-
    ing In Its office  of County Superintendent,   the term of
    said appointee qualifying   therefor will expire on Janu-
    ary 1st following  the next General Election,   towlt, Jan-
    uary 1, 1949; and If prior to General Election date, the
    office  of County Superintendent Is abolished in accor-
    dance with the provisions   above quoted of Article   2688,
    as amended, then that statute provides in effect     that
    Eon. B. E. Schneider,Jr.,   psge 4    (V-685)
    .m.   .   .seid:abolls~ent election vi11 become effective on "the
    .~
    expiration of the term of office for vhiqh the County
    Superintendenthas been . . . eppolnted, tovlt, Jenu-
    ,C,-_.
    _.__...
    ~'(8.;
    i'i eiv J.,1949.
    ,_.____,.,
    "...r..r-..‘.-.
    If the Commissioners1Court of Live Oek
    County, acting under Article 2355, V. C. S.,
    prior to General Election day eppoints e per-
    60~ to fill the vacancy existing in the of-
    fice of County Superintendent,the term of
    Said appointeevi11 expire on January lst,
    fo11owing the next Genera1 Election. Attor-
    ney General's Opinion6 Ros. O-6923, O-1664,
    o-2212.
    And if, prior to General Election dey,
    the offlse of County SuperintendentIs abol-
    l6hed In accordancewith Article 2688, V. C.
    S   as 6mended, 66id abolition elwtion vi11
    biiome effective elt"the lxplrrtien of the
    term of office for vhiah the CountynSuper-
    intendanthas been . . . appolnt6d.
    Your6 very truly,
    ATTORRRYGERRRALOF TEXAS
    CBO:mw                         ,,wf-
    Cheqter R. 01116On
    A66$@t8st
    APPltBVRD;
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-685

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1948

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017