Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )


Menu:
  •        OFFICE   OF THE   ATTORNEY      GENERAL      OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Honorable X. J. Townsend
    county Attorney
    Angellne cousitg
    lAmal,   Texas
    Dear Sir:                    Opinion NO. O-7507
    Be:   I8 the presenoe
    This acknowledges    recei
    date whioh rsada:
    county Attorney-
    -i&act    to be
    wher, inveetiga-
    1 violations     or
    quallfled   for
    the oath of
    investigating     wltmo``
    5. code of Crlalnal Prooedure, 8hte8    thet
    and juror's oath la that *the Stete'a   ooun-
    owe* and your own, you shall keep eecret.m
    367b, C. C. P., whioh provides for the lppolntment
    of grand Jury bailiris,  m&es a portion or said balliff'e  oath
    thet 'you will keep eooret,the prooeedlngs of the grand jury.*
    iionortible     ii.   3. ‘i’owneand,   pa,:e 2
    Art. 336, c. c. E., provides for the oath TV be takeu by
    B wituese VW testifies before a grand jury.       h portion of said
    oath la that *you will keep eeoret   all yrooeodlnge    of the greud
    jury.”
    Art. 375,          C. C. P., provides that “the attorney repressnt-
    lng the State          may go befom   the grend jury at any time exoept
    when Xhoy are          dlnouoalng the propriety   of finding an lndlot-
    nbmntor voting          upon the B(UPB.~
    In view of the preoedlng statutes pertalnlng        to the aeorsoy
    of   grand  jurs  prooeedlngs,  and In view of the statute    apeolfioallg
    .authorltiing the appearanoe befor@ the grand jury or the attorney
    mpreaontlng      ~tha State, it would seein that a apeoiflo   le&slatlve
    authorlsatian     would be neoemury to allow the Xetrlot        and County
    At~rne&Gtoot,         aa auoh, to attend eeaaionr of a grand jury.
    Slnoe we find no law authorizing       their preaenoe et eaid weeions,
    we oonolude that said attorney8 am unauthorized pelraona at thoee
    aeaalona.
    Although we find no !l’exaa oaaea In point, in i’eople             V. Lunson,
    150 M. 6. 280, the Supremo Court of Illlnole    aaid:
    *It     ie a rundaaectal     element of a grand jury lmea-
    To thie end the law refuses
    -A grand jury Is organlsed for the purpose or pro-
    teoting oltisenr   from unfounded aocuaation es well aa
    lnveafigating   ehugom of ori~     and returning  lndlot-
    -AtO     thema.   By mawn    or the faot that the purpow
    of au& pra#eotlan may be largely      forfeited  where the
    lnverfigafiona   of the grand jury beooma known, the
    work of that body ia surrounded by eecreoy and Vb8Wd
    with wlamnlty.     Out of thaeo vtewr hae ariaen the
    rule that unauthofiierd Deraono mey not be allowed to
    attend upon their lnve8tlgatlona.~      Iemphdsfi added)
    In View        of the   toregoing   it   i# the oplnlon of thim department
    that    the pra8enoe of the Dlatrlot              and County Attornep8-ileot, aa
    311
    Louorobla      ii.   J . ,i'ownsond,pace 3
    euch, in rrgrand jury eeesion, wherein lnvestiC;~tionsof ori~-
    ill vlolatione am belnb zwde, is unauthorized and ehould not
    be permitted.
    lit,   trust that the foregoing fully anewera your questIon.
    Youre vary truly,
    William ii. Stepp
    Aaaietant
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-7507

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1946

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017