Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )


Menu:
  •                                                        .:GL                      r-
    :..,    :     ~,. ..-
    Honorable R. F, Bobinson   '. ':         ~' .."
    thmty At+n?y
    ltillaoy County                           .,
    Raymcndville,~T&xaa   -~                       : ..        :   :   ~.
    Dear Gil-r
    Opinion ‘No; 0+7i9i .:.,     :. .:.
    '; :,Ret‘.lYlay  9 Citywhich..had a.population of
    lese~than ~6.q +odovding:to the-last
    " Fede~l..Cnnbus levy'rrtax for tht3
    ':~oumt yoa+.df +ey ,thim.l~&'onthe
    ume?le’~p~opbrty     bf 6ease, supra
    , wae followed Ln a letter opinion written
    by Assistant Attorney GeneraIDeonard, $ing.,-datedOctober 22, 1935, (Voi.
    367, p. 979, Letters of Attorney General) which opinion construed the
    same statute as was construed int,he..Cityof Tyler case and said: "In
    enswer to your second question you ars advised~that the Courts of this
    State have held that it is not neoessary to acoept the yederal Census in
    arriving at the oorrect population of~a City, butto the,oontrary, have
    held that the population of a oity should be determined at the time the
    proposed ordinance is passed by the gove.rningboard of a city . . . It
    is therefore olear thata city may determine.by census 'orotherwise the
    population of a city for the purposs of enaoting an ordinance fixing the
    rate to be oharged for light'and 'power."
    Honorable R. F. Robinson, Page 3               O-7392
    In Bell v. Kirkland, 41 S. V., 2d 443, error refused, certain partirs
    opposing the formation of a rural high school  district raised a cuestion
    as to the scholastic population of a school district, TheCourt held that the
    statute imposed the d*ity of determining such soholastio population upon
    the County Judge or the County School Trustees, end, in the absence of
    fraud, suoh fact was not open to controversy.
    Also   in   line   75th   the ebm   aUthOritie8,    see   30 Teei.&ar. 103.
    Under the facts outlined by you, viethink ‘t” above authorities                 justify
    the conclusion that the city in question is governed by the             terms of
    Artiole 1028, R. S., and Fe aooordingly answer'yowquestion               in the affirma-   .
    tive,
    7% &sire to thank you'for the'vory helpfulbrief of the ,questionenclosed
    in your letter of ~inquiry.
    ,
    Ycurs very truly.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-7392

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1946

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017