Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )


Menu:
  •                                                                      606
    .
    OFFICE   OF THE   ATTORNEY     GENERAL     OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Honorable George Ii. Sheppard
    Comptroller of Publib Accounts
    Austin, Texas
    Dear   Siri                      opinion    MO. 0-7361
    Re:    Wnether trucks     stocked
    in the city of Aaarill
    store tax on the 8ix a
    plenished and serviced
    same source8 as hi8
    At times he will
    a ripplies   frorol one of
    rueks will each be owned by the aanw
    at will be operated on a partnership;
    .operator of the truck uill receive
    s of,tho nut proceed8 and one-third   will
    go to the truck QPmer- There may be some question
    as to the control    of these trucke, but under the
    present plan, It is the understanding of this de-
    partment that they will be controlled    by the owner
    of the store.
    *Question:     Will push   trucks   be suljject   to
    the Chain Store    Tax Law?"
    607.   1.
    I
    Honorable   Ceorgs HI Sheppard,    Page 2
    In response to our request for additional         inf or-
    mation,on   December 3, 1946, you advised us further:
    “You recently  received from this de art-
    ment a request for an opinion as to whet R~   er a
    truck making ealre would be subject to the
    atore tax.    I am furnishing you with informa-
    tion secured, by Mr. John U..Yileon(   District
    Tax Supervisor in Amarillo.
    Vhere are two tracks operating    In the
    Amarillo district.   One Is a semi-trailer
    making sales in Plrasant Valley,   which is
    north of Amarillo.   The other truck ie a
    f&you:;el   trailer operating in the City of
    .
    “The merahandiee is picked up at one
    of the stores and placed in the truck in
    display form.    The truak then proceeds down
    the street contacting    housewives and other
    potential  buyers.   They, in turn, enter thio
    partiaular  truak, make purahases of the mer-
    chandlee displayed,   and pay for same inside
    the truck.
    “The sal.es are made in the truoks.   The
    merchandise 1s not delivered  by truck drivers
    or salesmen to the purchasers in their homee.”
    Whether or.not the trucks and trailers   in question
    are stores ie determined by the definition    of the term *store”
    aa contained in the Taxae Chain Store Tax Law (house Bill 18,
    Ch. 400, Acts J+l+thLeg. 1st C. 3. 1933, Codified aa Art. lllld,
    Penal Code), said definition  reading as follows:
    Vea. i      The term tstorel    as used in this
    Aat,    shall be construed    to mean and include elly
    store or stores or any mercantile        eetablisbment
    or establiahmeuts      not epeaifiaally    exempted with-
    ‘in this Act which are owned, operated,         maintained,
    or controlled     by the 331ne person, agent      receiver,
    trustee,     firm, oorporation,    copartnership    or aesoc-
    iation,   either domestic or foreign,       in which goods,
    wares or merohandiee of any kind are aold, at re-
    tail or wholesale,*       (Underscoring ours),
    .
    6aEa
    ,.
    Honorable   George H. Yhepperd,   Page 3
    You etatr in effect  that these truoke and trallore
    are plaoee, *in which goodah weree and merchandise are eo1d.n
    Therefore,   if theso vehialse ere wetoreeR end/or %eraentile
    letabliehmeqte w then they would constitute   uetoree~ within
    the meeniag of the Chein Store Tex Len.
    The word *etom* was defined by the Commission of               ,.
    A eels in the ease of Continental   Paper Beg Co, v, Boeworth~,
    2f 8 8. W, 170, as follower
    The term *meraentlle eetabliehment+l    is defined       in
    21 Corpus Jurie 904 as follawe~
    *A plea. where the buying and eellin    of
    ertialre   of aerahandlee de an employment f e
    aonduated.*
    ..ds-’
    Tha Supreme CourO of the United States in the aaee
    of Fox v.   Ytendud Oil 00. 
    294 U.S. 93
    , 79* LI Ed. 786, in
    aonetruin    the Chein Store Aot of the State of Weat Virginia,
    (whioh de i inea’the word &ore in tha identical   phraseology as
    the Tetie Gheln Store Aat) in en opinion by Mr. Justice
    Cardosa, used the.following   lenguago:
    *. * + The ‘goods offered  for aale are to
    be underlltoad es having reference    to goods *of
    sny kind * and thaplaae      at which the eale is
    mede ehefl lnalude,not    only plaaee that in the
    WE:;      e erch of men would be designated as
    .E ut broadly sneaking. eny meroantile
    eetebliehment,    whether a rtoic o? something
    &e**       (Undoreaorlng ours).
    Based upon the facts as iven us, and the definl-
    tione of the,worde and terms used f n the Cnein Store Act,
    together with the aonetruation   given b our Courts, we
    arrive at the ineeaapeble  aonclueion t hat the trucks end
    609   ,!
    Honorable   Georke H. Sheppard,   Page 4
    ~trailera  are *merosntile   establiehaente    in which goode, weres
    and marohandlrew are cold.      In fact,   auoh vehialee  80 equipped
    and used. amount,.~.in our opinion,   to a atore on wheels.    A
    store is a atort;: whether mobile or immobile.
    “.
    W4 trust   *@at we hate eatiefaotorb4ly    answered your
    inquiry.
    Yours   vary    truly
    ATTORNEY
    OENEUL OF TEXAS
    By+*
    w. v..   cappart
    Aaatstanlr
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-7361

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1946

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017