Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1946 )


Menu:
  • GROVER SELLERS AUSTXX 11. A Honorable Geo. H. Sheppard Comptroller of Public Accounts Austin, Texas Dear Mr. Sheppard: Opinion No. o-6985 Re: Whether or not the Unemplog- ment Compensation Commission may employ a husband whose wife is employed by another State department. You request our opinion upon the above-captloned subject matter, as follows: "Please refer to your Opinion No. 0-6705 and advise whether the Unemployment Compensation Com- mission may employ a husband whose wife is emplog- ed by another State department. "There is some confusion es to whether the Un- employment Compensation Commission 1~ controlled by the rider in the appropriation bill. In our Opinion No. 0-6705, to which you refer, we quoted the general provision appended to the current biennial approprlation for State departments (Senate Bill 317, Reg. Sess., 49th Legislature) as follows: "None of the foregoing appropriations for sal- aries shall be pala or warrants issued therefor by the State Comptroller to any employee until the em- ployee shall have filed with the head of the depart- ment In which he or she is employed an affFdavit showing his or her marital status, and if marrted, whether or not the spouse of such employee Is also employed in one of the Departments of this State and the name of the Department where such spouse is employed, together with the name of such spouse; the head of such department, In addition to the statutory affidavit now required to be attached to all payrolls, shall also set forth Fn the payroll affidavit that all .of his employees have made the required affidavit and also set forth the facts of -. -. Honorable Geo. H. Sheppard, page 2 o -6985 any said relationship employment as disclosed by said employees' affidavit, together with the name of the department where such spouse is em- ployed, and if such relationship employment does not exist then said affidavit shall so state, and the head of the department and the State Comptroller shall not approve for payment or is- sue warrants or checks for salaries to either the husband or wife where both said husband and wife are employed in the departments of this State subject, however,to the following provisions. *******" "The provisions herein shall apply to depart- ment heads and members of Commissions but not to the manager and matron of the Gorse State Farm. The word 'department' as used herein shall mean those departments ~named in this Act and the Soil Conservation Board and shall not apply to other agencies of this State and the employees employ- ed thereby." Answering one of the inquiries we said In that opinion: "It will be impossible for both of these people -- husband and wLfe -- to continue to work for the departments in which they are em- ployed, or any other of the departments pro- vided for in Senate Bill No. 317." Your expressed confusion as to whether or not this rule applies to Texas Unemployment Compensation Commission arises, no doubt, from the specific general provisions con- tained in Senate Bill 317 Immediately following the designa- talonof TEXAS UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION, as fol- lows: "All moneys granted to this State by the Federal Government for the administration of the Unemployment Compensation Act are hereby appropriated to be expended for purposes for which such moneys were granted. Notwithstand- ing any other provisions of this Act, moneys granted for travel shall be expended Fn the amounts and in accordance with the standards of the Social Security Board and the rules and regulations adopted by the Unemployment Com- pensation Commisslon to meet such standards. Out of state travel expense paid solely from Federal Honorable Geo. H. Sheppard, page 3 o-6985 grants and made in accordance with the Federal standards as being necessary for proper admlnis- tration of the Unemployment Compensation Act do not have to have the approval of the Attorney General. "Salaries of the employees of the Unemploy- ment Compensation Commission and members of the Commission shall be paid In accordance with agree- ments made between the Commission and the Social Security Board, but in no case shall such salaries be less than those authorized by the Act creating the Unemployment Compensation Commission; provided, however, there shall be no salary increases to em- ployees of the Texas Unemployment Compensation ex- cept those that are the result of the orderly ad- minLstration of the merit system of personnel ad- ministration as required by the Social Security Act. "It is specifically provided that all moneys now on deposit to the credit of the Unemployment Compensatlon Fund, and any moneys recelved for the credit of such fund, are hereby appropriated for the payment of benefits and refunds as authorized by the provisions of the Unemploymsnt Compensation Law .' We find nothing in the last above quoted special provision that could be construed to except Texas Unemploy- ment Compensation Commission from the rule announced by us in our Opinion No. 0-6705. There is nothing shown in your Inquiry, or other- wise known to us, indicating that there is anything In any of the standards of the Social Security Board, or 1n any requirement whatsoever of any federal agency that would be violated by the enforcement of the rule forbidding employ- ment of both husband and wife in the State departments, and we express no opinion as to the probable effect of such requirement, standard or stipulation, if such were present. We trust that what we have sald fully answers your inquiry. OS-MR-WC Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS APPROVED DEC 14, 1945 s/Grover Sellers By s/Ocle Speer ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Ocle Speer Approved Opinion Committee by s/ Assistant BWB Chairman

Document Info

Docket Number: O-6985

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1946

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017