Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1947 )


Menu:
  •           T~EATTORNEY             GENERAL
    OF    ?t-EXAS
    PRICE DANIEL
    ATTORNEYGENERAL
    the caption.    Montgomery C’ounty was named in the bedy or
    ,the law., but mas not aWed in the caption,.   The Court .said:
    -0 da find, however, that in the body or
    the Bill there appears for the first   time the
    County or Montgomery as one entitled   to rote up-
    on such local issue.   By reason. 0r the railure
    to give notice in the caption that Montgomery
    was to be added to such list of counties,    we
    think the inclusion  of ,Montgomerg County there-
    inwas wid and inerrmtire.``
    The case of Ward Cattle and Pasture Company vs.
    Qarpe&te&?,       Ter. 103, 
    200 S.W. 521
    ; oited in your letter,
    109
    is via ,acoord~ with the Winslow oase.   In that case Matagorda
    County .*&8 Ineluded    in, ArQale 6964 but ‘was omittea   from the
    later Aot without mentionfng the omission in the caption&
    The bomt held that the omfesion W that county f%m the cap-
    tion, was ,deceptiye and did not Cake the achutf       out of the
    p~risloks    ,or then lew.
    All laws which arrested tba pertimqt        atetus or
    Qrshge County were superseded by the last ,amendment of Arti-
    Olij'@9,64, which was passed 6s House Bill No. 150, Chaptdr
    2&i, Acts;of the 4Sth Legisletura,       p. 393, b&y     “Am Act
    amendgy AptidLe      6954 or the Perised E+itutes     or Texas or
    19.23``as the s6me has ;b,een heretofore     aaeaded so 7s to per-
    mit oertafn   oountfes   to hare a stork   law electis&~   and de-
    alsrimg;    an emqrigenoj.n   mat   asptia*   is   strifioieat   to   ux-
    prera the smbjeot or the b&11, (Is required by Seat ion 35
    ai Artiole  III of the State ~omstitu~ioa.    Oreage County is
    mot ramed ,Jn either the aaptisn sr b,od,y of that amendment
    *hiah beaame effective  May 7, 1943.
    We are of the opinion that Orange County is not
    authorlse& to hold an election    to determine whether horses,
    mules, ,jacks, jennets and aattle may run at large in the
    oatuty or in amy sub-division    of it, by reason of its ox-
    olurioa .fyom the amendment or Article     6954, by the 4Bth
    Legislature   in lW3i   Prior legiela~tlre   history on the point
    is immaterial ,.                    .
    Orange County having been omitted ir.mm the
    title  mad alro iron the body of House bill  MO. 150,
    dote of the 48th Legislature,  p. ‘393, amending Ar-
    $i,ole 3854, v. a. s., whlah authorizes  named ooun-
    ties to hoLd eleotioar to determine if horses,
    *
    ,
    .   .
    Honorable Orahaii'BZuce - Page 3
    BP
    Amfste6t
    ,.. .
    ’
    ,*
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-254

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1947

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017