Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1947 )


Menu:
  • . -r-
    Honorable George H. Sheppard
    Comptroller   of Public Accounts
    Austin,  Texas              Opinion         Wo, P-253
    Re:    The a plicability   of
    the 1,# sales tax to
    a sale by a new car
    dealer  to a used car
    dealer.
    Dear Mr. Sheppard:
    You have requested      the opinion   of   this   Depart-
    ment based    upon the following      fact situation:
    "A manufacturer    of motor vehicles
    sells  a motor vehicle    to an authorized
    new car dealer.     After the sale is made
    the authorized   new car dealer   sells    the
    car to a used car d~ealer, operating       in
    some other Dart of the State of Texas,
    and the used car d~ealer resells     thjs    I
    car to an individual     who is required    to
    pay a 1% sales   tax."
    Your first   question    is:
    "Will it be necessary       for this used
    car dealer   to register     the car and pay a
    1% sales tax before      offering    the car for
    sale or d~oes this used car dealer have
    the same right to sell        a new unregistered
    car as a first    sale,   even though he does
    not hold a contract      with any manufacturer
    to sell   new cars?"
    The pertinent parts of Chapter 184, Article
    VI, Acts of the 47th Legislature,   1941 (codified as
    Article  7047k, Vernon's Civil Statutes)  follows:
    "Sec.    1.   (a) There fs hereby levied
    a tax upon every retail     sale of every
    motor vehicle    sold in this State,   such
    tax to be equal to one (1) per cent of
    Hon. Geo.    H. Sheppard,     Page 2     (V-253)
    the total     consideration,    paid or to be
    paid to the seller        by the buyer, whSch
    consideration      shall   include    the amount
    paid or to be paid for said motor ve-
    ,hicle   and all accessories        attached
    thereto   at the time of the sale,          whether
    such consideration        be in the n~ature of
    cash, credit,      or exchange of other pro-
    pe rty , or a combination       of these.
    I, D .   s
    “Sec.   3 (a) The term ‘sale         or
    ‘sales’    as herein used shall         Include   in-
    stallment     and credit    sales,     and the ex-
    change of property,        as well as the sale
    thereof    for money, every closed          transactfon
    constituting     a sale.     The transaction        whereby
    the possession      of property      is transferred
    but, the seller     retains    title    as security
    for the payment of the price shall be deem-
    ed a sale.
    tail   ‘%~, The term ‘retail     sale’ or sre-
    ’ as herein used~ shall     include
    all sales of motor vehicles      except those
    whereby the purchaser    acquires    a motor ve-
    hicle  for the exclusive   purpose of resale
    and not for use.
    YZec.   5.    The taxes levied        in thfs
    Article     shall   be collected       by the Assessor
    and Collector       of taxes of the county fn
    which any such motor vehicle             is first     reg-
    istered     or first     transferred     after   such a
    sale;    the Tax Collector         shall   refuse to ac-
    cept for reqistration           or for transfer       any
    motor vehicle        until   the tax thereon is paid.
    . . . I,
    It will  be noted that 
    Section 5 supra
    ,  re-
    quires    the 1% sales tax to be collected         by the Tax
    Collector     of the County in which the motor vehfcle          is
    first   registered    or first    transferred   after  such sale,
    Therefore    the statutes     which qovern the registration
    of the motor vehicle       must be considered      in oarrf materia
    with the statute      imposing the sales      tax.
    Hon. Geo.    H. Sheppard,      Page 3     (V-253)
    The "Certificate    of Title Act",  codified   as
    Article  1436-1, Vernon's    Penal Code, (Acts 46th Legis-
    lature,  1939, p0 602) has been construed     by the Supreme
    Court of Texas in the case of Motor Investment        Co. v,
    Knox City,  174 S-W, (2d) 482, which involved      a fact sit-
    uation somewhat similar     to the one above stated,
    The pertinent       parts   of   the   Court's   opinion   are
    here   quoted:
    "Ford Motor Company manufactured            an
    automobile       and sold it in ~due course to
    Boling-Duggan,        a partnership,     a dealer    in
    Dallas,      and delivered     the manufacturerss
    certificate       along with the automobile,         On
    March 7, 1940, Boling-Duggan            sold the ve-
    hicle    to R. M. Hedrick,       taking, a chattel
    mortgage lien for $770 of the sale price,
    Boling-Duggan        delivered   the manufacturer's
    certificate       to its vendee Hedrick at the
    time of the sale,         but did not note thereon
    the above lien0          Hedrick purchased the auto-
    mobile for the purpose of converting              it into
    a fire     truck and reselling        it to a consumer.
    After having so converted           it, Hedrick,     on
    the 30th day of April,          1940, for a valuable
    consideration        sold and delivered      the automo-
    bile    to the City of Knox City.           At that time
    said automobile         had not been previously        reg-
    istered      with nor licensed      by the State Hfgh-
    way Department of the State of Texas,               D e 0
    "The Certificate      of Title   Act, Article
    1436-1, VernonPs Penal Codes was enacted by
    the Legislature       of this State in 1939 to less-
    en Andy prevent      the theft    of motor vehicles,
    and the importation        into this State of and
    traffic     in stolen    motor vehicles,     and the
    sale of encumbered motor vehicles            without dis-
    closure    of existing     liens,     The pertinent
    provisions     of the Act are as follows:
    "'Sec.   4.  The term 'Owner' includes        any
    person,    firm, association,       or corporation   other
    than manufacturer,        importer,   distributor,   or
    dealer    claiming  title    to, or having a right to
    operate    pursuant to a lien on a motor vehicle
    after the first     sale as herein defined,        a 0 o
    Hon. Geo.   H. Sheppard,                       Page 4   (V-253)
    "'Sec.     7. The term 'First        Sale'
    means the bargain,       sale,    transfer    or
    delivery      within this State with intent
    to pass an interest        therein,     other than
    a lien of a motor vehicle           which has not
    been previously      registered      or licensed
    in this State.
    "'        . . .
    "'Sec.  9.    The term 'Mew Car' means
    a motor vehicle      which has never been the
    subject    of a first-sale.
    ./r. .I
    .       .        .
    't7Sec.' 19. The term 'Dealer'   means
    any person purchasing    motor vehicles   for
    resale    at retail to owners.
    "'        . . .
    "'Sec.    27.   Before selling      or dispos-
    ing of any motor vehicle          required   to be
    registered      or licensed     in this State on any
    highway or public        place within this State,
    except with dealer's         metal or cardboard      li-
    cense number thereto         attached    as now provid-
    ed by law, the owner shall make application
    to the designated        agent in the county of his
    domicile      upon form to be prescribed        by the
    Department for a certificate           of title   for
    such motor vehicle.
    "1.           .       .'
    "Section    27 of the Act is the section
    which requires      the procurement   of a certif-
    icate   of title    as a condition   precedent    to
    the right to transfer       a motor vehicle.      By
    the ternis of that section       such certificate
    of title     is required  for motor vehicles       'ra-
    quired to be registered       or linensed     in this
    State,    on any highway or pubi%       plane within
    thisState'.       . . .
    1( . . .
    .
    Hon. Geo.     R. Sheppard,       Page 5       (V-253)
    "Moreover,         under said Section            27,
    it is only an 'owner? of a motor vehicle
    that is requirrd           to register         such vehicle
    and secure a certificate                of title       therefor
    before    selling      the same.         The tern towner,p
    as defined       in Section       4, excludesmanufac-
    tures and dealers,            and includes          only those
    claimin?     title      'after    the     first     sale.'       The
    Act divides       sales     of Automobiles           into two
    classes,     namely ?first           sale'     and 'subsequent
    sale.'     The term 'first            sales'means          a trans-
    fer of a vehicle           which has not previously
    been registered           (Sec.   71, as distinpuished
    from a 'subsequent            sale,'     meanin? a transfer
    after a vehicle           has been registered              or should,
    in law, have been registered                    (Sec. 8)"        Read-
    ing the Act as a whole, we think it clear
    that every transfer             of a motor vehicle,              re-
    gardless     of the number thereof,                from manufac-
    turer to dealer,           dealer to dealer,            and from
    dealer    to 'owner,s         as define-the                 Act,
    constitutes        a 'first      sale,s      and that it is
    not necessary         that the vehicle            he recs=ed
    and a certificate           of title        thereto     obtained
    as a condition         precedent        toTbe       valrdfty      of
    such 'first        sale,'"      IEmphasis         added)
    In view of the foregoing      construction    of the
    law it is not necessary      for the used car dealer to reg-
    ister  the new car and since the motor vehicle         was ac-
    nuired by him for the "exclusive       purpose of resalev',      it
    is exempt from the motor vehicle       retail   sales tax under
    the provisions    of Section    3 (b), Article    
    71347k, supra
    .
    Your   second     question      is:
    Would~ it make any difference   i~f the car
    bought by the used car dealer    from the ori,ginnl
    nuthorived  nevl car dealer was a secondhand    car:"
    It is presumed that the secondhand motor vehicle
    is a 'Used Car" as d~efined by Section  10, Article 1436-1,
    Vernon's  Penal Code, as follows:
    "The term 'Used Cars means a motor ve-
    hicle    that has been the subject of a first
    ” .-
    Hon. Geo.    H. Sheppard,       Page 6    (V-253)
    sale whether     within    this    State    or else-
    where."
    This sale constitutes          a "Subsequent         Sale as
    defined  in Section   8, Article         1436-1,  Vernon's        Penal
    Cod~e, as follows:
    "The term 'Subsequent      Sale'   means
    the bargain,    sale,   transfer,    or delivery
    within this State,      with intent     to pass
    an interest    therein,    other than a lien
    of a motor vehicle      which has been register-
    ed or licensed     within this State or when
    it has not been required        under law to be
    registered    or licensed     in this State."
    Nevertheless,      the "Used car" being acquired
    by the used car dealer      for the "exclusive   purpose of
    resale",  the transaction      is exempt from the pa,vment of
    the l$ quoted retail     sales tax under the provisions     of
    Section  3 (b) of Article      
    7047k, supra
    .
    SUMMARY
    A new motor vehicle      acquired     from the
    manufacturer     by a car dealer,       who in turn
    sells   the vehicle    to a used car dealer,         need
    not be registered      under the provisions         of
    the "Certificate     of Title     Act",   Article    1436-1,
    Vernon's    Penal code, and is not subject           to the
    1% motor vehicle     retail    sales    tax, (Article
    ?047k, Vernon's     Civil   Statutes)     when acquired
    by the used car dealer       for the "exclusive        pur-
    pose of resale".      Motor Investment         Co. v. Knox
    City,   
    141 Tex. 530
    , 174 S.W. (2d) 482.             A
    "Used" car sold by a "New car" de-ler             to a
    "Used Car" dealer who acquires           it for the "ex-
    elusive    purpose of resale",        is exempt from the
    1% retail    motor vehicle     retail    sales tax.     Art-
    icle   7047k, Sec. 3 (b).
    Yours'very     truly,
    Edd                               ATTORNEYGENERAL0
    @qgy&J&
    ATTORNEYGENERAL                   BY
    C. K. Richards
    CKR/lh:jrb                                             Assistant
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-253

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1947

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017