Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1947 )


Menu:
  • ,                                              R-521
    =E   ATTOKNEY               GENERAL.
    Q,P TEXAS
    AUemIN    11. -rExAla
    June 12, 1947
    Honorable Geo. B. Sheppard
    Comptroller of Public Accounts
    Austin, Texas             Opinton No. V-240
    Re:     Effective date
    of appropriatlon
    provided in 3. B.
    Dear Mr. Sheppard:                 351
    Your letter request reads as followa:
    "Senate Bill No. 351, Acts of the 50th
    Legislature, Increases the salary of the As-
    sistant District Attorney of the 72nd Judi-
    cial District of Texas and authorizes said
    salary to be paid out of the General Revenue
    Fund of the State. This bill carried thfi'
    emergency clause and passed each House by'a
    record vote, msking it effective upon May
    20, the date it was approved by the Governor.
    The bill also carries the Comptroller's Cer-
    Uficate to the effect that the amount appro-
    priated therein comes within the estimated
    available revenue.
    "But upon reading Section 3, there Is
    some doubt in this department as to whether
    the bill in fact mskes an appropriation for
    the two-year period beginning May 20, 1947,
    and ending May 20, 1949.
    "I shell thank you to advise whether or
    not the bill makes the appropriation avail-
    able lmmedlatelg."
    You also furnished us with a copy of S. B. 351.
    This copy does not show that it passed the House by the
    necessary emergency vote. It also contains a Committee
    Admendment, that strikes out all of Section 3, and ln-
    serts In lleu thereof an entirely different provision
    as to the payment of the salary OF said assistant.
    Honorable Geo. B. Sheppard - Page 2
    However, we examined S.B. 351 'as signed by
    the Governor and find that It finally passed both
    houses by the necessary emergency vote, and that such
    bill passed as originally enacted by the Senate with-
    out such amendment.
    Section 3 of S.B. 351 reads as follows:
    9ec. 3. The Assfstant District
    Attorney In the 72nd Judicial District
    of Texas shall receive an annual salary
    of Thirty-Eight Hundred ($3800.00) Dol-
    lars, payable monthly, out of the General
    Revenue Fund of the state not otherwise
    appropriated, upon the sworn account of
    such Assistant District Attorney, approv-
    ed by the Dlstrlct Attorney of said 72nd
    Judicial Dlstrict.g
    Section 6 of Article VIII of the Texas Con-
    stitution provides that:
    n'. . . no money shall be drewn from
    the treasury but In pursuance of specific
    appropriations mcldeby law; nor shall any
    appropriation of money be made for a longer
    term than two years, except by the first
    legislature to assemble under this con-
    stitution, which may make the necessary ap-
    propriations to carry on the government un-
    til the assemblage of the sixteenth legla-
    1ature.l . . .*
    The question arlses, does Section 3 make an
    appropriation to pay the salary of said Asslstant Dis-
    trict Attorney?   It 1s clear that an appropriation ten
    be msde other then in the general appropriation bill.
    !I ;t;tet$y the Supreme Court in Pickle v. Finley,
    . .     : "It Is also true that no specific vords
    are necessary ln order to make an appropriation; and
    that an appropriation wy be wde by lmplica-
    tl&'when the language employed leads to the belief
    that such was the Intent of the leglsleture." 'Ihe
    Conrt in Nichols v. Comptroller, 4 Stew. end PI 1%
    held that an appropriation had been made when the law
    which fixed the salerg;in question ues couched in the
    following language: A salary of $1,749, to be paid
    quarterly out of any money not othellrlseapproprla.ted".
    ,
    Honorable Geo. H. Sheppard - Page 3
    The Supreme Court In Pickle v. Finley (supra) in ap-
    proving said holding said: "The phrase 'not other-
    wise appropriated' means not appropriated, to any
    other purpose than here Is appropriated, and clearly
    implies an Intent to wke a present appropriation."
    It Is, therefore, our opinion that S.B. 351
    mskes the appropriation available lmmedlately.
    SUMMARY
    S.B. 351 wkes an appropriation of
    Seventy Six Hundred ($7600.00) Dollars to
    pay the salary of the Assistant District
    Attorney  of the 72nd Judicial District of
    Texas for the two year period beginning
    on the 20th day of May, 1947, and ending
    on the 19th day of May, 1949.
    Your   very   truly,
    A=BEBEBALOFTJSXAS
    By   w
    U. V. Geppert
    Assistant
    WVG/lh
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-248

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1947

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017