Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1947 )


Menu:
  •                             A            NEY      GENERAL
    TEXAS
    PRICE   DANIEL
    ATTORNEY GENERA,.
    June 12,     1947
    lgm. IL w, Jones               Cp%nion No. V*246
    aounty Auditor
    Oaines County                  R0:   Authority of the
    Seminole * TMes                      Gonmissioners’ court
    00 or&or the lssuanoa
    oi sarlp warrants for
    the payment of claims
    against the Road and
    Bridge Fund under the
    faots presented.
    Bear sir:                                                          V
    Your request for 48 oplnjen from this     Depart-
    nnat      on the above subject matter is as follows:
    Vaines County’s Road and Bridge
    Revenue is ia turn transferred    to the
    funds of the rour precinots.     When the
    funds of one precinct   are exhausted,
    &as the Commissioners Court havs the
    euthority  to order the issuance of
    serlpt warrants in paymeat of claims
    M&inat that     recinct for servioes   and
    matrrpials as f ong as theye is a balance
    tQ the credit of all oi the Class 2
    lrunb38a6 4 whole?” ,;
    Ps answer to our request for additional in-
    iormation we have received your letter of Ray 9th wht8h
    is ia part as follows:
    The l&47 budget approprlatod
    iunds%ounting    to $75 773 70 for the
    oPerationa of Preeindt’#e,“the  preolnct
    Of this amount, more than
    6,OOO.QO has been expended or W$ll )e
    payab&e by May 31,    1941,
    ‘2.   The script warrants   ii ib8u8a,
    can be redeemed in November, 1947, from
    moon; ‘jeoelved   in the Ootober tax colleo-
    A large portion or our valuations
    bging’~rom oil, we &oe oonsistently      cob
    leoted approximately    9C$ of the taxes           .
    Baa. II.w. JOEWJ - Page 2      (V-240)         ’
    u60880ain Ootobor. Oi        oourae,   this
    will um up’s large portian of the
    mney nmded for the 1940 opdratioos
    of the preoiaot.”
    In the dam of Austin Brol. t, Montague
    fhanty, 
    291 S.W. 628
    , rerrraed~ on etL*t pelats    10 8.W.
    (24) 718, It was held that whore e oounff had hmwd
    warrants ior the payment of ‘road laaohinrry. and said war-
    rants were not intended to be paid out ot eurrdot ray*&
    mos the warrmto nro toil. We quote from.tildOlJr?
    ieB che r0iad8gi
    *arot1eB 7, rtti     11, 01 am QQI-
    ltitmtiodaolare8,
    n,             so far a #
    port&
    Bee, that:
    "'Ii0debt iOr any purpoeo &all
    over be Incurred In azq manner by any
    oity~or oountrunleor .protlsloa     is
    mude at the time of orutlng       the sam,
    ‘ior iev~lng ‘~4 ooll*odbg    a auffioiut
    tm' to pay the lrtrrret    theroon ud pro-
    rldo at least 2$ a8 a siaktng fund’.
    *It mm8 clear,       both by the terms          ‘I.
    OS the warrants and from’the testimony
    OS the oopllplailioners, that’ ths mum8
    spo+tlrd  in the warrants were not to k
    peid out ot the ourrent funds of the year
    at their lssuanoe.  This being trur, WI .‘:~..,,
    US@k there can be no question under the
    ltNhorltiee but that the obligation oea-
    rtttutrd 'a d&t' wlthin the reanl~& lf
    the conatitutlaul               we have
    provisierr
    quoted.
    “In the ease of Mcilefll v. City of
    Waoo, 89 Tax. 83, 
    33 S.W. 322
    , It wu
    said on this aubjrot by our Supnm Ceurt:
    “‘la   .oblf@Aon    binding the tit      to
    :        pat for a matter relating   to its ord In ary
    expoaao#, suoh paymeint being,! in oontempl&
    %i$  ofa$   e;r”lom#``‘,b&ul``“~ :a&
    ia whioh tb l~nditura   18 mado, or an
    fun4a rm h e n4
    lmfulljl lpplioablo there L
    Hon. M. W. Jones - Page 3       (V-246)
    would be~.....
    a debt, within
    -        the meaning of
    the Consz,itutzon. a
    ."Inthe case of City of Terre11 v.
    Dessaint   
    71 Tex. 770
    , 
    9 S.W. 593
    our
    Supreme 6ourt also said on the suijeot:
    "'IYe freely 00nOeae    that debts fork
    the ordinary running expenses, of a city,
    payable within a year out of the incoming
    revenues of the year, and with other in-
    debtedness notclearly       in excess of the
    yearly ~iricome ror genesal purposes, can
    be oreatea by a city.       But we think that
    a debt for current expenses in oraer to
    bd valid, without a ccunpliance with the
    oopstitutional     and statutory   requirements
    to which we have referred,       must run oon-
    currently    with the ourrent resour‘bes for
    such purposes,     and that such a debt can-
    not be created wlthout such compliance,
    which matures at suoh a time as would make
    it a charge upon the future resouroes of
    the city.“’
    Unaer Article 689a-B-11, V.C.S.,   the budget
    whioh Is prepared in July ‘and adopted in August seems
    to be tied to the tax levy made in August for taxes
    which are to beocme due and payahle.da Ootober 1st.
    This IS made manifest by that ,part of Article   689a-11
    xwaing   as follows:
    after bo made eroopt in strict compliance
    with the budget as adopted by the court.”
    (Empbe~is  added,)
    The buaget referred   to here his the budget for
    the fo&lg*ing oalendar gear.     The taxee levied in Au-
    gtteton the ba8ie of the August budget are taxes which
    io contemplation  of Artlole   689a are to be applied to
    the expenditures  for the lollowing   calendar year. This
    praatloe of Ieryw    taxes in August for use in the
    ..
    ’   ,
    Blr,   
    Id. W. Jones
    .- Page 4            (V-246)
    tollowing   c~lw44er yerr roLke&rU          fn praotioe~&til
    the Le.gislmepn pasacd Artiole        W??Wb .V.C.S,, all.owiaS
    a ait300m    on a& valormu texea paid la advancem PFiW
    to this law, most, 01 the tar.8 levied $0 Au@uat wru
    id b J-y        of the fallming      year; immediately W-
    Pore they beetum delinquent on Februar           1st.   &tZok
    7336, V,C.+     Uter oa&etmAt        of Articfe   db      the m
    at the tax44 l*ti*b     in August ah pala ,k Botider         C*
    Taabor an4              telltmllog,   b ordsll te tab &@B-
    we    oi the?%%%.           )his,   however,, yllr yr) ,rL’yr
    the faOt that %*r*g eolleatrd        in Oatobm, Ila*aaabar ad
    TMmmber l#l     ~,waler the 1947 aaselraplant cars to be’usod
    fur 194% opwetloa8~
    ‘.              Ia vicaw’o? the foregoing    authotttisr,   r.orlp
    werrmts   mannot now be Issued that will have to b+ MC
    deesad out of taxes aolleotad     under 1947 aar*cl8tiat;r
    for rwh taxes are revenues for 1948 operatloar~Ut$ iW
    0uPwat PeT(lnae4. Under the faotr sutmltted,         the-
    has already been expensed all but $9,773.70 of, the a-’
    mount appropriated   under the 1947 budgrt for Praoioot
    k    the reoinot iLu quoation,     It is, therefore,     mr
    optplan %hat rorip watrmts up to $9 773.70 sag be Is-
    luII if they are within ~the reasoaebij     antiolpated
    ourrent revenues for 1947.     It is our further opinion
    that AO eorip w&grant8 may be lsmued that are intended
    to be paid out of reoemer     for 1948 or any future peas..
    &rip wakants ,011county road’and
    bridge fund may be issued by a county
    In an amount equal to the aifferenae  be-
    tween the sum of money already expended
    and the amount appropriated  in 1946 for
    the 1947 budget, provided such warrants
    are ulthin the reasonably anticipated
    .ourrent revenues for the calendar year
    1947,
    .
    Taxes oolleotad       In October, Rovesber
    amI Deeember,     1947,    under   the 1947 assess-
    .             .
    .. .                            .
    :’
    Ifm. M, 1. Jctner - P8&0      5’    (r-248)
    op~r88       and 8m   not    mmnt       m*awo(I
    .
    fours   very truly,
    ATTORNEY GEIIZUX.' OT TX&3
    BY
    fagan Dl ckson
    rD/lh   :wtl                            First Assietant
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-246

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1947

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017