Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG         ABBOTT
    May 7,2012
    The Honorable Mike Hamilton                                  Opinion No. GA-0926
    Chair, Committee on Licensing and
    Administrative Procedures                               Re: Whether a website may charge a fee to
    Texas House of Representatives                               participants who answer questions for the
    Post Office Box 2910                                         opportunity to win prizes (RQ-1011-GA)
    Austin, Texas 78768-2910
    Dear Representative Hamilton:
    You describe an e-commerce website that offers an opportunity, after the payment of an entry
    fee, for members of the public to participate in a contest that awards prizes. I You reference the
    website's proposed contest rules and seek an opinion on the legality of the contest. See Request
    Letter at 1 (referring to contest rules, available at https://holeykow.com). You ask whether it is a
    "violation of Texas law for an e-commerce site to permit visitors to pay an entry fee for an
    opportunity to take a quiz that would test their knowledge, skill and speed, if the contestants with
    the best overall scores were awarded valuable prizes[.]" Request Letter at 1.
    The contest requires participants to pay an entry fee to take a quiz of up to 100 multiple
    choice2 questions, the subject matter of which is unknown until the participant sets up an account
    and pays the nonrefundable entry fee. See "How our contests work," at Nos. 2, 5, available at
    https://holeykow.comlindex.php?action=help/3. The participant's task is to pick the" 'most correct'"
    answer for each question. 
    Id. at No.2.
    The quiz is also timed, and the participant's quiz completion
    time is used to determine a winner among participants with the same number of correct answers.
    See 
    id. at No.4.
    The winner receives a prize selected and offered by the website operator, but the
    prize comes directly from a third-party vendor or merchant. See "Our Official Contest Rules,
    Regulations and Disclaimers-Products, Services and the Award Process," at A, available at
    https://holeykow.com/index.php?action=help/8. You are primarily concerned about whether the
    entry fee required to participate in the online contest constitutes a "bet" in violation of the Penal
    Code's gambling prohibitions. See Request Letter at 1-2 (discussing meaning of the term "bet").
    lLetter from Honorable Mike Hamilton, Chair, House Comm. on Licensing & Admin. Procedures, to Honorable
    Greg Abbott, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 1 (Oct. 21, 2011), http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opin ("Request Letter").
    2The contest rules also state that "[q]uizzes may be of any format such as a brief essay, multiple choice, fill in
    the blanks, select and match or any combination of these" at the discretion of the website operator. "How our Contests
    Work," at No.5, available at hUps:llholeykow.comlindex.php?action=help/3 (last visited Apr. 24, 2012).
    The Honorable Mike Hamilton - Page 2           (GA-0926)
    Thus, we limit our opinion to a consideration of the relevant Texas Penal Code provision. Cf Tex.
    Att'y Gen. Op. No. DM-344 (1995) at 3, 5 (discussing federal laws relevant to computer gaming).
    Subsection 47.01(1) of the Penal Code defines "bet" to mean "an agreement to win or lose
    something of value solely or partially by chance. A bet does not include ... (B) an offer of a prize,
    award, or compensation to the actual contestants in a bona fide contest for the determination of skill,
    speed, strength, or endurance .... " TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 47.01(1)(B) (West 2011). You
    describe the contest about which you inquire as one involving knowledge, skill, and speed. See
    Request Letter at 1. While we do not opine on the legality of any particular contest, we advise you
    generally that if the online contest is in actuality one of skill or speed, and does not involve an
    element of chance, a court could conclude that this arrangement falls within the scope of subsection
    (B) and is excluded from the definition of a bet. See 
    id. § 47.01(1)(A)-(B);
    but see Tex. Att'y Gen.
    Op. No. GA-0335 (2005) at 4 ("If an element of chance is involved in a particular game, it is
    embraced within the definition of 'bet. ''').
    You also raise the possibility that the online contest could implicate chapters 2001 and 2002
    of the Occupations Code, which govern bingo and charitable raffles, respectively. See TEX. aCe.
    CODE ANN. §§ 2001.001-.657 (West 2012) ("Bingo Enabling Act"), 2002.001-.058 ("Charitable
    Raffle Enabling Act"). Under chapter 2001, "bingo" is defined as "a specific game of chance,
    commonly known as bingo or lotto, in which prizes are awarded on the basis of designated numbers
    or symbols conforming to randomly selected numbers or symbols." [d. § 2001.002(4). Chapter 2002
    defines a "raffle" to mean "the award of one or more prizes by chance at a single occasion among
    a single pool or group of persons who have paid or promised a thing of value for a ticket that
    represents a chance to win a prize." [d. § 2002.002(6). These definitions refer to specific types of
    games of chance that the Legislature has authorized under other circumstances and do not on their
    face appear to apply to the online contest that you describe.
    The Honorable Mike Hamilton - Page 3        (GA-0926)
    SUMMARY
    The mere payment of an entry fee to participate in a contest
    that tests skill or speed, and that does not involve an element of
    chance, could be found not to constitute a bet under subsection
    47.01(l)(B) of the Texas Penal Code.
    Very truly yours,
    ~
    BOTT
    Attorney General of Texas
    DANIEL T. HODGE
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID J. SCHENCK
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    JASON BOATRIGHT
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Charlotte M. Harper
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-0926

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017