Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG        ABBOTT
    June 29, 2009
    The Honorable Jeff Wentworth                             Opinion No. GA-0724
    Chair, Committee on Jurisprudence
    Texas State Senate                                       Re: Authority of local taxing units or central
    Post Office Box 12068                                    appraisal districts to collect special assessments
    Austin, Texas 78711                                      imposed in public improvement districts
    (RQ-0774-GA)
    Dear Senator Wentworth:
    You ask whether a central appraisal district or a local taxing unit, such as a county, may
    contract to collect assessments imposed by a public improvement district ("district").! The Public
    Improvement District Assessment Act (the "Act"),2 Local Government Code chapter 372, subchapter
    A, authorizes a municipality to establish a district to help finance public improvements within the
    district's boundaries. See TEx. Loc. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 372.003 (Vernon 2005). The municipal
    governing body "shall apportion the cost of an improvement to be assessed against property" in the
    district "on the basis of special benefits accruing to the property because of the improvement."
    Id § 372.015(a). The governing body levies and collects assessments, also known as "special
    assessments," on property within the district. See id §§ 372.016, .017, .018(b). If a land ownerin
    the district does not pay the assessment against his property, "[a]n assessment ... , with interest, the
    expense of collection, and reasonable attorney's fees, if incurred, is a first and prior lien against the
    property assessed, superior to all other liens and claims except liens or claims for state, county,
    school district, or municipality ad valorem taxes." Id § 372.018(b). The lien "maybe enforced by
    the governing body in the same manner that an ad valorem tax lien against real property may be
    enforced by the governing body," and "[d]elinquent installments of the assessment shall incur
    interest, penalties, and attorney's fees in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes." 
    Id. You first
    inquire whether Tax Code section 6.24 authorizes a contract between a municipality
    and a central appraisal district or a local taxing unit to collect special assessments imposed in a
    public improvement district. See Request Letter at 1,3. Section 6.24 is found in the Property Tax
    Code, Texas Tax Code title 1, which applies to local entities authorized to impose ad valorem taxes
    IRequest Letter at 1 (available at http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov).
    2TEX. Loc. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 372.001 (Vernon 2005).
    The Honorable Jeff Wentworth - Page 2                      (GA-0724)
    on property.3 See TEX. TAX CODE ANN. §§ 1.01 (short title), 1.02 (applicability of title 1 to taxing
    units), 1.04(12) (defining "taxing unit" as a political unit of the state authorized to impose ad
    valorem taxes) (Vernon 2008). Section 6.24 of the Tax Code authorizes the governing body ofa
    taxing unit to contract with another taxing unit or with an appraisal district board "to perform duties
    relating to the assessment4 or collection of taxes." 
    Id. § 6.24(a)
    (footnote added); see also 
    id. § 6.24(b)
    (procedure for county contracts). Section 6.24, read in its statutory context, relates to the
    assessment and collection of ad valorem taxes. See TEx. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 311.011(a) (Vernon
    2005) (words and phrases shall be read in context). An "appraisal district" appraises property in the
    district "for ad valorem tax purposes of each taxing unit that imposes ad valorem taxes on property
    in the district." TEx. TAX CODE ANN. § 6.01(b) (Vernon 2008). Accordingly, section 6.24
    authorizes contracts to perform duties relating to the assessment or collection of ad valorem property
    taxes.
    A special assessment, such as an assessment within the Act, is imposed under the taxing
    power, but it is not an ad valorem property tax. See City of Wichita Falls v. Williams, 26 S.W.2d
    910,911-13 (Tex. 1930). An ad valorem property tax is imposed throughoutthe taxing jurisdiction
    for the general support of its government, while a special assessment is imposed only upon the
    property that is specially benefitted by the improvement, and its amount is based on the special
    benefits accruing to the property. See id.; Henry v. Kaufman County Dev. Dist. No.1, 150 S. W.3d
    498,504-05 (Tex. App.-Austin 2004, pet. dism'd by agr.); see also City ofHouston v. Blackbird,
    
    394 S.W.2d 159
    , 162 (Tex. 1965) (amount of assessment for paving improvements cannot exceed
    benefit to property owner). Special assessments are not ad valorem taxes within the Texas
    Constitution. See City of Wichita 
    Falls, 26 S.W.2d at 915
    ; Higgins v. Bordages, 
    31 S.W. 52
    , 54-55
    (Tex. 1895). Moreover, "it has been uniformly held that the word taxes, whether used in an act of
    the legislature, or the charter of a company exempting it from taxation, does not embrace such local
    assessments, unless there be something in the statute or charter to indicate such an intention." City
    ofCisco v. Varner, 16 S.W.2d 265,266 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1929,judgm't affd); see Allen v. City
    of Galveston, 
    51 Tex. 302
    , 320 (1879). Nothing in section 6.24 indicates that the Legislature
    intended it to encompass special assessments. An assessment imposed under the Act is accordingly
    not a tax within Tax Code section 6.24. Based on the plain language of section 6.24, we conclude
    3"An ad valorem tax is levied against property on its value." State v. Wynne, 133 S. W.2d 951,957 (Tex. 1939).
    4The Legislature has defmed the term "assessment" in the Property Tax Code as "a function described by
    Chapter 26, Tax Code, performed by an employee of a political subdivision or by a person acting on behalf of a political
    subdivision to determine an amount of ad valorem tax for the political subdivision." TEX. Occ. CODE ANN. §
    1151.002(2) (Vernon 2004) ( defining "assessment" for purposes ofthe Property Taxation Professional Certification Act,
    
    Id. § 1151.001-.253
    (Vernon 2004 & Supp. 2008». See also Bexar County v. Connell Leasing Co., 
    611 S.W.2d 496
    ,
    498 (Tex. Civ. App.-San Antonio 1981, no writ) (defming "assessment" in Texas Constitution article VIII, section 15
    as "the sum that has been ascertained as the apportioned part of the tax to be charged against the particular piece of
    property," and that it "includes the procedure on the part of officials by which the property is listed, valued, and fmally
    the pro rata tax declared").
    The Honorable Jeff Wentworth - Page 3                     (GA-0724)
    that section 6.24 does not authorize contracts between a municipal governing body and another
    taxing unit or an appraisal district board to collect special assessments imposed under the Act. 5
    You also ask whether authority other than Tax Code section 6.24 would permit a central
    appraisal district or a local taxing unit to collect assessments imposed by a municipality on property
    in a public improvement district. See Request Letter at 1,2. Government Code chapter 791, the
    Interlocal Cooperation Act, authorizes a local government to contract with another local government
    "to perform governmental functions and services in accordance with this chapter." TEx. GOy'T
    CODE ANN. § 791.011(a) (Vernon Supp. 2008), see 
    id. §§ 791.001-.033
    (Vernon 2004 & Supp.
    2008); Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Consolo Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Tex. Political Subdivisions Prop.lCas.
    Joint Self Ins. Fund, 
    212 S.W.3d 320
    (Tex. 2006) (addressing self insurance pools authorized by
    chapter 791 and other statutes). A local government includes a "county, municipality, special
    district, junior college district, or other political subdivision of this state or another state." TEX.
    GOy'TCODEANN. § 791.003(4)(A)(Vernon Supp. 2008). The term "[g]overnmental functions and
    services" is defined as "all or part of a function or service" in any of several areas listed in section
    791.003(3). 
    Id. § 791.003(3).
    The list does not expressly include collecting assessments, and no
    judicial decision or attorney general opinion has considered whether chapter 791 authorizes contracts
    for collecting special assessments. The language of chapter 791 is, however, broad enough to
    include contracts to collect assessments. The statute authorizes contracts for "administrative
    functions," defined as "functions normally associated with the routine operation of government,
    including tax ... collection." 
    Id. § 791.003(1);
    see also 
    id. § 791.003(1)
    (defining "administrative
    functions"); see also 
    id. § 791.003(3)(K)
    (administrative functions are governmental functions). In
    our opinion, the collection of assessments, like the expressly-mentioned tax collection, is a function
    "normally associated with the routine operation of government." 
    Id. § 791.003(1).
    In addition, the
    statute authorizes local governments to contract for "other governmental functions in which the
    contracting parties are mutually interested." 
    Id. § 791.003(3)(N).
    This broad category could include
    the collection of special assessments.
    An interlocal contract under chapter 791 may "provide a governmental function or service
    that each party to the contract is authorized to perform individually." 
    Id. § 791.011(c)(2);
    see Tex.
    Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-O 150 (2004) at 2 (Interlocal Cooperation Act permits an agreement whereby
    the peace officers of one local government serve as law enforcement officers of another local
    government that has law enforcement authority). Thus, a municipality could not contract with an
    appraisal district board for collection of assessments. We believe, however, that a court would find
    that the Interlocal Cooperation Act authorizes a municipality to contract with another local
    government for collecting special assessments imposed in a public improvement district. The local
    government must also have authority to collect assessments for public improvements. Whether a
    particular local governmental entity has the required authority may be determined by examining the
    applicable law.
    5you also ask if a contract under Tax Code section 6.24 for collection of special assessments would have to be
    approved by the comptroller. See Request Letter at 5. In view of our answer to your fIrst question, we need not address
    this question.
    The Honorable Jeff Wentworth - Page 4          (GA-0724)
    SUMMARY
    A special assessment to finance a public improvement is
    imposed only upon the property that is specially benefitted by the
    improvement, and its amount is based on the special benefits accruing
    to the property. A special assessment is imposed under the taxing
    power, but it is not an ad valorem property tax within the Texas
    Constitution, nor does the term "taxation" in statutes ordinarily
    include special assessments.
    Tax Code section 6.24 authorizes contracts between a
    municipal governing body and another taxing unit or an appraisal
    district board to collect ad valorem taxes, but it does not authorize
    contracts to collect special assessments imposed under the Public
    Improvement District Assessment Act, Local Government Code
    chapter 372, subchapterA.
    Pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, a municipal
    governing body may contract for the collection of a special
    assessment it imposes in a public improvement district with another
    local governmental entity that is authorized to collect assessments for
    public improvements.
    ANDREW WEBER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    JONATHANK. FRELS
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    NANCY S. FULLER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Susan L. Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-0724

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017