Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG        ABBOTT
    April 7, 2009
    The Honorable G.A. Maffett, III               Opinion No. GA-0703
    Wharton County Attorney
    309 East Milam, Suite 500                     Re: Authority of a commissioners court to remove fencing
    Wharton, Texas 77488                          located within a county right-of-way (RQ-0749-GA)
    Dear Mr. Maffett:
    You ask whether a county has the "authority to remove fencing located within a county road
    right-of-way that the Commissioners Court determines interferes with the safety and transportation
    of the public[.]"l You describe the nature of the fence at issue as dangerous and tell us that the
    "Commissioners Court determined the fence obstructed the public's ability to safely travel and
    ordered the fence removed .... " Request Letter at 3; see 
    id. (attached Order,
    finding that "fence is
    a hazard and constitutes an obstruction to the public's safety, use and transportation" of the county
    road).
    The Legislature has granted commissioners courts authority to "exercise general control over
    all roads, highways, and bridges in the county." TEx. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 251.016 (Vernon SUpp.
    2008). In addition, section 251.003 of the Transportation Code authorizes a commissioners court
    to "make and enforce all necessary rules and orders for the ... maintenance of public roads." ld.
    § 251.003(a)(1 ) (Vernon 1999). With respectto this general authority, the Texas Supreme Court has
    stated that the "Legislature imposed on [county commissioners courts] a duty to make the roadways
    safe for public travel." City of San Antonio v. City of Boerne, 
    111 S.W.3d 22
    , 31-32 (Tex. 2003)
    (construing statutory predecessor to section 251.0 16). The Transportation Code further provides that
    a public road of all classes must "be clear of all obstructions." ld. § 251.008(1).
    Based on the authority found in the Transportation Code, this office has previously concluded
    that a county commissioners court may remove or order the removal from a county road right-of-way
    objects that create a safety hazard to the public. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. GA-0430 (2006) at
    3-4 (abandoned mobile home); JM-1241 (1990) at 2 (trees or shrubs); M-534 (1969) at 4
    (obstruction). The determination of whether a particular item creates a public safety hazard is a fact
    determination for the commissioners court to make in the first instance, subject to judicial review.
    See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0693 (2009) at 1 (concluding question whether mailboxes create
    a public safety hazard is a fact question not appropriate for the opinion process); Request Letter
    (attached Order, finding that "fence is a hazard and constitutes an obstruction to the public's safety,
    use and transportation" of the county road).
    lSee Request Letter at 1 (available at www.texasattomeygeneral.gov).
    The Honorable G.A. Maffett, III - Page 2      (GA-0703)
    SUMMARY
    A county commissioners court has authority, subject to
    judicial review, to remove from a county road right-of-way objects
    that create a safety hazard to the public.
    Attorney General of Texas
    ANDREW WEBER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    JONATHAN K. FRELS
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    NANCY S. FULLER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Charlotte M. Harper
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-0703

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017