Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNFY GENERAL _ STATE OF TEXAS
    JOHN     CORNYN
    April 29,2002
    The Honorable Charles A. Rosenthal,           Jr.          Opinion No. JC-0497
    Harris County District Attorney
    1201 Franklin Street, Suite 600                            Re: Whether a peace officer is required to attend
    Houston, Texas 77002                                       continuing education courses regarding enforce-
    ment of traffic laws and the use of radar
    equipment   (RQ-047 1-JC)
    Dear Mr. Rosenthal:
    You have requested our opinion as to whether section 644.10 1(d) of the Transportation Code
    currently requires that a peace officer attend continuing education courses “on the enforcement of
    traffic and highway laws and on the use of radar equipment as prescribed by Subchapter F, Chapter
    170 1, Occupations Code.“’ For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that, because of the
    absence of any provisions in subchapter F, chapter 170 1, Occupations Code, that actually prescribe
    such training, a peace officer is not required to attend such courses under that provision.
    Senate Bill 220 from the Seventy-seventh   Legislature               amended     section 644.101 of the
    Transportation Code by adding subsection (d), which provides:
    A sheriff, a deputy sheriff, or any peace officer that does not
    attend continuing education courses on the enforcement of traffic and
    highway laws and on the use of radar equipment as prescribed by
    Subchapter F, Chapter 1701, Occupations Code, shall not enforce
    traffic and highway laws.
    TEX. TRANS.CODE ANN. 9 644.101(d)      (Vernon Supp. 2002); see also Act of June 15,2001,77th
    Leg., RX, ch. 1227, 8 11, sec. 644.101 (d), 2001 Tex. Gen. Laws 2806,2809.
    Subchapter F of chapter 1701 of the Occupations Code directs the Commission on Law
    Enforcement Officer Standards and Education (TCLEOSE) to “establish minimum curriculum
    requirements for preparatory and advanced courses and programs for schools subject to approval
    under Section 1701.25 1(c)( 1)” TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. 5 1701.253(a) (Vernon 2002). Subsection
    (b) of section 1701.253 states that “the commission shall require courses and programs to provide
    ‘Letter from Honorable Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr., Harris County District Attorney, to Honorable John Comyn,
    Texas Attorney General, at 1 (Nov. 27,200l)   (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Request Letter].
    The Honorable   Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr. - Page 2        (JC-0497)
    training” in various areas, such as the investigation of child abuse or neglect, family violence, and
    sexual assault; issues concerning sex offender characteristics; and crime victims’ rights. See 
    id. 9 1701.253(b).
        Subsection (c) directs the commission to “establish a statewide comprehensive
    education and training program on civil rights, racial sensitivity, and cultural diversity.” See 
    id. fj 1701.253(c).
    The Seventy-seventh Legislature amended section 1701.253 to prescribe four new kinds of
    instructional program, each of them designated subsection (e). One of them requires “an education
    and training program on laws relating to the operation of motorcycles and to the wearing of
    protective headgear by motorcycle operators and passengers”; and “education and training on
    motorcycle operation profiling awareness and sensitivity training.” See 
    id. 5 1701.253(e).
    The other
    three versions of subsection (e) relate to “instruction in preventing dual arrest” for training officers
    and recruits; “a statewide comprehensive education program on asset forfeiture”; and “a statewide
    comprehensive education and training program on racial profiling.” See 
    id. Subchapter F
    does not,
    however, prescribe “continuing education courses on the enforcement of traffic laws and on the use
    of radar equipment.” See 
    id. $5 1701.25
    l-.257. Subchapter H of chapter 1701, which specifically
    deals with “continuing education required for peace officers,” also fails to prescribe the kind of
    continuing education courses contemplated by section 644.101 (d) of the Transportation Code. See
    
    id. $5 1701.35
    l-.356. Nor does subchapter G, which treats “license requirements; disqualifications
    and exemptions,” do so. See 
    id. $9 1701.301-.316.
    A bill of the precise kind contemplated by section 644.10 1(d) of the Transportation Code was
    introduced in the Seventy-seventh Legislature by Representative Yvonne Davis as House Bill 3233.
    See Tex. H.B. 3233, 77th Leg., R.S. (2001). That bill would have added section 1701.258 to
    subchapter F of chapter 1701 of the Occupations Code and would have provided:
    Sec.   1701.258.   CONTINUING   EDUCATION   FOR PEACE OFFICERS.      (a)
    A peace officer that currently does not attend continuing education
    courses on the enforcement of traffic and highway laws and does not
    attend a certification course on the use of radar equipment used to
    check the speed of a vehicle shall not enforce traffic and highway
    laws.
    
    Id. The bill
    analysis for House Bill 3233 states:
    House Bill 3233 amends the Occupations Code to prohibit a peace
    officer from enforcing traffic and highway laws if the officer does not
    attend continuing education courses on the enforcement of traffic and
    highway laws and does not attend a certification course on the use of
    radar equipment used to check the speed of a vehicle.
    The Honorable   Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr. - Page 3       (JC-0497)
    HOUSECOMM.ONPUBLICSAFETY,BILLANALYSIS,Tex. H.B. 3233,77th Leg., R.S. (2001). House
    Bill 3233 was not approved by the House Public Safety Committee, never reached the floor of the
    House, and, consequently, never became law.
    Although House Bill 3233 did not detail the curriculum that would have been required
    thereunder, TCLEOSE is granted broad authority to “adopt rules for the administration of’ chapter
    1701, and to “establish minimum standards relating to competence and reliability, including
    education, [and] training.” TEX. Oct. CODEANN. 5 170 1.15 1(l)-(2) (Vernon 2002). Thus, had any
    continuing education courses regarding enforcement of traffic and highway laws and use of radar
    equipment been prescribed by the legislature under subchapter F, chapter 1701, TCLEOSE would
    have been authorized to specify the curriculum for those courses.
    As we have noted, section 644.10 1(d) of the Transportation Code requires a peace officer to
    “attend continuing education courses on the enforcement of traffic and highway laws and on the use
    of radar equipment asprescribed by Subchapter F, Chapter 170 1, Occupations Code.” TEX. TRANSP.
    CODE ANN. 8 644.101(d) (Vernon 2002) (emphasis added).              “Prescribed” means “laid down,
    appointed, or fixed beforehand; ordained, appointed, set, fixed, defined.” XII OXFORDENGLISH
    DICTIONARY 391 (2d ed. 1989). The legislature did not require a peace officer’s attendance at
    courses merely authorized by particular statutes. It required such attendance at courses “set, fixed,
    [and] defined” by those statutes. See 
    id. In our
    opinion, the failure of the legislature to prescribe
    “continuing education courses on the enforcement of traffic and highway laws and on the use of
    radar equipment . . . [under] Subchapter F, Chapter 1701, Occupations Code,” is fatal to the current
    efficacy of section 644.101(d) of the Transportation Code. TEX. TRANSP.CODEANN. 8 644.101(d)
    (Vernon 2002). As the Texas Supreme Court has said, “[wlhen one statute references another
    statute, one must look to the referenced statute to understand the referencing statute.” In re R.J.J.,
    
    959 S.W.2d 185
    , 186 (Tex. 1998). In the case you present, the referenced statute does not exist.
    In Scappaticci v. Southwest Sav. & Loan Ass ‘n, 
    662 P.2d 13
    1 (Ariz. 1983), the Supreme
    Court of Arizona, sitting in bane, declared:
    The Arizona Legislature can incorporate by reference only such laws
    and regulations as exist at the time they enact legislation and cannot
    constitutionally adopt future changes which might occur.
    
    Id. at 13
    5. Other state courts have likewise insisted that incorporation by reference may include only
    acts in existence at the time of the enactment of the referencing statute. See, e.g., Adelman v.
    Onischuck, 135 N.W.2d 670,681 (Minn. 1965) (“our legislature has authority to enact laws which
    refer to existing legislative acts”) (emphasis added); Univ. of S. C. v. Mehlman, 139 S.E.2d 771,774
    (S.C. 1964) (“apart or all of an existing statute may by reference thereto be incorporated into another
    statute.“) (emphasis added); Lassiter v. Northampton County Bd. of Elections, 102 S.E.2d 853,860
    (N.C. 1958) (“‘In the absence of constitutional inhibition part or all of an existing statute may, by
    specific and descriptive reference thereto, be incorporated into another statute.“‘) (emphasis added).
    Because the statute referenced by section 644.101 (d) of the Transportation Code does not presently
    The Honorable    Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr. - Page 4       (JC-0497)
    exist, it necessarily follows that the referencing statute is, at this time, of no effect. As a result, a
    peace officer is not currently required by section 644.101 (d) to attend continuing education courses
    regarding enforcement of traffic and highway laws and the use of radar equipment.
    SUMMARY
    A peace officer is not currently required by section 644.10 1(d)
    of the Transportation Code to attend continuing education courses
    regarding enforcement of traffic and highway laws and the use of
    radar equipment.
    JOHN     CORNYN
    Attorney General of Texas
    HOWARD G. BALDWIN, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    NANCY FULLER
    Deputy Attorney General - General Counsel
    SUSAN DENMON GUSKY
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Rick Gilpin
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JC-497

Judges: John Cornyn

Filed Date: 7/2/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017