Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1992 )


Menu:
  •                           QBfficeof tty !Zlttocnep@enecal
    %tate of lkiae
    DAN MORALES                              July 13,199Z
    ATTORNEYGENERAL
    Honorable D. R. ‘Tom” Uher                 Opinion No. DM-140
    Chairman
    Committee on Redistricting                 Re: The status of the West Braxoria
    Texas House of Representatives             County Drainage District, and related
    P. 0. Box 2910                             questions (RQ-326)
    Austin, Texas 78768-2910
    Dear Representative Uher:
    You have requested our opinion regarding the current status of the West
    Braxoria County Drainage District. That district was created pursuant to article
    XVI, section 59 of the Texas Constitution by a special law enacted in 1969. House
    Bill 273, Acts 1969, 61st Leg., ch. 48, at 139-44, designated the commissioners court
    of Braxoria County “as the governing body of [the] district.” In 1981, the statute was
    amended to provide for “a board of directors composed of five members who shall
    be elected from single-member districts to serve for staggered terms of two years
    and until their successors are elected and have qualified for office.” S.B. 21, Acts
    1981, 67th Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 6, at 58-63. The 1981 legislation directed the existing
    governing board, the commissioners court, “[wlithin 90 days after the effective date
    of this Act,” to “adopt an order establishing the boundaries and numbers for single-
    member board districts.” 
    Id. 8 6(a),
    at 62. The board was also enjoined to “call and
    hold an election on the first Saturday in April 1982, to elect five members to the
    board.” Za! You indicate that the commissioners court has never taken any action
    to implement the requirement of section 6 for establishing single-member districts
    or for holding an election. You ask whether the commissioners court is at present
    “the legally authorized body to act for said drainage district.”
    Senate Bill 21 provides, in pertinent part:
    The commissioners court serving as the governing board of
    the West Brazoria County Drainage District on the effective
    date of this Act shall continue in office and shall exercise the
    powers and duties and perform the functions of the board of
    p.   722
    Honorable D. R. ‘Tom” Uher - Page 2          (DM-140)
    directors of the district until the first elected board members
    have qualified for office.
    . .. .
    The pe.rsons serving on the board of directors of the West
    Brazoria County Drainage District on the effective date of this
    Act shall cominue in office and shall exercise the powers and
    duties and perform the functions of board members tmtil the
    first elected board members have qualified for office.. . .
    Id OQ5,6(b), at 62. Since section 6 of the 1981 legislation was never implemented,
    in that neither an order establishing single-member districts nor an order calling for
    an election to select board members was ever issued, the statute makes clear that
    “the commissioners court serving as the governing board” of the district has
    continued to function as the governing board since 1981. Although the statute
    permits some ambiguity, since it speaks of “the commissioners court serving as the
    governing board . . . on the effective date if this Act,” and of “[t]he persons serving
    ontheboardofdirectors...      on the effective date of this Act,”we believe that it was
    the intent of the legislature to constitute the individual commissioner pa&onr,
    rather than the specificpersonr who held those positions on August 14,1981, as the
    holdover board for the district. Thus, it is the present commissioners court of
    Brazoria County, rather than the commissioners court as it existed on August 14,
    1981, that makes up the current board of the district.
    You also ask whether the commissioners court may establish a tax rate for
    the district and call an election for its approval. You indicate that in 1969 the
    affected electorate “voted for the creation of said drainage district but turned down
    all taxing authority.
    Section 5 authorizes the governing board to “levy and cause to be collected a
    tax not exceeding 10 cents on each SlOOvaluation of taxable property subject to
    district taxation within the district.” Such tax may not be levied or assessed,
    ~however,“until authorized at an election called for such purpose by said board, in
    the manner provided by Section 4, hereof, at which a majority of the qualified
    electors . . . vote in favor of the levy and collection of such tax.” 
    Id. 0 5,
    at 59.
    Nothing in the statute prohibits the governing board from setting a tax rate and
    cdling an election merely because a prior election has resulted in disapproval of the
    p. 723
    Honorable D. R. ‘Tom” Uher - Page 3           (DM-140)
    tax. We conclude, therefore, that the commissioners court, as the current governing
    board of the district, may establish a tax rate and call an election for its approval.
    Your last question is whether the commissioners court may “establish single
    member districts for the election of drainage commissioners without further
    legislation beii passed.” Certainly, the commissioners court, acting as the current
    board, may not do so pursuant to section 6(a) of Senate Bill 21, since that provision
    sets the election for the Crst Saturday in April 1982. Section 2 of Senate Bill 21,
    however, provides, in pertinent part:
    After each decennial census, the board shall divide the area
    of the district into five single-member districts that are compact,
    contiguous, and as nearly equal in population as is
    practicable. . . .
    An election shall be held in the district on the first Saturday
    in April of each year to elect the appropriate number of
    members to the board.
    Id 8 2(c), (d), at 58. Ordinarily, we might be constrained to construe subsections
    2(c) and 2(d) in harmony with subsection 6(a) to infer that the redistricting and
    election provisions of the statute were intended to be applicable only to the election
    contemplated for April 1982. Since the enactment of Senate Bill 21, however, a new
    “decennial census” has been held, and the results thereof armounced, so that it
    seems reasonable to require whatever “board” exists to comply anew with the
    requirements of subsections 2(c) and 2(d). As we have stated, the current “board” is
    the commissioners court of Brazoria County. Accordingly, the board is in a position
    to, and, in our opinion, is commanded, to comply with those requirements by
    dividing the area into “five single-member districts” based on the 1990 census, and
    calling an election for the first Saturday in April 1993, to fill the directorships from
    those districts.
    SUMMARY
    The commissioners court of Brazoria County at present
    constitutes the governing board of the West Brazoria County
    Drainage District. As such, it may set a tax rate and call an
    election to seek voter approval therefor. The commissioners
    p. 724
    Honorable D. R. ‘Tom” Uher - Page 4       (DM-140)
    court, acting as the board, should establish single-member
    districts based on the 1990 census, and call an election for the
    first Saturday in April 1993.
    DAN      MORALES
    Attorney General of Texas
    WILL PRYOR
    First Assistant Attorney General
    MARYKELLER
    Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    RENEAHIcK!s
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    MADBLEINE B. JOHNSON
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Rick Gilpin
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 725
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DM-140

Judges: Dan Morales

Filed Date: 7/2/1992

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017