Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1988 )


Menu:
  •                        September 16, 1988
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell               Opinion No.   JM-954
    Commissioner
    Texas Rehabilitation Commission    Re: Per diem for members
    118 E. Riverside Drive             of the Board of Texas Re-
    Austin, Texas 78704-9982           habilitation   Commission
    and its subordinate  com-
    ponents (RQ-1330)
    Dear Commissioner Arrell:
    you ask about the per diem to be paid to members of the
    Texas Rehabilitation Commission as well as the per diem to
    be paid to members     of several subordinate    or related
    committees, councils, and advisory boards.
    Article 6813f, V.T.C.S., is a general provision dealing
    with per diem for members of "state boards or commissions.11
    Article   6813f, which was originally    enacted   in  1981,
    provides:
    Sec. 1.   In this Act, "state board or
    commission11 means   a   board,   commission,
    committee, council, or other similar   agency
    in the executive or judicial branch of state
    government that is composed of two or more
    members.
    Sec. 2.   (a) A member of a state board or
    commission is entitled to per diem relating
    to the member's    service on the board or
    commission.   The amount of the per diem is
    the amount     prescribed   by   the   General
    Appropriations Act.
    (b) This section does not apply to a
    member of the legislature who serves on a
    board or commission by virtue of the member's
    position as a legislator.
    Sec. 3. Each law prescribing the amount
    of per diem relating to membership on a state
    board or commission    is suspended   to the
    p. 4829
    Mr.   Vernon   M. Arrell - Page 2    (JM-954)
    extent of a conflict with this Act. If the
    General Appropriations Act does not prescribe
    the amount of per diem to which a member of a
    state board or commission is entitled by law,
    the law prescribing the amount of per diem is
    not suspended by this Act. If a law imposes
    a limit on the number of days for which      a
    member of a state board or commission       is
    entitled to claim per diem, the limit is not
    suspended by this Act.
    See aener llv Attorney     General Opinions JR-888    (1988);
    JR-426 (19t6) ; JM-382, JR-349 (1985); MW-388 (1981).
    The current appropriations       act       sets out the   following
    per diem allowances:
    Sec. 4. PER DIEM OF BOARD OR COMMISSION
    MEMBERS.  a. As authorized by Section 2 of
    Article 6813f, Texas Revised Civil Statutes
    Annotated, the per diem of state board and
    commission members shall consist of  (1) com-
    pensatory per diem at $30 per day: (2) actual
    expenses for meals and lodging not to exceed
    $75 per day: and (3) transportation.
    b. If a law enacted after Article    6813f
    authorizes per diem for members of a particu-
    lar state board or commission, but does not
    specify the amount of the per diem, then the              .
    amount of the per diem shall be as listed  in
    the preceding paragraph.
    General Appropriations Act, Acts         1987, 70th Leg., 2d       C.S.,
    ch. 78, art. V § 4(a), at 820.
    you first ask how much members    of the board of the
    Rehabilitation Commission are entitled to receive for their
    expenses.   Section 111.015 of the Human Resources Code was
    amended in 1985 to provide as follows:
    (a) Board members   [of the Rehabilitation
    Commission] are entitled to reimbursement for
    actual and necessary expenses incurred in the
    discharge of their official duties and the
    compensatory  per diem ~-authorized by     the
    General Appropriations Act for each day at an
    official meeting as authorized by the board.
    (b) A member of the board who is disabled
    and who, because of the disability,  requires
    special aids or travel attendants is entitled
    p. 4830
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 3     (JM-954)
    to reimbursement for the cost of the       special
    aids or travel attendants.
    The prior version of section 111.015 provided:
    Board members   serve without  compensation
    but are entitled to reimbursement for actual
    and necessary    expenses   incurred  in   the
    discharge of their official duties.
    Act6 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 842, at 2421.
    The Rehabilitation Commission and the Comptroller agree
    that a statute passed after the enactment of article     6813f
    that sets per diem for a particular board prevails        over
    article 6813f. However,    the Rehabilitation Commission   and
    the Comptroller   disagree  about the   effect of the 1985
    amendments to section 111.015 of the Human Resources     Code.
    The Rehabilitation Commission   takes the position that the
    original version of section 111.015, which authorized actual
    expenses, was superseded by article 6813f, but that the 1985
    amendments reenacted the authorization for actual expenses
    and made section 111.015 a later enactment      than article
    6813f. The Comptroller argues that the 1985 amendments      do
    .-.   not make section 111.015 a later enactment than 6813f for
    purposes of determining the amount of expenses      to which
    board members   are entitled.    The Comptroller   bases his
    argument on the fact that the 1985 amendment left the words
    regarding actual expenses unchanged.
    The Board of Irrigators        raised essentially    the same
    argument in Attorney General Opinion JR-888 (1988). In that
    opinion we considered      a 1985 amendment       to the statute
    governing per diem for members       of the Board of Irrigators.
    That amendment    replaced    language allowing $25 a day in
    compensatory per diem with a reference            to the General
    Appropriations Act; but it retained the exact language           of
    the prior version regarding      actual expenses. We concluded
    that the 1985 amendment reenacted the authorization             for
    actual expenses because the statutory           reference   to the
    appropriations    act    eliminated    any    argument  that    the
    legislature   was     unaware    of    the    existence    of   the
    appropriations act and the conflict on the appropriations
    act provisions and the provisions of section 111.015.            We
    concluded, therefore, that the statute governing the Board
    of Irrigators prevailed over article 6813f. The reasoning
    of Attorney   General Opinion JR-888 applies to the 1985
    amendment to section 111.015 of the Human Resources           Code.
    Therefore, we conclude that the provision authorizing actual
    travel expenses    for board members       of the Rehabilitation
    Commission has been reenacted and that the board members are
    entitled to reimbursement for actual expenses.
    p. 4831
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 4    (m-954)
    you next ask whether members of the Consumer Advisory
    Committee of the Rehabilitation   Commission are entitled   to
    actual expenses.  The committee   is established pursuant   to
    section 111.016 of the Human Resources Code. Subsection (d)
    of section 111.016 provides   that the committee members   are
    entitled to reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses.
    Before 1985, section 111.016 permitted the Rehabilitation
    Commission to set up advisory committees.      In 1985 it was
    amended to require the Rehabilitation Commission to set up a
    consumer advisory  committee, and the commission's     general
    authority to set up advisory committees was deleted.      Acts
    1958, 69th Leg., ch. 603, at 2273.          Before the 1985
    amendment subsection (d) of section 111.016 provided:
    The members   of the advisory    committee
    serve without compensation  but are entitled
    to reimbursement  for actual and necessary
    expenses incurred in attending the official
    meetings of the advisory committee.
    Acts 1969, 61st Deg., ch. 40, 5 5(b), at 105; Acts 1971, 62d
    Leg., ch. 405, 5 54(2), at 1533. The 1985 amendment changed
    subsection (d) to read as follows:
    The members   of the consumer     advisory
    committee are entitled to compensatory     per
    diem authorized by the General Appropriations
    Act for each day engaged in the performance
    of their duties as directed by the board and
    to reimbursement  for actual and necessary
    expenses incurred in attending the official
    meetings of the consumer advisory committee.
    Again, for the reasons set out in Attorney General   Opinion
    JM-888, we conclude that the 1985 amendment reenacted    the
    provision regarding actual expenses and that the members  of
    the   Consumer   Advisory   Committee   are   entitled    to
    reimbursement for actual expenses.
    your third question     *   whether   members of    the
    Governor's Committee for Dis%ed    Persons are entitled   to
    receive reimbursement for actual expenses.   The Governor's
    Committee for Disabled Persons was reestablished      by an
    executive order issued on October 5, 1987. Executive   Order
    No. WPC 87-16    (1987).  The executive  order provides   in
    section 11-3:
    APWINTED   committee   members  shall   serve
    without pay, but shall be entitled to actual
    and necessary expenses  incurred in perform-
    ance of COMMITTEE business, such business  to
    include attendance   at Committee meetings,
    p. 4832
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 5   (JR-954)
    telephone calls to conduct Committee    busi-
    ness, and attendance at functions to offi-
    cially represent   the Committee,   but such
    expenses shall be limited to funds available.
    In Attorney General Opinion JM-382 (1985) we concluded   that
    the per diem provisions of article 6813f, V.T.C.S., apply to
    boards and committees established  by executive order.    The
    governor has no power to change existing law merely  by issu-
    ing a proclamation.     T.errell  Wells Swimmina    Pool   V.
    Rodriw     
    182 S.W.2d 824
    , 827 (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio
    1944, wri.4 ref'd).   Therefore, absent specific    statutory
    authority to do so, the governor may not set a per diem for
    a board or committee that conflicts with the general law set
    out in article 6813f. The members of the Governor's Commit-
    tee for Disabled Persons are therefore    entitled to reim-
    bursement for expenses subject to the limitations set out in
    the appropriations act.
    You next ask whether members of the State Independent
    Living Council are entitled to compensatory     per diem and
    reimbursement for expenses.   Federal law provides that each
    state receiving federal funds for the provision of independ-
    ent living services   for the disabled must set up a State
    Independent Living Council.    29 U.S.C. § 796d(a)(l).      See
    aenerallv 29 U.S.C. §§ 796-796i. The federal statute       sets
    out the qualifications for membership on the council        and
    provides that the state agency designated      under section
    796d(a)(l) is responsible for appointing the members of the
    council. We assume that the Rehabilitation Commission        is
    the agency designated in section 796d(a)(l). See Hum. Res.
    Code 65 111.051, 111.053; 40 T.A.C.' § 101.1; ch. 107    (inde-
    pendent living).    In Attorney General Opinion JM-382 we
    concluded that the provisions    of article 6813f apply to
    state committees created pursuant to agency authority.      The
    Independent Living Council is apparently such an agency.
    See aenerally Hum. Res. Code g 111.053 (commission may adopt
    methods of administration found necessary by federal govern-
    ment); 5 111.054 (Rehabilitation Commission may comply with
    any requirements necessary to obtain federal funds). Absent
    specific authority, however, an agency may not enact a rule
    allowing reimbursement for expenses in excess of the amount
    authorized by article 6813f and the appropriations act. See
    Attorney   General Opinion JM-457     (1986) (providing that
    agency rules may not conflict with statute).        Therefore,
    members ,of the Independent Living Council are entitled      to
    reimbursement for expenses as provided by the appropriations
    act. We also conclude that members        of the Independent
    Living Council are not entitled to compensatory per diem in
    .-   the absence of a specific statute authorizing     compensatory
    per diem. &S Attorney General Opinion JM-382 (1985).
    p. 4833
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 6        (JM-954)
    You also ask about per diem for members             of the
    Deaf-Blind Advisory   Committee,   which was created by the
    commission   pursuant  to   the commission's     authority    to
    establish   programs  to help deaf-blind       multihandicapped
    individuals.   Hum. Res. Code 5 113.001. Because there is no
    specific   statutory  authority    governing   the    committee,
    article 6813f is applicable.    Thus, the members are entitled
    to reimbursement   for travel expenses as provided       in the
    appropriations   act,   and   they are     not     entitled   to
    compensatory per diem.
    You also ask about per diem for members of the State-
    wide Steering Committee, which was established pursuant to a
    Senate Concurrent Resolution.     Acts 70th Leg., S.C.R.     135.
    It is composed of representatives of various agencies,        and
    its purpose is to report to the legislature.     The resolution
    is silent as to compensatory per diem and reimbursement       for
    expenses.     Because all the members of the committee        are
    apparently employees or volunteer     agents of specific    state
    agencies, we conclude that the committee is in the executive
    branch and that article    6813f is applicable.   See    V.T.C.S
    art. 6813f, 5 1. (per diem provisions of article 6813f not
    applicable to committees in the legislative branch).       There-
    fore, committee members    are~entitled   to reimbursement    for
    expenses in     accordance   with    the provisions     of    the
    appropriations   act,   and    they are     not   entitled     to
    compensatory per diem.
    Your final question. regards the Medical   Consultation
    Committee.  You provide the following information about the
    committee:
    The Medical Consultation Committee created by
    the Commission pursuant   to Section  111.052,
    Human Resources Code, V.T.C.A., the member-
    ship of which is appointed by the Commission-
    . This Committee is a group of medical
    Ezactitioners  that meet at various      times
    during the year to provide consultation     on
    medical matters to the Commission and as such
    are reimbursed in accordance with Art. 664.4,
    Professional Services   Procurement  Act, and
    the provisions of attachment G.
    We assume that the.committee was created either pursuant     to
    subsection (b)(6) of section 111.052 of the Human Resources
    Code, which permits the rehabilitation commission to "con-
    tract with   . . . doctors . . . for training,       physical
    restoration,   transportation,    and   other  rehabilitation      -
    services,"   or pursuant    to the more general    subsection
    (b)(3), which authorizes the Rehabilitation Commission      to
    contract with   individuals   as necessary  to implement   the
    p-     4834
    Mr.   Vernon M. Arrell - Page 7     (JM-954)
    provisions of Chapter   111 of the Human Resources      Code.
    Those provisions  and your reference   to the Professional
    Services Procurement Act suggest that the the physicians   in
    question have contracted with the Rehabilitation  Commission
    to provide professional services.  If so, they are entitled
    to payment in accordance with the terms of their contracts.
    SUMMARY
    Members   of   the board     of the    Texas
    Rehabilitation   Commission   are entitled   to
    reimbursement for actual expenses incurred in
    the discharge   of their duties. Members     of
    the Consumer Advisory       Committee  of   the
    Rehabilitation   Commission   are entitled   to
    reimbursement for actual expenses      incurred
    in attending official meetings.     Members  of
    the Governor's Committee for Disabled Persons
    are entitled to per diem for expenses subject
    to the limitations set out in the appropria-
    tions act. Members of the State Independent
    Living Council, members of the Deaf-Blind
    Advisory   Committee,  and    members  of   the
    Statewide Steering Committee are entitled    to
    per diem     for expenses     subject to    the
    limitations set out in the appropriations act
    and are not entitled to compensatory        per
    diem.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    MARYEELLBR
    First Assistant Attorney General
    LQU MCCREARY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAELEY
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Sarah Woelk
    C
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 4835
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-954

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1988

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017