Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1988 )


Menu:
  •              THE   ATTORNEY          GENERAL
    OF   TEXAS
    April 8, 1988
    Mr. L. L. Bowman III            Opinion No. JR-889
    Commissioner
    Texas Savings and Loan          Re: Authority of the Savings
    Department                   and Loan Department to obtain
    2601 N. Lamar, Suite 201        liability coverage   for its
    Austin, Texas 78705             officers and employees
    (RQ-1203)
    Dear Mr. Bowman:
    You  ask  several    questions pertaining  to article
    6252-19a, V.T.C.S., and the Texas Tort Claims Act     (Civ.
    Prac. & Rem. Code §lOl.OOl et sea.).       Several of your
    questions relate to the scope of the attorney general's
    review of liability    insurance policies and any monetary
    limits on such policies.
    Article 6252-19a, V.T.C.S., authorizes state agencies
    which own and operate motor vehicles,       aircraft,  and
    watercraft to insure their officers and employees     from
    liability arising out of the use of such vehicles       or
    equipment.  V.T.C.S.  art. 6252-19a,   51.   The attorney
    general's  responsibility  in regard to this liability
    insurance is set out in section 1 of article   6252-19a as
    follows:
    Sec.  1 . . . All liabilitv insurance   so
    purchased shall be provided on a policy form
    or forms annroved by the State Board of
    Insurance as to form and bv the Attorney
    General as to liability.   (Emphasis added.)
    You ask first whether there
    limit on the amount of liability i~:u``~c,"'``=e~=ge'````
    may be purchased   under this statute. Specifically,   YOU
    inquire about the applicability of the maximum liability
    C   limits set by the Texas Tort Claims Act. In Attorney
    General Opinion M-501    (1969), this office addressed the
    issue of limitations   on the amount of coverage that the
    Texas Highway    Department was authorized     to purchase
    p.   4351
    Mr. L.L. Sowman III - Page 2   (JM-889)
    pursuant to the   newly   enacted article   6252-19a.   That
    opinion stated:
    With reference to your second question   as
    to the amount of coverage that may       be
    purchased, H.B. 203  [article 6252-19a] has
    provided no guidelines in this area.    The
    proper amount of coverage has been left to
    the sound discretion   of the governmental
    agencies involved, and in the event of a
    court test it is our view that a reasonable
    exercise of that discretion would be left
    undisturbed.
    Attorney General Opinion M-501 (1969). Since the issuance
    of Attorney  General Opinion M-501, there has been no
    amendment to article   6252-19a establishing a statutory
    minimum or maximum coverage level. Therefore, we conclude
    that your department has the responsibility   to set the
    level of coverage for its employees.
    Confusion may have arisen about the applicability of
    the Texas Tort Claims  Act to article  6252-19a, V.T.C.S.,
    based on other language found in Attorney General Opinion
    M-501.  Following the language quoted above, the opinion
    read as follows:
    In this connection we would point out that
    the Texas     Tort Claims    Act . . . limits
    governmental liability to $lOO,OOO.OO     per
    person and $300,000.00      for any    single
    incident.   It is our view that an individual
    policy of insurance under [article 6252-19a]
    that did not exceed those limits would meet
    the test of reasonableness, provided that in
    the exercise of discretion      the   Highway
    Department finds tha~t such is reasonably
    necessary.
    We do not believe that the Texas Tort Claims Act controls
    the amount of coverage which an agency may ob~tain under
    article 6252-19a. The Texas Tort Claims Act establishes a
    limited waiver of sovereign immunity and prescribes    the
    maximum governmental liability  in certain circumstances.
    Article 6252-19a, on the other hand, allows certain state
    agencies to obtain liability insurance for employees under
    certain conditions.  The reference to the Tort Claims Act
    in the opinion quoted above was merely intended as a guide
    or example to assist state agencies in making reasonable
    p. 4352
    Mr. L.L. Bowman III - Page 3   (JR-889)
    determinations  of coverage.    To the extent that the
    opinion may have been interpreted as imposing the Texas
    Tort Claims liability  limitations onto article 6252-19a,
    Attorney General Opinion M-501 is modified.
    To summarize,   article 6252-19a, V.T.C.S., does not
    prescribe dollar   limits on insurance coverage purchased
    pursuant to that article.      The liability limits esta-
    blished in the Texas Tort Claims Act are not applicable to
    article 6252-19a.
    You next     ask  whether the    attorney    general's
    responsibility   to approve  insurance policies     "as to
    liability"   requires the attorney general     to   make a
    determination of the reasonableness    of the amount of
    liability coverage purchased by a state agency. We think
    not. The practice of the attorney general's office        in
    reviewing policies pursuant to article 6252-19a has been
    to determine whether a given state agency is authorized to
    purchase insurance under the statute and whether        the
    policy covers authorized persons and equipment.
    The attorney general's    policy of not attempting  to
    determine the reasonableness of particular coverage limits
    for a given agency is consistent with the earlier inter-
    pretation of the statute in Attorney       General Opinion
    M-501. The affected state agency, in the first instance,
    must exercise   its discretion   in determining whether  to
    purchase liability insurance and the amount of coverage it
    deems appropriate.   A court, in the second instance,    is
    the appropriate body to evaluate the reasonableness of the
    limits obtained by a state agency. Unlike the state agency
    or a court reviewing that agency's decisions, the attorney
    general is not in a position to find facts regarding the
    reasonableness of a particular amount of coverage.      The
    amount of coverage that is reasonable may vary from agency
    to agency and between individual departments    or sections
    within the same agency.
    You also ask whether the attorney general       will
    approve an insurance policy which provides, at no added
    cost to the state, additional coverage      that is not
    authorized by article 6252-19a. We understand that the
    State Board of Insurance has not prescribed a specific
    form for use by state agencies pursuant       to article
    6252-19a. Rather, a state agency must use one of the
    general forms for motor vehicle liability  insurance that
    has been approved by the board for general commercial use
    in the state. Consequently,    a state agency purchasing
    p. 4353
    Mr. L.L. Bowman 111 - Page 4   (JM-889)
    liability insurance under the statute may     incidentally
    receive other coverage.  Because no state funds are being
    expended for this other coverage, this office neither        -,
    approves nor disapproves this portion of the policy.
    Finally, you raise the possibility of your department
    purchasing liability insurance under the Texas Tort Claims
    Act and ask:    (1) whether the department would   receive
    additional protection by also purchasing insurance under
    article 6252-19a, V.T.C.S.;   and   (2) whether the State
    Board of Insurance and the attorney general must review a
    policy purchased by the department pursuant to the Texas
    Tort Claims Act.   Section 101.027 of the Civil Practice
    and Remedies  Code governs  liability insurance purchased
    under the Texas Tort Claims Act. It provides in part:
    (a) Each governmental unit may purchase
    insurance policies protecting the unit and
    the unit's employees against claims under
    this chapter.
    The Savings and Loan Department is a governmental unit as
    defined by the Texas Tort Claims Act, and is covered by
    section   101.027.   However, we note that the General
    Appropriations Bill for the current biennium contains the
    following provision:
    Sec. 54. TORT CLAIMS ACT. None of the
    funds appropriated   in this Act may      be
    expended  for the purpose of      purchasing
    policies  of   insurance   covering   claims
    arising under the Texas Tort Claims Act.
    General Appropriations Act, Acts 1987, 70th Leg., 2d C.S.,
    ch. 78, art. V, 554, at 1120. A similar restriction has
    been included    in previous  appropriation    bills.  See
    Attorney  General Opinion Nos. JM-625       (1987); JM-551
    (1986); H-900 (1976).
    It is our understanding    that there are no funds
    available to your department    that are not subject to
    the restriction of section 54, article V, of the General
    Appropriations Act. Therefore, we decline to address the
    first pa* of your question. Assuming a state agency has
    funds available for the purchase   of insurance under the    1
    Texas Tort Claims Act, we have found no provision   in the
    act which requires this office or the State Board of
    Insurance to approve the purchase.
    p. 4354
    Mr. L.L. Bowman III - Page 5     (JM-889)
    SUMMARY
    (1) Article 6252-19a, V.T.C.S., sets no
    maximum or minimum monetary coverage available
    to a state agency covered by the article.
    (2) The statutory limits of liability
    prescribed by the Texas Tort Claims Act do not
    apply to an insurance policy purchased by a
    state agency pursuant to article     6252-19a,
    V.T.C.S.
    (3) The attorney general does not review
    the amount of liability coverage purchased   by
    a state agency pursuant to article 6252-19a.
    (4) The current general appropriations
    act prohibits  the use of appropriated   funds
    for the purchase of insurance under the Texas
    Tort Claims Act. The attorney general does
    not have a statutory obligation     to review
    insurance purchased pursuant to the act.
    LL.JJJ
    Very truly yo
    .
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    MARY KELLER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    LOU MCCRFARY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, opinion Committee
    Prepared by Karen C. Gladney
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 4355
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-889

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1988

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017