Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1987 )


Menu:
  • Eonorable Frederick .I.Biel       Opinion No. J-M-736
    Bee County Attorney
    Bee County Courthouse             ue:   Whether article 64.036 of the
    Beeville, Texas   78102           Election Code is applicable to
    persons who assist voters under the
    provisions of section 86.010 of the
    Election Code
    Dear Mr. Biel:
    You ask whether the penal provisions of section 64.036 of the
    Election Code are applicable to persons who assist voters under the
    provisions of section 86.010 of the Election Code. You also ask
    whether section 64.036 of the Election Code is unconstitutionally
    vague in the context of absentee'voting by mail.
    Provisions relating to the general conduct of elections are found
    in title 6 of the Election Code [hereinafter the Code]. Chapter 64 of
    the Code addresses election day voting procedures at the polling
    place. Title 8 of the Code pertains to absenta voting. Chapter 86
    regulates the conduct of absentee voting by mail.
    Your inquiry concerns procedures and penalties for assisting
    a voter in marking an absentee mail ballot. It is first necessary to
    review the provisions relating to assistance provided at the polling
    place, since those provisions also govern absentee voting by mail.
    A voter who is unable to prepare his ballot because of a physical
    disability or because of an inability to read the ballot is eligible
    for assistance. Sec. 64.031.' Assistance may be rendered by two
    election officers or by a person of the voter's choice. A voter may
    1. In addition to the "regular" absentee voting by mail proce-
    dures discussed in chapter 86 of the Code, chapters 101-114 cover
    special forms of absentee voting. These chapters are not relevant to
    the questions posed in this opinion and are excluded from discussion.
    2. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the
    Election Code.
    p. 3425
    Honorable Frederick J. Biel - Page 2    (J-M-736)
    not select his employer, an agent of his employer, or an officer or
    agent of a labor union to which the voter belongs to assist him. Sec.
    64.032.
    A person assisting a voter reads the entire ballot to the voter
    unless the voter indicates a desire to vote only on certain offices or
    measures. Sec. 64.033. If a voter is assisted by a person other than
    an election officer, the person must take the following oath adminis-
    tered by an election officer:
    I swear (or affirm) that I will not suggest, by
    word, sign, or gesture, how the voter should vote;
    I will confine my assistance to answering the
    voter's questions, to stating propositions on the
    ballot, and to naming candidates and, if listed,
    their political parties; and I will prepare the
    voter's ballot as the voter directs.
    Sec. 64.034.
    If assistance is provided to a voter who is not eligible to
    receive assistance, the voter's ballot is not to be counted. Sec.
    64.037.   Section 64.036 defines offenses and prescribes criminal
    penalties for unlawfully assisting e voter. Section 64.036 provides:
    (a) A person commits an offense if the person
    knowingly:
    (1) provides assistance to a voter who is
    not eligible for assistance;
    (2)  while assisting a voter prepares the
    voter's ballot in a way other than the way the
    voter directs; or
    while assisting a voter suggests by
    word,(3jign, or gesture how the voter should
    vote.
    (b) A person commits an offense if the person
    knowingly assists a voter in violation of Section
    64.032(c).
    (c) An election officer commits an offense if
    the officer knowingly permits a person to provide
    assistance:
    (1) to a voter who is not eligible for
    assistance; or
    p. 3426
    Honorable Frederick J. Biel - Page 3    (JM-736)
    (2)   in violation of Section 64.032(c).
    (d) An offense under this section is a Class B
    misdemeanor.
    The provisions regarding assistance in mail balloting situations
    are found in sections 86.010, 86.012, and 86.013 of the Code. Section
    86.010 provides:
    (a) A voter casting a ballot by mail who would
    be eligible under Section 64.031 to receive
    assistance at a polling place may select a person
    as provided by Section 64.032(c) to assist the
    voter in preparing the ballot.
    (b) Assistance rendered under this section
    is limited to that authorized by this code at a
    polling place.
    (c) If a voter is assisted in violation of
    this section, the voter's 'ballot may not be
    counted. (Emphasis added).
    The instructions required to be printed on an official ballot
    envelope in which a voter's marked ballot is to be placed are
    prescribed by section 86.012.     Subsection (b) of that section
    provides:
    (b) The following textual material, as pre-
    scribed by the secretary of state, must be printed
    on the face of each official ballot envelope and
    may be continued on the reverse side if necessary:
    (1) instructions for marking the ballot
    and returning the marked ballot to the absentee
    voting clerk;
    (2) the deadline for returning the marked
    ballot to the clerk;
    (3) limitations      on   assistance    to   the
    voter; and
    (4) criminal   penalties   for          unlawful
    assistance in preparing the ballot.         (Emphasis
    added).
    Pertinent information required to be printed on the official
    carrier envelope in which the voter's absentee ballot is returned to
    p. 3427
    Honorable Frederick J. Biel - Page 4   (JM-736)
    the absentee voting clerk is set forth in section 86.013(c).      The
    subsection reads:
    (4   A certificate in       substantially the
    following form must be printed on the reverse side
    of the official carrier envelope:
    'I certify that the enclosed ballot expresses
    my wishes independent of any dictation or undue
    persuasion by any person.
    Signature of voter
    By:
    Signature of person assisting
    voier',if applicable (see Ballot
    Envelope for restrictions and
    penalties)
    Printed name of person assisting
    voter, if applicable
    Residence   address of    person
    assisting voter, if applicable'
    You question the applicability of the penalties for unlawful
    assistance set forth in section 64.036 (election day assistance) to
    assistance rendered pursuant to section 86.010 (absentee by mail
    assistance). Section 86.010 authorizes assistance in absentee voting
    by mail and limits the assistance to that authorized at a polling
    place. Sec. 86.010, subsecs. (a). (b). Subsection 86.010(c) prohibits
    the counting of a ballot when a voter is assisted in violation of
    section 86.010. Thus, the assistance available to a person voting by
    mail is equivalent to that offered a voter at the polling place. The
    limitations and penalties concerning assistance are printed on the
    official ballot envelope and noted on the official carrier envelope to
    instruct a voter and a person who may be assisting a voter on the
    proper method of assistance.
    Despite these requirements. you suggest that the legislature did
    not intend to impose criminal penalties on unlawful assistance in
    absentee voting. You rely on a general provision pertaining to the
    epplicability of other portions of the Code to absentee voting.
    Section 81.002 of the Code provides:
    The other titles of this code apply to absentee
    voting except provisions that are inconsistent
    with this title or that cannot feasibly be applied
    to absentee voting.
    p. 3428
    Honorable Frederick J. Biel - Page 5   (JR-736)
    By the terms of section 81.002, the offenses created in section
    64.036 do apply to absentee voting by mail. unless the offenses are
    inconsistent or infeasible in that context. Rowever, you do not
    suggest that section 64.036 is inconsistent with the absentee proce-
    dures or that the penalties cannot feasibly be applied. Rather, you
    urge that in light of section 81.002. either: (1) section 86.010 is
    redundant. or (2) that the provisions repeated in section 86.010 are
    an exhaustive listing of the assistance provisions that apply to
    absentee by mail situations. Specifically, you cite the inclusion of
    language similar to section 64.037 (ballot void when assistance
    rendered to ineligible voter) in section 86.010 and the failure to
    repeat the criminal penalty section as evidence of legislative intent
    to limit available sanctions in absentee voting.
    We cannot agree with this reading of the Code. We believe that a
    more reasonable reading of section 81.002 in conjunction with sections
    86.010, 86.012, and 86.013 discloses a legislative intent to ensure
    the availability of assistance in mail voting and to preclude any
    suggestion that such assistance is inconsistent or infeasible.
    While section 81.002 renders repetition of compatible provisions
    unnecessary, it does not eliminate all questions of applicability. We
    do not consider section 86.010 redundant because explicit authorisa-
    tion of assistance eliminates any dispute about its applicability to
    wail absentee procedures.
    We note that several provisions relating to election day assis-
    tance cannot feasibly be applied to absentee voting by mail. For
    example, the oath requirement in section 64.034 assumes the presence
    of an election officer; the deposit of the marked ballot in section
    64.035 assumes the presence of a ballot box; and the offense created
    in section 64.036(c) assumes the presence of an election officer.
    Incidentally, each of these provisions is consistent with and may
    feasibly be applied to absentee voting by personal appearance.
    We cannot conclude that the partial restatement of assistance
    provisions in the chapter on absentee voting by mail is intended to
    be exhaustive. Such a conclusion would render sections 81.002,
    86.012(b), and 86.013(c) inoperative. It is a well-settled rule of
    statutory construction that language is to be construed in a wanner
    that gives effect and meaning to each word, sentence, end clause of
    the statute if feasible. As we stated in Attorney General Opinions
    JM-106 (1983) and JR-221 (1984). statutory language should not be
    construed in a fashion that renders some lannuane redundant or
    inoperative. See Perkins v. State, 
    367 S.W.2d 146
    . 146 (Tex. 1963);
    Eddins-Walcherxtane    Company v. Calvert, 
    298 S.W.2d 93
    , 96 (Tex.
    1957); Spence v. Penchler, 
    180 S.W. 597
    , 601 (Tex. 1915).
    p. 3429
    Honorable Frederick J. Biel - Page 6 (JM-736)
    In our opinion, section 64.036. subsections (a), (b). and (d) of
    the Code are consistent with and applicable to assistance rendered to
    a voter pursuant to section 86.010 of the Code.
    You also ask whether section 64.036 is unconstitutionally vague.
    Article I, section 10, of the Texas Constitution states, in part:
    In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall
    have a speedy trial by an impartial jury. !i=
    shall have the right to demand the nature and
    cause of the accusation against him. and to have a
    copy thereof. . . . (Emphasis added).
    The requirement for clarity in penal statutes is restated in the
    Penal Code. Section 1.02 of the Penal Code provides, in part:
    The general purposes of this code are to
    establish a system of prohibitions. penalties, and
    correctional measures to deal with conduct, that
    unjustifiably and inexcusably causes or threatens
    harm to those individual or public interests for
    which state protection is appropriate. To this
    end, the provisions of this code are intended, and
    shall be construed, to achieve the following
    objectives:
    .   .   .   .
    (2) by definition and grading of offenses to
    give fair warning of what is prohibited and of the
    consequences of violation. . . . (Emphasis added).
    This "fair warning" requirement applies to offenses defined by laws
    outside the Penal Code also. -
    See Penal Code 11.03(b).
    You do not suggest particular words within section 64.036 that
    are lacking in clarity. The applicable standard for determining
    vagueness was stated in Attorney General Opinion H-925 (1977). at 1.
    "A law is void for vagueness if it fails to give a person of ordinary
    intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know whet is prohibited."
    Grayned v. City of Eockford, 
    408 U.S. 104
    (1972); Ex parte Frye, 
    156 S.W.2d 531
    (Tex. Grim. App. 1941).
    In deciding whether the provisions sanctioning unlawful assis-
    tance are clear, we look first to the provisions pertaining to
    assistance. Courts have had no trouble determining whether specific
    behavior constitutes assistance. Carter v. White, 
    161 S.W.2d 525
    (Tex. Civ. App. - El Paso 1942, no writ); Fuentes v. Eoward, 
    423 S.W.2d 420
    (Tex. Civ. App. - El Paso 1967. writ dism'd). The statutes
    at issue in those election contests were election laws from which the
    p. 3430
    c
    Honorable Frederick J. Biel - Page 7    (JM-736)
    *
    current assistance provisions are derived.       While neither case
    concerned the constitutionality of the penal provisions relating to
    illegal assistance, both courts agreed that "assistance" means aid in
    the actual marking of a voter's ballot. 
    Carter, 161 S.W.2d at 526
    ;
    
    Fuentes. 423 S.W.2d at 424
    .
    In our opinion, the language of sections 64.031, 64.032, and
    64.033 precisely define assistance, eligibility for assistance, and
    the method of providing assistance. Further, it is our opinion that
    section 64.036 clearly states the impermissible conduct and the
    sanctions for providing assistance contrary to law. Section 64.036 is
    not void for vagueness.
    SUMMARY
    Election Code section 64.036, subsections (a),
    (b), and (d) are consistent with and applicable to
    assistance rendered to a voter pursuant to section
    86.010 of the Election Code.        Election Code
    section 64.036 is not void for vagueness.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    MARY KELLER
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    JIJBGEXOLLIE STFAKLEY
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Karen Gladney
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 3431
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-736

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1987

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017