Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  • .   *     .
    The Attorney                 General         of Texas
    July   15, 1985
    JIM MAllOX
    Attorney General
    ~U~WTW tiurt building            Bonorablc  Jesusa Sanchez-Vera                        Opinion    Ho.    m-333
    P. 0. &lx 12546                  Jim Wells County bttorney
    *urtin. TX. 76711- 2546          P. 0. Drawer 2080                                     Re:   Whether a municipal   judge
    51214752501                      Alice,  Texas    78333                                may simultaneously     acme     as
    Telex QlW0711367
    T&,copirr 5121475~266
    county auditor
    Dear Ms. Sanchez-Vera:
    714 JackSOn. SUltE 700
    D4llar. TX. 75202.4506
    You ask vhcther     the municipal    judge of the city     of Allce   may
    2141742.6944
    continue. to sent!   as judge after he has been appointed       county auditor
    for Jim Wells County.       You inform us that the individual      in question
    4624 Alb.rla AS-.. SUit4 166     vrote   to the city council    stating  that he vould  continue    to se~e    as
    EI PISO. TX. 799052793           municipal   judge lut would forego the salary attached      to that position.
    OlY53sY64
    Article      XVI, section     40 of the Texas Constitution                prevents    one
    looI Texas. SUIIS 700
    person     from holtling      two civil      offices     of emolument.          The office     of
    Houston. TX. 77002.311~      county      auditor     and of municipal          judge     are both      civil     offices    of
    71312235886                  emolument.         See Purcell v. Carrillo,          349 S.W.Zd 263 (Tex. Civ. App. -
    San Antonio mi;            no writ);     Attorney     General Opinions         V-1541 (1952);
    O-2684 (1940); 2:~ also State v. Brinkerhoff.                     
    17 S.W. 109
    (Tex. 1886).
    606 Broadway. Suite 312
    Lubbock. TX. 79401.3479
    When a civil         of E:Lcer of emolument accepts            and qualifies       for another
    606rl47.5236                 civil    office      of emolument.       he is deemid to ha;e vacated                 the first
    office.        State -\I. Brinkerhof f , B.                  Centeno    v. Inselmann,         
    519 S.W.2d 889
    (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio                      1975, no writ).           Thus, by
    4309 N. fenlh. Suit0 S
    accepting       and qualifying        for    the    offlce      of   county     auditor,     the
    McAllen. TX. 76501*1665
    5W662.4547                    individual       in question     effectively       resigned      his  office     as municipal
    judge.
    200 Main Plaza. sui1e 400           His attempt      to refuse       the compensation        of the municipal         judge
    San Antonio. TX. 762052797
    does not enable him to continue             to hold the office.          The compensation
    5121225.4191
    attached   to a judge’s       office     is an incident       to his title       to office.
    Markwell v. Galveston           County.      
    186 S.W.2d 273
    (Tex. Civ.                App. -
    Galveston    1945, &It     ref’d).       A public   officer or employee cannot make
    a valid   agreement to accept less compensation               than the amount fixed by
    law.    McGuire v. City of Dallas.            170 S.W.Zd 722 (Tex. 1943); Horriso;
    v. City of Port-Worth.
    --         
    155 S.W.2d 908
    (Tex. 1941).              But see V.T.C.S.
    art.    3912m.     1311  cannot      estop    himself     from    collecting       the     full
    compensation     by agreeing       to accept less       or actually       accepting      less,
    Id.;   Broom v. Qler       County Commissioners Court,             
    560 S.W.2d 435
    (Tex,
    Civ. App. - Beaumont 1977, no writ).                  This rule applies        to officer1
    vhose compeasatf,Dn is fixed by statute              and those whose compensation             LI
    p. 1520
    Rooorable    Jesusr   Sancber-Vera     - Pago 2        (m-333)
    .
    fixed     by a governmental  bo’iy pursuant            to statutory      authority.    see,
    w,        Morrison v. City of l>rt Worth,             mr         (firemen’s   compensation
    estsblished      by state mlnimw wage provision);     Broom v. Tyler County
    Comissioners       Court, -,      (J.P.‘s   salary  fixed by commissioners
    court pursuant to article      3’912k, V.T.C.S.);  Pannin County v. Dobbs,
    
    202 S.W.2d 950
    (Ten. Cir. App, - Texerkana          1947, no writ)    (county
    clerk’s    salary fixed by cosdssioners    court pursuant to articles   3883,
    3891, 3899, 3912e. V.T.C.S.:,,,
    The governing body of ‘the city sets                 the municipal judge’s salary.
    V.T.C.S. art. 1010; ---see alno V.T.C.S.                    art. 1199a (compensation   of
    substitute   judge).    The municipal   judge has no power to waive that
    salary.    He holds an office  of emolument whether or not he accepts the
    compensation   attached  to the office.
    SUMMARY
    A municipal       ;\udge holds    a civil      office    of
    emolument even though he refuses            to accept       the
    compensation     attsched    to his office.     Article    XVI.
    section   40 of the Texas Constitution           prohibits     a
    municipal    judge who qualifies       for the position       of
    county    auditor       :from continuing      to    serve     as
    municipal    judge.
    Attorney     General    of Texas
    TOMGRBRN
    First Assistant      Attorney      G~%neral
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney           General
    ROBERTGRAY
    Special Assistant       Attorney     General
    RICX GILPIR
    Chairman, Oplnlon       Committee
    Prepared     by Susan L. Garrison
    Assistant     Attorney General
    p.   1521
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-333

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017