-
The Attomy General of Texas June 11, 1985 JIM MATTOX Attorney General suprems Ccucl MIdIn Eonorabla William L. yerguaon Opinion lo. m-332 P.0. Box 12540 County 6 District Attorney Austin. TX. 79711.2545 Rusk County Courthouse Rc: Circumstances under which a 512/47,2591 Benderson. Texas 75652 county my dispose of abandoned Telex 01011M4-l357 TelecQQler51214754m35 rights-of-way Dear Hr. Perguaon: 714 Jackam, sun0 790 oanu. TX. 752024505 You Inform ‘3s that in Rusk County several roads have been 214n42.9944 abandoned by actico of the cmlssionera court. The county clerk does not have any records as to hou the rights-of-way for these roads were 4024Albna K+c..Suite 180 acquired or est&lished by the county, but these roads were El Pmo, lx. 789052792 established many gears ago. In that regard you ask: 915icG34m Euv can the commissioners court of a count? lcol Texas. sune 700 dispose of abandoned rights;ofray when there is nwrtm. TX. 77002~3111 90 recotij shoving the method of acquisition of 71Y22%5855 such ri@ts-of-way? A county comadssioners court has only the pavers conferred either SW Broadway.SuNe 312 expressly or by at:cessary implication by the constitutfon and statutes Lubbock,TX. 79401-3479 mY747.5239 of this state. SW Tex. Const. --. art. V, 118; Canales v. Laughlin,
214 S.W.2d 451, 453 ‘[Tex. 1948). ThUS, the cormnissioners court can dispose of abanilctned right-of-way property only where there Is 4399 H. Tenth. Sulle S statutory or cons!:itutional authorization to do so.
Id. - McAllen,TX 79501-1885 512sS24547 Article 1577, V.T.C.S., prwides a statutory procedure authorizing a county commlssionera court to dispose of real estate. 200 MaIn Pbza, Suile 400 County roads and l:j.ghts-ofliay are iuterests in land. See Anderson v. !jan Antonio, TX. 702052797 Tall Timbers Cock,
378 S.W.2d 16(Tex. 1964). The statute 512i225-4181 soecif%callv authorizes a commissioners court to dispose of abandoned “highway right-of -‘ray property.” V.T.C.S. art. 15j7. It has been All EqualOPpcrtunilYl held that a conve!frmee or disposition of land owned by the county made Alflrmallve Action EmPlOYer in any mode other ,than prescribed by article 1577. V.T.C.S., is void. See Wilson v. Colzizof Calhoun,
489 S.W.2d 393(Tex. Civ. App. - Corpus Christi 1972. writ ref’d n.r.e.). Moreover, a cosmisaioners court has not been given the authority to douate any county-owned property to private indivjduals or corporations. See Conley v. Daughtera of the :%I!ublic. 156 S.U. 197 (Tex. 1913); Attorney General Oplnioa M-62 (1979 . -+-X100. owners of lands surrounding a road or right-of-way cannot claim title to them by adverse possession unless the road has been abandoned in compliance with section 2.008 of p. 1518 Eonorable Uilliu L. Terguaao - Page 2 (JX-332) article 6702-l. V.T.C.8. Cf. V.T.C.8. art. 5517; Attorney General Opinion B-111 (1973) (di&;~ing predecessor statute V.T.C.S. art. 6703a). . You indicated that thlcre are no records shoving the method of acquisition of the nou abandoned right-of-way property. The schama outlined in article 157i. V.T.C.S., makes provlslons for the disposition of right-of-va:r property even if there are no official records of how the property was acquired. The prerequisite for the application of article 1577, V.T.C.S., is that the property is owned by the county at the time of its disposition. Accordingly, the cqxmissioners court may dispose of the abandoned roads or rights-of-way only in the method outlined in article 1577, V.T.C.S. SUMMARY Once a county bomanissioners court has abandoned a road or right-of-way in compliance with article 6702-l. section :!.008, V.T.C.S., the court is authorized to ili.spose of the roads only in compliance with article 1577, V.T.C.S., regardless of the method of acquisition. JIM IIATTOX Attorney General of Texas TOMGREEN First Assistant Attorney Goneral DAVID R. RICEAFDS Executive Assistant Attormy General ROBERTGRAY Special Assistant Attorney General RICR GILPIR Chairman, Opinion Committe~c Prepared by Tony Guillory Assistant Attorney General p. 1519 -* . jt FZ- . - &morable William L. Perguam - Page 3 W-332) :, APPROVRD: OPINIONCCMITPBE Rick Gilpin, Chairman Colin Carl Susan Garrison Tony Guillory Jim Moellinger Jeunifer Riggs Nancy Sutton Sarah Woelk p. 1520
Document Info
Docket Number: JM-332
Judges: Jim Mattox
Filed Date: 7/2/1985
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017