Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  •                                   The Attorney        General of Texas
    JIM MATTOX                                       Iecember 30, 1985
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court Building           Honorable Lloyd Cr,iss              Opinion No. JM-411
    P. 0. BOX 12548                  chairmen
    Aus!in. TX. 78711. 2548          Committee on Labor,and              Re: Whether a neighboring state is
    5121475.2501                        Employment Rela.tions            prohibited from withholding state
    Telex 9101874.13S7
    Telecopier   5121475.0266
    Texas House of Representatives      income tax payments from the salary
    P. 0. Box 2910                      of an employee who is a permanent
    Austin, Texas   7f769               resident of Texas but who works
    714 Jackson, Suite 700                                               partially or temporarily in the
    Dallas, TX. 75202.4506
    neighboring state
    214l742.8944
    Dear Representatiw Criss:
    4824 Alberta   Ave., Suite 160
    El Paso, TX. 79905.2793               You have    submitted the following request regarding the
    915/533-3464                     withholding of state income tax from,the pay of certain railroad
    employees who are Texas residents:
    1001 Texas. Suite 700
    Houston, TX. 77002~3111                      Individuals living in Texas and working for
    713/2235&W                                railroad,8 are often required to travel through
    several states in the course of their daily
    employmsnt. Some of these states, notably the
    906 Broadway, Suite 312
    Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479
    neighboring states of Oklahoma and New Mexico,
    8061747.5238                              require the railroad to withhold state income
    taxes from the pay of these workers, despite the
    fact t'iat these individuals maintain their
    43G3 N. Tenth, Suite S
    permaner,tresidence in Texas.
    McAllen, TX. 78501-1685
    512M2.4547
    This practice seems to be inherently unfair. I
    would s,ppreciate your offering an opinion on
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400                 whether any laws of this state or of the United
    San Antonio, TX. 78205.2797
    States prevent this practice of withholding state
    512m54191
    income tax from the pay of an employee whose
    permanert residence is sot in that state, but who
    An Equal Opportunity/                     is mere1.yworking for some period of time in the
    Affirmative Action EmplOYer               state ir.the course of his/her employment.
    We are compelled to conclude that the railroad carriers in question
    are required to wl.thholdsuch taxes from the pay of certain workers.
    49 U.S.C., sc.ction11504, provides, in part, as follows:
    p. 1881
    Honorable Lloyd Criss - Pa(:e2   (JM-411)
    (a)(l) In this subsection, an employee is deemed
    to have earned nor+ than 50 percent of pay in a
    State or subdivilij.on
    of a State if the employee --
    (A) performs regularly assigned duties on a.
    locomotive, CIU:or other track-borne vehicle in
    at least 2 St:atesand the mileage traveled in
    one State or subdivision of that State is more
    than 50 percent of the total mileage traveled
    by the employee while employed during the
    calendar year;
    .   .   .   .
    (2) A rail, express, or sleeping car carrier
    providing    transportation   subject          the
    jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce C~ission
    under subchapter I of chapter 105 of this title
    [49 USCS 1510501 et seq.] shall withhold from the
    pay of an employee referred to in paragraph (1) of
    this subsection                             

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-411

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017