Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                            The Attorney              General of Texas
    AATrOX                                       December 13,     1984
    ,
    ,mey Qenerrl
    Ronorablc Hike Driscoll                            opinion    no.   311-247
    Rarria County Attorne]r
    1001 Preston,  Sulto   634                         UC:
    .-    Whether
    .-    rcspoaaibility     for
    --___
    Rouaton. Texaa     77ln.u                          the Ratrio County Child Support
    Division     may be      tranaferred
    from the Juvenile      Board to the
    Domestic Relations      Office
    Dear Mr. Driscoll:
    You inform         us    that    the Earris     County     Juvenile    Probation
    ’ 41bwl* AW.. eune lso   Department      has ‘cstabllshed        s Child   Support    Division.     It Is our
    w.lx. 7ow&2703         understanding      that tho Rarris County Juvenile         Board has dealgnated      the
    chief  ,juvenile     probation    officer  to receive    child support    payments in
    Harris County pursuant          to section   10(a) of article     5139W, V.T.C.S.
    t*xrs, SUllO no
    mton. lx. 77002-3111            In that   kegard.   you ask:
    r223sem
    1. Is the Child Support Dlviaion,              ss it la nov
    attached     to the Rarris      County Juvenile        Probation
    Department      II ‘child     support    collection       service
    specifically      established      by statute’      [within     the
    meaning      of section       7(a)    of   article      S142a-1.
    V.T.C.S.]?
    JO N. Tenth, SuIta I)
    .dm.lx 78m.16%
    'W4S4?                                   2. You’ll the collissioners         court be allowed to
    transfer   -‘r~t:~ponsibllity     for   the   Child   Support
    Division   .from the Juvenile        Board to the Domestic
    4ah-lPlua. tmt* 400                  Relations    Office   [established     pursuant    to article
    &ntonlo.lx ?32052?0?                 2338-le.  ‘V.rX.S.]?
    212254101
    The Harris       County    Coamisaioners     Court    has only the powers
    conferred     either     expressly      or by necessary        implication      ‘by  the
    constitution     and statutea     of thia atate.     See Tex. Conat. art. 0. 518;
    Cannales’v.%aughlio,         214 S.Y.2d 4S1, 4537%.           1948).     We begin with
    a the *orking lssumptloo         that the tollaction      of child support payments
    ln Rarris County uy arguably be governed by articlea                 5139W, 5142a-1,
    and/or 2338-le.      V.T.CI.S.     We vi11 analyze    there statutes      to determine
    vhich:ones     actually    e,overn this     matter.    Thus, the ansvera         to your
    questions    will    depeo,d upon which of these          statutes     authorizes    the
    collection    of child rupport payments In Rerris County.
    p. 1105
    .
    . .
    Honorable    Hike Driacoll            - Page 3     (m-247)
    See.   2.   (a)    A domestic     relations  office
    established    under Ssclios    1 of this article may be
    lda inia ter    byed the Jwrenile bosrd of a county or
    ulticounty     srea or athsnise      as provided  by the
    comissioners            court.
    (b)  Any domestic    wlatlons     office     currently     in
    existence   by statute      or trsdition       and vhich      has
    been under     the    conrrol    of and governed            by a
    juvenile    board    by Matute       or     tradition       shall
    continue   to operate under the current            admialstra-
    tion as established      b:r such statute      or tradltion.
    .   .   .    .
    Sec. 7.     (a)  This article    does not apply to a
    county in which achir5        support collection  service
    is epeciflcally     estabzlshed   by statute.
    (b)         This     arti&!        is cumulaiive      of    other
    statutes           relsting      to juvenile    boirds     and   child
    support          collection      offices.
    (c)    Another statut:e relating        to funds for the
    operation     of a child support office        and providing
    for an additional          :!S.ling fee    in excess       of $5
    prevails     over this      Act to the extent         that    the
    other      ststute      collflicts     with     the      UXbN
    edditional       filing     fee provided      by    this     Act.
    @@hasis       added).
    
    Id. This statute
         excepts      frnr its application            those     counties      “in
    Which a child         support     collect:ltm     service     is speclficelly         established
    by statute.       . . .” V.T.C.S.          art. 5142a-1.       17(a).     As indicated       above,
    the legislature          has establishal        the Juvenile        Board of Harris          County
    with the duty to “direct               vhel:her . . . the chief            juvenile      probation
    officer      shall       receive      paymwtr       for     the    support      of wives          and
    children.     . . .”        See V.T.C.S,       art.    5139W.      55(f).      Accordingly,         In
    response.. to your.. firbt          question , YC conclude           that the Child Support
    Divlalon’;     of      the     Rarria       County     Juvenile        Probation       Department
    lstabliahed,pursuant            to lrticl.e! 5139W. V.T.C.S..             is a “child       aupport
    collection       service     : . . spec~lfieally         astabliahed       by atatute”       vithin
    the meaning of mection 7(a) af article                     3142a-1,     V.T.C.S.       The Rarria
    Coucty Cocmissioners            Court may latablfah            s child      support     collection
    service    only pursuant         to article     5139W. V.T.C.S.’
    In regard to your second question , the general   rule                       ia    that vhen
    the legislsturs    impoaee upon an officer    or govermental                            board the
    performance     of certain acts  as part    of   an official                            duty,  the
    p. 1107
    Honorable    Iiike Driscoll       - Page 2            (247)
    The Harris County Juvenile         I?robation     Department vas lstabliehed
    in 1965 slong vith          the Harris     County Juvenile        Board by the Texaa
    Legislature.        See V.T.C.S.    art.    5139W,      111, 11.       Section    10(a)   of
    article     5139Wzs       amended in 10’15. provides          that the Juvenile        Board
    has the pover -- independently           of! the comlssioners          court   and at its
    option     -- to direct     the chief    juvenile     probation     officer    to receive
    child    support payments.      The only other person the Juvenile               Board may
    authorize      under the act to rweive              child    support     payment    is   the
    dlatrict     clerk.    See
    -   V.T.C.S.   art.    5139W.      610(b).
    Section     1 of article       2338-1s.         V.T.C.S.,   provides:
    Section      1. In counties           having a population              in
    excess     of       2.000,000,        aa     shown       by     the     last
    preceding         United       States       Census,         the      count
    commissioners           court -pay           create         a     domestiz
    relations      office     to pwvide         services       to eetablish
    and enforce court orders providing                     for the support
    and/or visitation           right,s to a child,            to establish
    paternity        or legitimation            of a child,             aod to
    provide     informational          services       to assist         parties
    affected       by a cour’i            order      la     understanding,
    complying        vith,     and enforcing             the      duties      and
    obligations        in the court order pertaining                  to child
    support      and rights          of visitation.                Upon such
    creation,       said    designated        county      office      shall    be
    directly      responsible        to the commissioners                court.
    The chief admlnistratA,ve              officer      of the designated
    county office          so created       shell     be appointed          by a
    majority      vote of the comissioners                    court of the
    county.       (Emphasis adclad).
    Harris     County falla       within     the: 2.000,OOO population           bracket    of the
    statute.       He conclude     that    the   dominant     purpose   of  article     2338-le    is
    to authorize        the Earrls       Count:j Coomissioners          Court to establish           a
    Domestic     Relations     Office     to act: as a legal         sgency to provide         those
    legal    servicas     necessary     to assist     those persone having s legal             right
    to child      support snd/or vlsital:l.on          privileges.       The statute      does not
    authorize      the comissioners           cod’rt to establish        a Domestic Relations
    Office      to function        as     a collection         service     to    receive     and/or
    distribute      child support paymews.
    A county co~isaloners               court         io also authorized         to establish     a
    Domestic Relations  Office            pursu,uit         to article S142a-1,        V.T.C.S.,   which
    providea:
    Section 1. The comnis~ioners      court of a county
    may establish a domestic  relstions     office  vith the
    p&err and duties  as provided     in this article.
    .
    p.     1106
    .
    Honorable     Mike Drieeoll        - Page 4      (JR-247)
    colaissioners       Court 1s vithout          authority       to trsnsfer       the performance
    of that official          dutv to any ot’hdr person or body thao that named in
    the law.       See Aldrich v. Dalias         C,ti,       167 S.W.Zd 560 (Tex. Civ. App.
    - Dallas      1922, vrit       dlrr``‘arro             County      v. Tullos,       
    237 S.W. 982
        (Tex. Civ.        APP. - Dallas        1921: vrit        ref’d).        You ask whether            ths
    Rarris      County       C~issioners         ‘Court       is     bthorized          to     transfer
    responsibility         for the Child        Sllpport Division          of the Harris          County
    Probation      Department       vhich   was created          pursuant      to article        3139W,
    V.T.C.S.,       to the Domestic Relations              Office      established        pursuant      to
    article       2338-18.       V.T.C.S.       As    previously         stated,       the     Domeatic
    Relations      Office,      which is directly        responsible        to the commissioners
    court.    has the duty of providing                those     legal    services      necessary        to
    ensure a party’s          right to child :support and/or visitation                    privileges.
    On the contrary.            the Child      Support     Division       of the Harris           County
    Probation      Departmeot       is administered       by the chief          juvenile      probation
    officer.      but it     is responsible        to the Harris County Juvenile                  Board.
    See Harris       County v. Schoenbschew,            594 S.W.Zd 106 (Tex. Clv. App. -
    Rouston [let Dirt.]           1979, writ re:f’d n.r.e.).
    Accordingly,     the   Barris     (County Comissioners    Court    is not
    authorized    to ignore the duties      imposed on the Aarris County Juvenile
    Board to provide     a child   suppol:t: collection   service and transfer  the
    performance    of that function     to the Domestic Relations   Office.
    S II ti I4 A R Y
    --
    The Child Support Iklvision of the Harris                 County
    Juvenile     Probation      Department        vas     specifically
    established         by     article         s139w.         V.T.C.S.;
    accordingly,      article     !ilbZa-1.     V.T.C.S.,      does not
    govern the collection         of child support payments in
    Hsrris ‘County.         Additionally,        the Rarrls       County
    CoPnissioners        Court      is    vithout       authority       to
    transfer      the    Child     Support      Division      from the
    Juvenile     Board to the Domestic             Relations      Office
    established      pursuant    to article      2338-le.     V.T.C.S.
    Attorney    General     of Texas
    TOMGREEN
    First Assistant         Attorney     Genercll
    ‘J. 1108
    Honorable   Hike   Drircoll   - Pap* 5   (a-247)
    DAVID R. RICRARDR
    Executive Aeoirtant Attorney       Gen.eral
    RICK CILPIN
    chairman, oplnloa      comitte*
    Prepared    by Tony Culllory
    Aaei8tant    Attorney General
    APPROVD:
    OPINIONCOMHITTSE
    Rick Gilpin,   Cbairmsn
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrlron
    Tony Guillory
    Jim Hoellingcr
    Jennifer  Rig@
    Nancy Sutton
    p. 1109
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-247

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017