Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                                 The Attorney General of Texas
    Dec:e:mber 13.    1984
    JIM MAlTOX
    Attorney General
    Suprrms Court Building         Carlo8 D. Codlnez, M.D.                          Opinion No. m-244
    P. 0. BOX 12545                President
    Austin. TX. 7571% 2545         Texas State Board ofi                            Re:    Whether the Texas State
    512i475.2501                      Medical Examine::r#                           Board of Medical Examiners may
    Telex 9!0/874-1357
    Telecopier 5121475.0265
    P, 0. Box 13562, Capitol       Station           use hearing examiners to conduct
    Austin, Texas    78”:. 1                         hearing of contested    csses   and
    to draft proposals  for decisions
    714 Jackson. Suite 700                                                          therein
    Dallrr. TX. 75202.4506
    2141742.5944
    Dear Dr. Godinez:
    4524 Albe‘la Ave.. Suite 160          You inform UII that the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners
    El Paw TX. 799052792           wishes to utilize      hearing examiners to conduct hearings of contested
    91515353484                    cases presented before the board.           You also inform us that the board
    is presently      con’iucting    disciplinary    hearings    before the entire
    1 Texas). Suib 7OQ       fifteen   member bo;u:d.      You vish to utilize      hearing examiners as an
    , ,.,us,on. TX. 77002-3111     alternative    to your present method as a more cost effective       procedure.
    713/22-3-5888                  In that regard you .ask:
    Do     t‘he    Medical     Practice  Act    and  the
    806 Broadway. Suile 312
    Lubbock. TX. 79401379
    Administrative       Procedure and Texas Register   Act
    S(w747.5225                               empower the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners
    to utiUze       hearing examiners to conduct hearings
    in contjzsted      cases and to draft    proposals  for
    4309 N. Tenth. Suite B
    McAllen. TX. 78501.1885
    decisions      therein    as more fully   described   in
    5121682.4547                              section    ‘15 of the Administrative     Procedure and
    Texas Register Act?
    200 Main Plaza. Suite 400           The state of Texas has adopted the general rule that where            a
    San Antonio. TX. 78205-2797
    statute permits ar. administrative   authority   to delegate the taking of
    51212254191
    evidence to less l:han the whole number, to a single member, or to an
    examiner for this purpose,     a hearing before such delegate      is not a
    A” Equal OpportunityI         denial of due pro#:ess.    See Colorado County Federal Savings and Loan
    Affirmative Action Employer   Assn. v. Lewis. 49.3 S.W.x723.      (Tex. Civ. -App. - Austin 1973, writ
    ref’d   n.r.e.1:  AlXorney General Opinion M-687       (1970)  (Texas Water
    Rights Comission    has implied power-to utilize    examiners under article
    7542a. V.T.C.S.);   see also 2 Am. Jur. 2d Administrative     Law. 5407. p.
    217-218 (1974); Aanot. 
    18 A.L.R. 2d 606
    (1951).
    Article   44951,,   section    4.05(a),    V.T.C.S..   the Medical   Practice
    Act,   provides:
    p. 1095
    Dr. Carlos    D. Codinez - Page 2        (JM-244)
    (a)   All hearin;g:r conducted        under this    sub-
    chapter     by the kard        shall     comply with      the
    provisions    of the Administrative      Procedure Act and
    the board’s      rules.   The board may delegate          the
    authority     to conduct     hearings     under this    sub-
    chapter to a hearjig        committee comprised of not
    less than three mehbers appointed by the board.
    The composi ,tlon of such COI      mnittee shall be con-
    sistent    with the p,covisions     of Sections    2.08 and
    2.09 of this Act. -Any individual            or individuals
    conducting     a hearjig    under this      subchapter    are
    empowered to administer oaths and receive evidence
    at the hearing       and shall    report    the hearing as
    prescribed    by board-rules.      (Emphasis added).
    Thus, the legislature     t.as authorized     the Texas State Board of
    Medical Examiners to delegate their duty to conduct contested          cases in
    disciplinary   matters to a hewing committee composed of not less than
    three members. See Cobra Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sadler,             
    447 S.W.2d 887
    .
    (Tex. 1969).     Thelegislatu&        specified    that the hearing committee
    must be composed of board ms:mbers. We are of the opinion              that the
    legislature   did not authoriie      the board to delegate     the function   of
    conducting disciplinary      hear::ngs In contested     cases to persons other
    than members of the board.       Of course, the hearing coPlmittee must also
    comply with the provisions      of sections     13 and 15 of article  6252-13a,
    V.T.C.S.
    gUMMARY
    Article  4495b, wction     4.05(a),    V.T.C.S..    does
    not authorize     the ‘Texas State Board of Medical
    Examiners   to dekgate       their     duty   to    conduct
    contested   casee    in disciplinary       matters    to a
    single hearing examiner.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOMGREEN
    First Assistant     Attorney   General
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney        General
    p. 1096
    Dr. Carlos   D. Godiner - Pags 3   (JX-244)
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Connittec
    Prepared by Tony Guillory
    Assistant Attorney General
    .APPROVRD:
    OPINIONCOMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpin. Chairman
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrisori
    Tony Gulllory
    Jim Moellinger
    Jennifer Riggs
    Nancy Sutton
    p. 1097
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-244

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017