-
The Attorney General of Texas Dec:e:mber 13. 1984 JIM MAlTOX Attorney General Suprrms Court Building Carlo8 D. Codlnez, M.D. Opinion No. m-244 P. 0. BOX 12545 President Austin. TX. 7571% 2545 Texas State Board ofi Re: Whether the Texas State 512i475.2501 Medical Examine::r# Board of Medical Examiners may Telex 9!0/874-1357 Telecopier 5121475.0265 P, 0. Box 13562, Capitol Station use hearing examiners to conduct Austin, Texas 78”:. 1 hearing of contested csses and to draft proposals for decisions 714 Jackson. Suite 700 therein Dallrr. TX. 75202.4506 2141742.5944 Dear Dr. Godinez: 4524 Albe‘la Ave.. Suite 160 You inform UII that the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners El Paw TX. 799052792 wishes to utilize hearing examiners to conduct hearings of contested 91515353484 cases presented before the board. You also inform us that the board is presently con’iucting disciplinary hearings before the entire 1 Texas). Suib 7OQ fifteen member bo;u:d. You vish to utilize hearing examiners as an , ,.,us,on. TX. 77002-3111 alternative to your present method as a more cost effective procedure. 713/22-3-5888 In that regard you .ask: Do t‘he Medical Practice Act and the 806 Broadway. Suile 312 Lubbock. TX. 79401379 Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act S(w747.5225 empower the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners to utiUze hearing examiners to conduct hearings in contjzsted cases and to draft proposals for 4309 N. Tenth. Suite B McAllen. TX. 78501.1885 decisions therein as more fully described in 5121682.4547 section ‘15 of the Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act? 200 Main Plaza. Suite 400 The state of Texas has adopted the general rule that where a San Antonio. TX. 78205-2797 statute permits ar. administrative authority to delegate the taking of 51212254191 evidence to less l:han the whole number, to a single member, or to an examiner for this purpose, a hearing before such delegate is not a A” Equal OpportunityI denial of due pro#:ess. See Colorado County Federal Savings and Loan Affirmative Action Employer Assn. v. Lewis. 49.3 S.W.x723. (Tex. Civ. -App. - Austin 1973, writ ref’d n.r.e.1: AlXorney General Opinion M-687 (1970) (Texas Water Rights Comission has implied power-to utilize examiners under article 7542a. V.T.C.S.); see also 2 Am. Jur. 2d Administrative Law. 5407. p. 217-218 (1974); Aanot.
18 A.L.R. 2d 606(1951). Article 44951,, section 4.05(a), V.T.C.S.. the Medical Practice Act, provides: p. 1095 Dr. Carlos D. Codinez - Page 2 (JM-244) (a) All hearin;g:r conducted under this sub- chapter by the kard shall comply with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and the board’s rules. The board may delegate the authority to conduct hearings under this sub- chapter to a hearjig committee comprised of not less than three mehbers appointed by the board. The composi ,tlon of such COI mnittee shall be con- sistent with the p,covisions of Sections 2.08 and 2.09 of this Act. -Any individual or individuals conducting a hearjig under this subchapter are empowered to administer oaths and receive evidence at the hearing and shall report the hearing as prescribed by board-rules. (Emphasis added). Thus, the legislature t.as authorized the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners to delegate their duty to conduct contested cases in disciplinary matters to a hewing committee composed of not less than three members. See Cobra Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sadler,
447 S.W.2d 887. (Tex. 1969). Thelegislatu& specified that the hearing committee must be composed of board ms:mbers. We are of the opinion that the legislature did not authoriie the board to delegate the function of conducting disciplinary hear::ngs In contested cases to persons other than members of the board. Of course, the hearing coPlmittee must also comply with the provisions of sections 13 and 15 of article 6252-13a, V.T.C.S. gUMMARY Article 4495b, wction 4.05(a), V.T.C.S.. does not authorize the ‘Texas State Board of Medical Examiners to dekgate their duty to conduct contested casee in disciplinary matters to a single hearing examiner. JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas TOMGREEN First Assistant Attorney General DAVID R. RICHARDS Executive Assistant Attorney General p. 1096 Dr. Carlos D. Godiner - Pags 3 (JX-244) RICK GILPIN Chairman, Opinion Connittec Prepared by Tony Guillory Assistant Attorney General .APPROVRD: OPINIONCOMMITTEE Rick Gilpin. Chairman Colin Carl Susan Garrisori Tony Gulllory Jim Moellinger Jennifer Riggs Nancy Sutton p. 1097
Document Info
Docket Number: JM-244
Judges: Jim Mattox
Filed Date: 7/2/1984
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017