Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                                    The Attorney                           General             of Texas
    ‘:M MAllOX                                                         Dl:c:embcr 21.          1984
    ttornry General
    Iprm    Cowl Bulldlna
    nr. ~0-n     a; winfrlqr                                                 “Opinion Ro. a-256
    I-. 0. Box 125a                    Director   and LibrarAm
    AUUl% T% m11.2545                  Texas State   Library 6 Archivea                                ”         lte:  Auihotity of the Texas
    ‘2l4?52501                        Comirrion                                                              State    Library    and  Archives
    lles s1cfs7413s7
    P. 0.     Box 12927                                                 i     Msrion        to tramfcr federal
    :.l.wplw      5lU475-0255
    Austin.     Texar   707:.1.                                               funds to other atate agcnejes
    for library    remices
    4 Jukwn.    Sull4 700
    UalllS, lx. 752a24505              Deer Hr.      Winfrey:
    214fl42dou
    You ask whether the Teuo State Library      Comisrioo      has authority
    4524 Alberm Ave.. SIN.       Is0   under article 5435, V.T.C.S.,     to grant federal     funds to state     clee-
    El P440, lx. 7wo52792              mosyrury lnstitutiom     to use in developing  library    services   for their
    15f53534w                         residents.
    .   .;
    la01 1*x**, SIllI* 700
    Your first querrtion is *s follow:
    ourton. TX. 77002.3111
    13l225ww                                           Is   it    legal  for  the Library.   end Archive8
    Comissiou      to make l cash grant from federsl funds
    to enother ltete board or ‘comissfon to inprove
    3s Broww~y. SUIN 312
    umock. l-x. rB4a.3479
    library     ‘wwices    for resident.    of that state
    w&747.5235                                       in~titutitnl?                        i
    -.>’   . _.i- .,‘~_Z                     . ,.:7.     *.
    ?..
    The comissjon lus for uny years purebased library uterials        for
    3W N. 1011th Sulb B
    state inetitutionr      fron federal funds.    %   V.T.C.S. art. 5436. It
    ucAll4n. lx. 7Bw~le.s
    5lm524547
    ha0 not made cash grants in the past nnd wishes to knov vhether     it has
    such authority    under: section 1 of article 5435, V.T.C.S.
    ._     ( : .                  .
    You next         wk
    vhether            such grents be subjectvouldto the condl”
    .tionr           and l$mit~tiom             of
    an lnterasency coopera-
    tion coutract as provided       for in the Interagency
    Cooperstiou  Act, article     4413(32),    or vh+ther the
    COIID~SS~OIImay enter     into grant agreement8       vlth
    other sgencies   under article      5435 under its ova
    authority   and vithout       approval    of    the  State
    Purehasiql  and Cenersl    Services    Cmrsioa.
    Contracts     entered    into    under    the   Interagency     Cooperation    Act are
    subject     to spproval       by the State       purchasing    and Genersl    Servicer
    Cotmiesion.       V.T.C, !1. art.      441302).       i5.   If   the co~ission      has
    luthority      to         make such        grant8       under          article    5635,   V.T.C.S..   you vlsh
    Hr. Dorm6n R. Yinfrey        - Psgo :I      (J?k256)
    to know vhether  its dircretioll          to formulate grant          contract   term vould
    be limlted  by the requirementm           of the Interagency          Cooperation   Act.
    You finally    ask:
    Would such a federnl grant or interagenry        contract
    to 6nother       agency  be prohibited    by nrticle     V.
    section    58 of the 1984-1985 Cenerel Approprlationr
    Act,    Senate    Bill  No. 179. Sixty-eighth       Legis-
    16ture.    Regular Session.   1983, unless  lpecific6lly
    6uthorized     in the Approprietioor   Act?
    Sections   2 through 5        of  article     5435. V.T.C.S. c set. out various
    pavers    of the     ,~0118s1on,        such as certlfylni         county     librarians.
    appointing     a director    and    state     librarian    as vell  as other personnel
    for the State Library and           Archives , and developing       personnel     policies
    and procedures.         Section     1 of article         5435, V.T.C.S.,    provides       6s
    follov6:
    The Cotiselon           6h611 be responsible              for the
    adoption of all po:.fleiee,          rules 6nd regulationa            so
    .
    a6 to ald and encourage               the development           of and
    cooper8tioo         nmong: all         types        of     lfbreriee,
    including      but not       limited      to publlc.         ecndeoic.
    special,     and other         types    of    libraries.       collect
    materialr     releting     to the history         of Texas and the
    adjoining      6tate6.     preserve.       classify      and publish
    the unuscript         archives     and such other utters               as
    it my deem proper. diffuse               luwuledge      in regerd to
    the history        of Twas,        encourage       historical      vork
    and research.        url:   historic       sites    6nd houses and
    secure their        preewvation,         and aid those uho are
    studying       the     problems      to      be    de6lt      vith     by
    legisletlon.
    &dminietrative   lgencler have only those powers lxpreealy granted
    by statute or necessarily          inplied     from express    powers.    Stauffer    Q.
    City    of San Antonio,      344 !j.W.Zd 158 (Tex. 1961).              Article     5435,
    V.T.C.S.,     does not l  rprees:ly     authorise     the cmi8sion      to mnke cash
    grants    to other     etnte  lgenc!ee for library purposes.               Ue do not
    believe    this   pover is necec:sarlly       implied    from article   5435, section
    1.
    Prior opinion6      of this clffice have required express authorization
    for   state     agencies   to institute      cash grant programs.         Sea Attorney
    General Opinions N-532 (191G!) (Agricultural              Extension SeGe        may not
    make grants for reforestation);           H-1272 (1978) (Hobile Home Pcrfonnanca
    Certification       Board may nof, make grants        for consumer educetion);       cf.
    R-120 (1973) (express         statwory    authority    neceeenry to receive     fade=
    grants).       The legl6lature     has in feet l    xpraeely   suthorlzed    6ome state
    agencies      to make cash grants       to other lntitiee.        See. e.g.,   V.T.C.S.
    p.   1140
    ?
    Mr. Dorun         Il. Winfrey     - Page 3        (``-256)
    art.  46d-12 (Texas Aeroneutjco      Conm~ission);     V.T.C.S.  err. 4413(201),
    14 (Texar Department of Cotmmity        Affairs).      See also Attorney Cenerol
    Opinions    W-423    (1982);   H-XL6 (1974);      a-l-0;             C-673 (1966)
    (construing   statures    that upreaely     authorize     stare agencies to oake
    granrs).
    The coneritution       vests :in the legislature        authority   to direct how
    public funds shall be used and ro allocare                them among efate agencies.
    Tex. Consr. art. III. 135, !i44; art.             VIII, 16.       See Attorney General
    Opinion     H-207 (1974);        Letter   Advisory     lo.    2 (1973)      (legislation
    authorizing     governor    Lo rraaefer    funds betveen appropriaLlon            items is
    unconstirutional).         The legislature      exercises     this paver by enacting
    general laws defining        the aglcncy’s powers and duties end by approprie-
    ting funds to the agency to carry out Its Legislative                     mandate.       The
    General Appropriations          Act lo recent years         has included     a provision
    appropriating      federal    funds to the agencies         which receive      them.     See
    Acts 1983, 68th Leg., ch. lC95, art. V. 120. at 6216; Acts 1955, 54th
    kg..     ch. 519, lrf. VI, 124, at 1593; Attorney               Caner.1 Opinion M-266
    (1968).     Appropriations      not expended     or obligated      by rhe end of the
    sppropriation      ~perlod lapse .old return        to the treasury.         Tex , Const .
    art. VIII. 56; Attorney Gener.11 Opinions O-5266 (1943); O-2941 (1940).
    When the legislature        a``l:horizee an agency to grant appropriated
    funds to other state         agencj,?:;,    It has delegated       avey come of its ovn
    authority    to allocate      public      funds among state        agencies.      We cannot
    conclude that the legislature            intended broad, general language such as
    that found in article        5435, section       1, to Include power ro grant funds
    to ocher agencies.           The lq~ielature         has expressly       authorized      some
    agencies,    including    the State Library Comiseion.              ro make grants under
    statutory    guidellnee.       See V.T.C.S. arts.        5436. 5436e; 5446..         Federal
    .?rant programs are basrotl              express    euthorisacion      by Congress.       See
    Uaeon,    Hi~hlighte.     in -- Fede::al -Grant Lav, l-2          04. l&son -cd.      198x
    Madden, The Conetitucional           2nd Legal       Foundations     of Pederel      Grants.
    &     10-11;   Mason. Grant      Rule Making.       
    id. 45. Such
    statutes     vould   be
    eurplusage      if states       and ‘iiederal      agencies     could    establish      grant
    programs in reliance        on implied powers.
    The Texas          courts    have   not decided       whether a state          agency must
    have     express         statutory      authority       to make cash           grants    to other
    agencies.          We cannot,          horwver,      reasonably       adopt       a doctrine     of
    Htatutory        construction        vhich would automaticallv              give   agencies   such
    paver     unless       the legislatwr6:       expressly      denied     it.      In our opinion,
    legislative         silence      on the riubject       of cash     grants     to other agencies
    signifies        legislative       intent    to withhold        power EO make grants.          The
    State      Library    and      Archives    Coaunission      iacks    authoritv    to   make    cash
    grants      to    other     state     agencies     under    .secrion      I of   article      5435.
    V.T.C.S.
    Eecause   the commission    Idcks .lrlchority   CP make a S~dal~ grant     from
    federal     lends   to a stnte   iwcitution      to improve  itbrarv   services      ior
    its   residents,      we need nnt address      vour   second  ?rd third     questinns
    hr.   Uormar: Il. Winfray      - I’tyu 0     (J&256)
    which concern       whether      utbcr ~wn’lsioor   of law vould            apply to such
    trannactions.       If   the    lcglol``ture vinhee to luthorjze            the cocaieeion
    to make such Srsnts,        problms     rained    by these    provisiuns    ten be
    resolved   in the legislative       procero.     See Attorney Cenerel      Opinions
    R-170 (1973);    H-601 (1970);       W-1120    (t961)  (alternative      murce~ of
    euthor1t.y for perticular     intcr.mRency contracts).
    Article   5435. V,T.C.S.,     doea not authorize      the
    Texas State Libraty         end Archives     Comiesion      to
    transfer     federal     funds   to    state   lleemosyarry
    institutions     for library   services.        _    -
    JIM        l4ATTOX
    Attorney    Ctnerd   of   T~XJS
    ToI+ GREEN
    Hrst   Assistant    Attorney       Cemral
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant        Attorney   General
    RILX GILPIN
    Chairman. Opinion       Comlttee
    Prepared    by Susan L. Garrlsou
    Asulstant    Attorney General
    APPuovNo :
    OPINIONCOl4HlTTEE
    Rick Cilpin.   Chairman
    Colin Carl
    Susan Gsrriam
    Tony Cuillory
    Jfm Noellinger
    Jennifer   Riggs
    Nancy Sutton
    p. 1142
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-256

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017