Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                r-. .
    .,            -
    .
    The Attorney         General of Texas
    JIM MATTOX                                         July 26, 1984
    Attorney Gerikral
    Supreme Court Building         Honorable Larry W. ~illison           Opinion No. JM-182
    P. 0. Box 12546                Lampasas County Atwmey
    Aus!in. TX. 76711.2546         P. 0. Box 95                          Ret   Whether a commissioners
    512/47&2501                    Lampasas, Texas   ?li550              court is authorized to estab-
    Telex 9101674-1387
    Telecopier  512/475-0266
    lish working hours for elected
    county officials
    714 Jackson, Suite 700         Dear Mr. Allison:
    Dallas, TX. 75202-4506
    214/742-6944
    You have requtsted our opinion regarding the authority of the
    commissioners court to dictate the office hours to be observed by
    4624 Alberta Ave., Suite 160   other elected county officials. You have asked specifically whether
    El Paso, TX. 799052793         the commissioners I:ourt has authority to order offices to be open
    Q15/533-3464                   during the lunch hollr. It is our opinion that the commissioners court
    lacks authority tc' enter an enforceable order, punishable under the
    rc-
    .Wl Texas, Suite 700
    court's contempt authority, which instructs independently elected
    Houston. TX. 77002-3111        county officials to maintain specified office hours.
    Attorney Gene::al Opinion O-6679 (1945) determined that      the
    commissioners court, being of limited jurisdiction, lacked authority
    606 Broadway, Suite 312
    Lubbock, TX: 79401-3479
    to adopt a 6-day! 48-hour work week for all county offices. It
    6061747-5236                   further concluded that the county auditor did not have authority to
    deduct amounts fcm      the salary checks for those officers not
    maintaining office hours "ordered by the commissioners court." See
    4309 N. Tenth. Suite S
    generally Tex. Const. art. XVI, 910 (authority of legislature=
    McAllen, TX. i6501-1665
    512/662-4547
    provide for deduct,lonsin pay for public officials neglecting official
    duties). There is no enabling legislation under this provision of the
    constitution which allows a commissioners court to reduce the pay of
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400      county officials who do not observe specified office hours. Cf.
    San Antonio, TX. 76205-2797
    Miller v. James, 
    366 S.W.2d 118
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Austin. 1963,x
    512/2254191
    writ)  (court may not provide deductions in pay in absence of enabling
    legislation); but cf., &torney        General Opinion MW-438 (1982)
    An Equal Opportunityl          (authority of commissioners court to control conditions of employment
    Alflrmative Action Employer    for county employeet:1).
    Attorney Ger.fral opinion C-350    (1964) concluded that a
    constitutional cocrty official could close his office on Saturdays
    without the consent and approval of the commissioners court. The
    opinion relived on Attorney General Opinion O-6679 (1945) and the
    fundamental propoxtion that a commissioners court has only that
    authority which is conferred upon it either explicitly or by
    p. 800
    Honorable Larry W. Allison - Page 2 (JM-182)
    Implication by the state constitution and      statutes.   Canales v.
    Laughlin, 
    214 S.W.2d 451
    (Ter. 1948).
    Attorney General Opinicn M-1197 (1972) held that a commissioners
    court did not have the autt,crityto compensate a justice of the peace
    on an hourly ba,sis for tt,cse hours actually worked for the reason
    that, in 1972, a justica! of the peace was required under the
    constitution to be compensated on either a fee basis or a salary basis
    and that an hourly rate of compensation was neither. See Tex. Const.
    art. XVI, $61. The opiniclr.  further reasoned that th~ommissioners
    court did not have the authority to establish the office hours for the
    office of justice of the pc!s:ceby the means of compensating him on an
    hourly basis. The commisslcners court does not have the authority to
    interfere with or usurp the duties and performance of independent
    county officials and employees. Pritchard and Abbott v. HcKenna, 
    350 S.W.2d 333
    (Tex. 1961) I:c:ontractwith private firm to appraise
    property in county).
    There is no general state law which dictates office hours or the
    work week to be observed by county officials and employees. In
    counties over 500,000 population the commissioners court, pursuant to
    special statute, has explicit authority to adopt
    rules and regulatlnrs governing the hours of work,
    vacations, holidir:s, sick leave, medical care,
    hospitalisation,   compensation    and    accident
    insurance, and inductions for absences . . . .
    (Emphasis added).
    V.T.C.S. art. 237211, 01.     Counties over 200,000 population may
    establish a civil service commission which has the authority, among
    other things, to adopt rules relating to the "rights, benefits, and
    working conditions" of count:yemployees which we believe may include
    the authority to adopt offix hours. V.T.C.S. art. 2372h-6. 68(s)(7);
    see also V.T.C.S. art. 237,!h-8 (sheriff's department civil service
    system in counties of more t'ran950,000 population). A second statute
    gives commissioners courts of counties over 500,000 population the
    authority to adopt and enfor:e
    reasonable regulations applying to all such
    deputies, assistants. employees or department
    heads governing the hours of work, vacations, and
    sick leaves, in the interest of obtaining uniform
    restrictions,    ~:~nrditions, and     regulations
    governing all such deputies, assistants, employees
    or department heads in the manner now provided by
    law.
    V.T.C.S. art. 3912e-4a, 14.                                              .-
    p. 801
    --
    ,-
    -        Honorable I.arryW. All~ison-.Page 3     (JM-182)
    other statutes of narrow applicability concern the hours of work
    for persons employed by a county. See, e.g., V.T.C.S. arts. 6871,
    5165.1, 5167a. See also Elt:c.Code art. 5.09c; Elec. Code art. 5.24a,
    subdivision 10 (office of tcunty elections administrator required to
    remain open on election day). There is, however, no general statute
    applicable to counties which specifies office hours or gives the
    commissioners court the autt.crityto determine such hours. See, e.g.,
    V.T.C.S. art. 5165a (full-l::lme state employees required to work 40
    hours per week; normal sta':tzoffice hours set at 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
    p.m., Monday through Friday); V.T.C.S. art. 6871; see also V.T.C.S.
    art. 5167a (peace officers ir counties over 500,000 population may not
    be required to work more than the normal county work week). We
    conclude therefore that the commissioners court of Lampasss County has
    no authority to establish office hours for other elected county
    officials.
    SUMMARY
    The commissioners court of Lampasas County does
    not have the authority to establish office hours
    for other elected county officials.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by David Brooks
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpin, Chairman
    David Brooks
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Jim Moellinger
    Nancy Sutton
    p. 802
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-182

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017