Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                                      The Attorney         General of Texas
    JIM MATTOX
    June 21, 1984
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court Building             Honorable Romeo Flares                Opinion No. JM-174
    P. 0. BOX 12546
    Austin, TX. 76711. 2546
    County Attorney
    5121475.2501                       Jim Wells County Courthouse           Re: Whether a justice precinct
    Telex 910/674-1367                 200 North Almond                      which contains a city of 8.000
    Telecopier   51214750266           P. 0. Drawer 2080                     or more must elect two justices
    Alice, Texas   78333                  of the peace
    714 Jackson, suite 700
    Dallas, TX. 75202.4506             Dear Mr. Flores:
    2141742.6944
    You have requested our opinion regarding the effect of article
    2375, V.T.C.S., which provides:
    4624 Alberta Ave., Suite 160
    El Paso, TX. 79905.2793
    915/533-3464                                    Where there is a city of eight thousand
    inhabitants or more in a justice precinct, two
    justices of the peace shall be elected.
    -1     Texas, Suite 700
    Mon. TX. 77002-3111
    You have asked whether this provision is mandatory.
    7131223.5666
    The determination of the number of justice precincts in a county
    606 Broadway, Suite 312            is made pursuant to article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution as
    Lubbock. TX. 79401-3479            amended in 1983. Obviously. this constitutional nrovision sunersedes
    6061747-5236
    any contrary statutory pr&i.sions. Section 18 provides in pertinent
    part as follows:
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite B
    McAllen, TX. 76501-1665                        Each county in the State with a population of
    5121662.4547
    30,000 or more, according to the most recent
    federal census, from time to time, for the
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400                   convenience of the people, shall be divided into
    San Antonio, TX. 76205-2797                 not less than four and not more than eight
    51212254191                                 precincts.   Each county in the State with a
    population of 18,000 or more but less than 30,000,
    An Equal Opportunity/
    according to the most recent federal census, from
    Affirmative    Action   Employer            time to time, for the convenience of the people,
    shall be divided into not less than two and not
    more than five precincts. Each county in the
    State with a population of less than 18,000,
    according to the most recent federal census, from
    time to time, for the convenience of the people,
    shall be designated as a single precinct or, if
    the Commissioners Court determines that the county
    needs more than one precinct, shall be divided
    into not more than four precincts. The division
    or designation shall be made by the Commissioners
    p. 765
    Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 2   (JM-174)
    Court provided for by this Constitution. In each
    such precinct there shall be elected one Justice
    of the Peace and one Constable, each of whom shall
    hold his office for four years and until his
    successor shall be elected and qualified; provided
    that in any precinct in which there may be a city
    of 18,000 or more inhabitants, there shall be
    elected two Justices of the Peace.       (Emphasis
    added).
    The 1980 census population of Jim Wells County is 36,498.         The
    underlined portion of section 18 above had, before the amendment,
    provided for two justices of the peace in any precinct containing a
    city of 8,000 or more. Article 2375, V.T.C.S., wss not amended by the
    legislature in 1983 and to the extent that it requires a different
    number of justice precincts than that required by the Texas
    Constitution, it is invalid. We believe that your question becomes,
    therefore, whether the constitution requires or only permits the
    election of two justices of the peace, place one and plsce two, in a
    precinct containing a city of 18,000 population.
    The Texas Supreme Court in Williams v. Castleman, 
    247 S.W. 263
    (Tex. 1922), held that under article V, section 18, the commissioners
    court had discretion to determine and enter a finding that a city
    contained a population of more than 8,000.         In that case the
    commissioners court had consulted the city postmaster and the local
    chamber of commerce to determine the population of the city' of
    Breckenridge. and it found that the city had a population of more than
    8,000 and thereupon created a justice of the peace place two in that
    precinct. This finding of a city's population or the failure to do so
    is subject to a charge of abuse of discretion, fraud, or
    arbitrariness. The commissioners court is not limited to the federal
    census in determining the population of a city for the purposes of
    article V, section 18. In the absence of fraud, abuse of discretion,
    or capriciousness, a commissioners court finding whether a city
    contains a population of 8,000 or more cannot be attacked. The court
    held that the complaining party in the case, the justice of the peace
    place one, did not show that the commissioners court finding that the
    city of Breckenridge contained the population of more than 8,000 was
    an abuse of discretion and that he was therefore not entitled to
    relief.
    The implication of the Williams case is that, if a city within a
    justice precinct clearly contains a population of more than 8,000 (now
    18,000) it would be an abuse of discretion for the commissioners court
    to find otherwise. In this sense, the provision of article 18
    requiring two justices of the peace in a precinct containing such a
    city is mandatory, although the operative facts -- that is the
    population of the city -- is a matter for determination by the
    commissioners court. We believe that the language of section 18 is
    p. 766
    Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 3   (JM-174)
    clear that there "shall" be elected two justices of the peace in a
    precinct containing a city of more than 18,000 population.
    Opinions from this office and Texas courts, however, have
    confused the issue as to whether or not section 18 is mandatory.
    Attorney General Opinion O-2847 (1940) concluded that section 18 was
    mandatory.   That opinion reflects that the 1940 federal census
    population of the city of Lufkin, located within a justice of the
    peace precinct, was 9,500 inhabitants. The opinion stated that the
    commissioners court is not bound by the federal census in determining
    the population of a city and may find that the population has
    decreased since the last census. The appeals court in Grant v.
    Ammerman. 
    451 S.W.2d 777
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Texarkana 1970, writ ref'd
    n.r.e.), also held that section 18 was mandatory as to the appointment
    of a second justice. The court held that the commissioners court did
    not have the authority to abolish one of the two justice positions in
    a justice of the peace precinct containing the city of Marshall, which
    had a population of over 8,000. The opinion did not discuss the
    Williams case nor did it conclude that the commissioners court had
    abused its discretion. It simply held that the word "shall" is
    mandatory and requires two justices of the peace to be elected in a
    precinct containing a city of 8.000 inhabitants.          We believe,
    nevertheless, that this case was correctly decided.
    The appeals court in Meredith v. Sharp, 
    256 S.W.2d 870
    (Tex. Civ.
    APP. - Texarkana), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curia*, 
    259 S.W.2d 172
    (Tex.
    1953). held that the provisions of section 18 regarding two justices
    of the peace in a precinct containing a city of 8,000 was not
    mandatory, but rather that it was within the discretion of the
    commissioners court to allow two justices of the peace to be elected
    in a single precinct if "for the convenience of the people." We
    believe that this decision was in error and, in any event, the supreme
    court in refusing a writ of error stated that the case should have
    been dismissed by the trial court. &,     
    259 S.W.2d 172
    (Tex. 1953).
    The appeals court in Meredith apparently was confused by the language
    in section 18 which provides that the number of justice of the peace
    precincts and their boundaries are to be determined by the
    commissioners court "for the convenience of the people" upon a
    relevant finding of population -- a finding involving some discretion.
    We believe that this phrase is not applicable to the requirement that
    two justices of the peace be elected in a precinct containing a city
    of, now, 18,000, because the population has been determined and there
    is no longer any discretion to be exercised. In that pre-1983 case a
    taxpayer of Gregg County sued the commissioners court to compel it to
    create a place two for a justice of the peace precinct containing the
    city of Longview which without dispute contained more than 8,000
    inhabitants.
    The Meredith court found that the creation of an additional
    justice of the peace position was a discretionary act on the part of
    the commissioners court which was permitted if found to be for the
    p. 767
    Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 4    (JM-174)
    convenience of the people. The opinion relied on the Williams v.
    Castleman case for the proposition that the commissioners court has
    discretion in establishing justice of the peace precincts and their
    lines. We believe, as we indicated before, that this proposition was
    based on a misreading of Williams because the discretion discussed in
    the Williams case pertained to the finding that a city has the
    requisite population.     Attorney General Opinion WW-1251 (1962)
    followed the Meredith case and concluded that the Gray County
    Commissioners Court could abolish one of the two justice of the peace
    positions in a precinct containing~the city of Pampa with a population
    of more than 24,000. This opinion was wrongly decided and is hereby
    overruled.
    Attorney General Opinion C-566 (1965) concerned the election to
    justice of the peace precinct one, place two in Hale County, which
    wholly contained the city of Plainview, with a population of more than
    18,000 under the federal census. The commissioners court of Hale
    County had never entered an order declaring the population of
    Plainview to be more than 8,000 in creating a place two position. The
    attorney general found that, unless and until the cotmaissionerscourt
    declares a city to be over 8,000 (now 18,000 population) and orders
    the creation of a place two position, candidates may not file for such
    a non-existent office. This opinion is correct to the extent that it
    requires some action on the part of the commissioners court before a
    place two position is created. To the extent, however, that the
    opinion held that the place two position must be determined by the
    commissioners court to be "for the convenience of the people," it is
    overruled. As we have stated above, the only discretion that a
    commissioners court has is in determining the population of a city.
    Once that population is determined to be in excess of 18,000
    population, it does not have discretion to find that the convenience
    of the people does not require a place two position.
    SUMMARY
    Article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution
    requires the election of two justices of the peace
    in a precinct if it is determined by the
    commissioners court that the precinct contains a
    city of more than 18,000 inhabitants.
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    p. 768
    Honorable Romeo Flores - Page 5    (JM-174)
    P
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by David Brooks
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpin, Chairman
    David Brooks
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Jim Moellinger
    Nancy Sutton
    p. 769
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-174

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017