Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1983 )


Menu:
  •                                                       The Attorney        General of Texas
    October 12, 1983
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    Supreme      Court Building                  Honorable Henry Wade                   Opinion NO.JM-75
    P. 0. Box 12546                              Dallas County District Attorney
    Austin,    TX. 70711. 2540                   Government Center                      Re: Effective date of article
    5121475.2501
    Dallas, Texas   75202                  2372p-3, relating to regula-
    Telex    9101674-1367
    Telecopier     5121475.0266
    tion of bail bondsmen
    Dear Mr. Wade:            I
    714 Jackson.           Suite 700
    Dallas.   TX.        75202.4506
    The legislature enacted a statute to license and regulate bail
    214/742-6944
    bondsmen which became effective on August 27, 1973. See V.T.C.S. art.
    2372p-3. Effective August 31, 1981, the legislature amended that
    4624       Alberta     Ave.,   Suite   160   statute with a complete m-enactment       designed to more properly
    El Paso, TX.           79905.2793            regulate the bail bond business. Prior to the 1981 amendment, section
    9151533.3464                                 9(b)(3) of that statute provided that a bondsman's license may be
    suspended or revoked by the county bail bond board for "conviction
    -   ,nOl         Texas,    Suite 700                under the laws of this or any other state or of the federal government
    ousto”,     TX. 77002-3111              of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or of a felony." The 1981
    7131223-5666                                 amendment changed that section to provide for suspension or revocation
    of a license for "final conviction under the laws of this or any other
    state or of the United States of a misdemeanor involving moral
    606 Sroadwav.             Suite 312
    Lubbock,     TX:        j9401-3479
    turpitude or of a felony committed after the effective date of this
    606/747-5236                                 Act" and changed section 3(c) to provide that persons who committed
    such crimes after "the effective date of this Act" are not eligible
    for a license. See Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. 312; Acts 1973, 63rd
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite S
    McAllen,     TX. 76501-1665
    Leg., ch. 550.   -
    5121662-4547
    You have asked whether "the effective date of this Act" in
    sections 3(c) and 9(b)(3) of article 2372~3-3is August 27, 1973, the
    200 Main Plaza. Suite 400                date of the original act, or August 31, 1981, the date of the
    San Antonio.  TX. 76205.2797
    amendatory act. We conclude that this phrase refers to August 27,
    5121225-4191
    1973, and that sections 3(c) and 9(b)(3) presently refer to offenses
    committed after August 27, 1973.
    An Equal       Opportunity/
    Affirmative      Action     Employer          In re-enacting article 2372p-3, the legislature used the words
    "this Act" at least 52 times in 10 different sections of that article.
    For instance. the language in section 3(c) is:
    (c) No person shall be eligible for a license
    under this Act, who after the effective date of
    this Act, commits an offense for which he is
    finally convicted . . . (Emphasis added).
    p. 319
    Honorable Henry Wade - Page 2   (JM-75)
    Section 9(b) states that:
    (b) The board may, on its own motion, and
    shall, on receipt of a sworn complaint providing
    reasonable cause to believe that a violation of
    this Act has occurred or on the request of a
    court, investigate the actions and records
    relating to such complaint against any bondsman it
    has licensed. The board may, after notice and
    hearing, suspend or revoke a license for:
    .   .   .   .
    (3) final conviction under the laws of this or
    any other state or of the United States of a
    misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or of a
    felony committed after the effective date of this
    Act
    -    . . . (Emphasis added).
    We conclude that the phrase "this Act" in an amended section of a
    statute ordinarily refers to the original act as amended, and not
    merely to the amending act. We believe that the legislature, in this
    instance, intended the phrase "after the effective date of this Act"
    to refer to the effective date of the original statute and not to the
    effective date of the amending act.        We believe that if the
    legislature intended otherwise, it would have provided for offenses
    committed "after the effective date of this amendment."           This
    conclusion is in accord with decisions reached in other jurisdictions.
    See Henry v. McKay, 
    3 P.2d 145
    , 151 (Wash. 1931); State v. Anderson,
    
    232 P. 238
    (Kan. 1924); Sutherland, Statutory Construction, 4th ed.,
    522.35.
    SUMMARY
    The provisions relating to offenses committed
    "after the effective date of this Act" in article
    2372p-3, sections 3(c) and 9(b)(3), V.T.C.S.,
    refer to August 27, 1973, the date of the original
    act, instead of August 31, 1981, the date of the
    amendatory act.
    dzjf.&
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    p. 320
    .   .
    Honorable Henry Wade - Page 3      (JM-75)
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Nancy Sutton
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpin, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    David Brooks
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Jim Moellinger
    Nancy Sutton
    Bruce Youngblood
    --
    p. 321
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-75

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1983

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017