Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1980 )

The Attorney General of Texas
April 14, 1980
MARK WHITE
Attorney General
Honorable Ben Z. Grant, Chairman Opinion No. MW-167
Judiciary Committee
House of Representatives Re: Authority of a municipality
Austin, Texas to enact an ordinance providing for
a fine for possession of marihuana.
Dear Representative Grant:
You ask whether there exists in Texas a criminal offense of “criminal
intent” to possess a controlled substance such as marihuana, and whether a
city can enact an ordinance providing for imposition of a fine for possession
of less than two (2) ounces of marihuana.
Criminal intent, or mens rea refers to a culpable mental state defined
by Penal Code section m&which provides that “[al person acts
intentionally, or with intent, with respect to the nature of his conduct or to
a result of his conduct when it is his conscious objective or desire to engage
in the conduct or cause the result” Although “criminal intent,” without
more, would not constitute a penal offense, it is one of the constituent
elements of the offense of “criminal attempt.”
Criminal attempt is defined by Penal Code section 15.01(a), which
provides that “[aI person commits an offense if, with specific intent’ to
commit an offense, he &es an act amounting to more than mere preparation
that tends but fails to effect the commission of the offense intended.” The
punishment for criminal attempt is one category lower than the offense
atte’mpted. Penal Code S 15.01(d).
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has repeatedly held that the
offense of criminal attempt under Penal Code section 15.01 does not apply to
offenses under tbe Controlled Substances Act, article 44i6-15, V.T.C.S.,
which contains no general criminal attempt provision. Brown v. State, 568
S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976) Rx
Crim. App. 1976); Rx parte Barne~,‘&%%$l’``l %?!48~4 lah7;
Moore v. State, 545 S.W.2d 140 (Tex. Grim. App. 1976).
An amendment to section 4.09(a)@) of the Controlled Substances Act,
effective May 2, 1979, prohibits an attempt to acquire or obtain possession
of a controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception, or
;. 532
c ,
7
. -
/~ . . - .
Honorable Ben 2. Grants - Page Two (Mw-167)
subterfuge. However, the legislature did not provide’s general criminal attempt provision
for violations of the Controlled Substances Act.
Since possession of marihuana is regulated by the Controlled Substances Act, there
can be no offense of “criminal intent” (or criminal attempt) to possess marihuana, or any
other controlled substance, unless the attempt to possess the controlled substance
constitutes a fraud offense pursuant to section 4.09(a)(3). An offense under section
4.09(a)(3) is a felony of the second degree if the controlled substance is classified in
Schedule I or II of the Controlled Substances Act. V.T.C.S. art. 4476-15, S 4.09(b)(l).
Marihuana is a Schedule I controlled substance. V.T.C.S. art. 4476-15, § 2.03(d)(13). Ex
574 S.W.2d 568 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Whitaker v. State, 572 S,W.2d 956
Penal Code section LO8 provides:
No governmental subdivision or agency may enact or enforce a law
that makes any conduct covered by this code an offense subject to
a criminal penalty. This section shall apply only as long as the law
governing the conduct proscribed by this code is legally
enforceable.
Penal Code section LO8 is made applicable to the Controlled Substances Act by Penal
Code section L03(b), which provides that the provisions of Titles I, 2, and 3 of the Penal
Code apply to offenses &fined by other laws, unless the statute defining the offense
provides otherwise.
Since the possession of two (2) ounces or.less of marihuana is punishable as a Class B
misdemeanor under section 4.05(b)(3) of the Controlled Substances Act, a municipality
would be preempted by state law from enacting sn ordinance providing for a fine for the
possession of less than two (2) ounces of marihuana as long as section 4.05(b)(3) of the
Controlled Substances Act is legally enforceable.
SUMMARY
There can be no.offense of wcriminal intent” (or criminal attempt)
to ~possess marihuana. A municipality is preempted by state law
from enacting an ordinance providing for the imposition of a fine
for possession of msrihuana.
/-2i!=
MARK WHITE
Attorney General of Texas
JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
First Assistant Attorney General
p. 533
Honorable Ben Z. Grant - PageThree (m-167)
TED L. HARTLEY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Gerald Carruth
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
C. Robert Heath, Chairman
Gerald Carruth
Susan Garrison
Rick Gllpin
Bruce Youngblood
‘P. 534