Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1979 )


Menu:
  •                          The Attorney                General ,of Texas
    August    17,   1979
    MARKWHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Tim Von Dohlen                   Opinion No.    MI+ 4 5
    Chairman, Committee on Regions,
    Compacts & Districts                     Re: Whether a city may dispose
    House of Representatives                   of public land at fair market value
    Austin, Texas                              under article 54211``12,section 2(e),
    V.T.C.S., to a private, nonprofit,
    neighborhood-oriented    corporation
    so that low cost housing may be
    constructed    for resale     to ‘low
    income citizens.
    Dear Representative   Von Dohlen:
    723Main.suae 610            You have, requested our opinion as to the circumstances under which a
    Hannn.TX.no02        city may dispose of land pursuant to section 2(e) of article 5421~12, V.T.C.S.
    713228.0701          Article 5421-12 establishes certain bidding and publication procedures with
    which a political subdivision must comply before it may sell or exchange
    so6emdway.suit*312   land, unless the transaction falls tqithin one .of the exceptions set forth in
    Lumoch.
    TX.7wo1        section 2. Section 2(e) excepts:
    WW-l.7~CO238
    Illand owned by a political subdivision         which it
    desires to have developed by contract           with an
    independent foundation.
    You state that a city wkhes to seU land at fair market value “to a
    private, nonprofit, neighborhood-oriented    corporation  so that low cost
    housing may be constructed thereon’through this corporation for resale, at
    cosf, to low income citixens.n    No actual development of the land for a
    particular purposes would be required by the contract of sale.      You ask
    whether, in such circumstances., the sale is within the exception of section
    2(e).
    Neither article 5421c-12 nor any other Texas statute or judicial
    decision defines the term “independent foundation.” A “foundation” in thii
    context k
    2b. an organization     or institution     established  by
    endowment     . . . or otherwise established        with a
    provision for future maintenance..     . .
    .
    Honorable Tim Von Dohlen       -   Page Two      (Ml+46)
    Webster’s New International     Dictionary (3d ed.), at 898. One court has said that a
    “foundation” is a “corporation with funds for contributing to the endowment of institutions
    as for educational or-charitable work.” In re National Foundation for Diarrheal Diseases,
    
    164 N.Y.S.2d 177
    . 178 (SUD. Ct. 1957). Althoueh it is not clearlv embraced within the
    traditional concept of “foundation,” we cannot Say as a matter of law that the legislature
    intended to exclude from the section 2(e) exception the kind of nonprofit corporation you
    have described. -See 26 U.S.C. 5509 (definition of “private foundation”).
    Section 2(e) Is operative, however, only in those instances ln which the political
    subdivision %ie&es to have [the landI developed by contract ,with an independent
    foundation.” An exception to the bidding statutes should be strictly construed. See ci_ty
    of Corpus Christi v. McClaugherty, 
    284 S.W.2d 927
    , 929 (Tex. Civ. App. - San%tonio
    1955, writ refkl); Town of Port Acres v. City of Port Arthur, 
    340 S.W.2d 325
    , 331 (Tex. Civ.
    - Beaumont 1960 writ ref’d n.r.e.1. See also Attorney General Opinion Ii-1188
    In our opinion tI& terms of the exception require that, as part of the contract of
    sale, the foundation &ree to develop the land ln accordance with the city% specifications.
    We conclude therefore that, although a particular nonprofit corporation may qualify as a
    foundation under the section 2(e) exception to article 5421el2, the exception operates
    only so long as the foundation agrees, under the contract of sale, to develop the land as
    the city may determine.
    SUMMARY
    A particular nonprofit    corporation may qualify as a nfoundationn
    under the section 2(e)   exception to article 5421&2, V.T.C.S., but
    the exception operates   only if the foundation agrees, as part of the
    contract of sale, to     develop the land according to the city’s
    specifications.
    MARK       WHITE
    Attorney   General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    TED L. HARTLEY
    Executive Assistant Attorney   General
    .
    Prepared by Rick Gilpin
    Assistant Attorney General
    P-     139
    -/   :
    Honorable Tim Von Dohlen    -   Page Three        (m-46)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    C. Robert Heath, Chairman
    Jim Allison
    David B. Brooks
    Walter Davis
    Susan Garrison
    Rick Giiin
    Willlam G Reid
    Bruce Youngblood
    .
    P.     140
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-46

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017