Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1979 )


Menu:
  •                         The Attorney General of Texas
    July   25,    1979
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable BiIl Stewart, P.E.                 Opinion No. MW-3 2
    Executive Director
    Texas Air Control Board                      Re: Whether a proposed proce-
    8520 Shoal Creek Boulevard                   dure of the Air Control Board
    Austin, Texas 18758                          violates the Open Meetings Act.
    Dear Mr. Stewart:
    You inform us ihat the Texas Air Control Board may adopt a new
    procedure for requesting the Attorney General to institute civil suits on its
    behalf. You wish to know whether the proposed procedure would violate the
    Open Meetings Act, V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17.
    Article 4477-5, V.T.C.S., provides in part:
    At the request of the board, or the executive
    secretary Iexecutive director] when authorized by the
    board, the attorney       general shall institute    and
    conduct a suit in the name of the State of Texas for
    injunctive relief or to recover the civil penalty, op for
    both injunctive relief and penalty. . . .
    Sec. 4$J2(b). The proposed procedure would require the executive director,
    except in emergencies, to notify all board members of his intention to
    request the Attorney General to bring a civil suit for violations of the Clean
    Air Act or board regulations or orders. Within ten days of notification, any
    board member may request in writing that the matter be placed on the
    agenda of the next board meeting. If three or more members of the board so
    request, the matter will be placed on the agenda. Otherwise, the executive
    director would forward his request to the Attorney General without further
    board action. See Kettlewell v. Hot Mix, Inc., 
    566 S.W.2d 663
    , 668 (Tex.
    Civ. App. - H%iston [lst Dist.1 1978, no writ) (Air Control Board may
    delegate duties to the executive director and other employees).
    Your questions concern the application of the Open Meetings Acts to
    this procedure. The Texas Open Meetings Act applies to deliberation among
    a quorum of members of a governmental body. Sees. l(a), 2(a). We do not
    believe an individual member of a board violates the Open Meetings Act
    when he communicates in writing to the executive director indicating that
    p.    97
    Honorable Bill Stewart, P.E.   -   Page Two        m-32   1
    he wishes to have an item placed on the agenda and sends a copy to other members of the
    board. Of course, the document requesting that an item be placed on the agenda would
    ordinarily be available under the Open Records Act. V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17a. See also
    Texas Open Meetings Act, V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17, S 4(b).
    SUMMARY
    A procedure of the Air Control Board permitting         individual
    members to write to the executive director indicating their desire
    to place an item on the agenda of a future meeting would not
    violate the Open Meetings Act.
    &&
    MARK     WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. PAINTER, JR.
    First Ass&ant Attorney General
    TED L. HARTLEY
    Executive Assiitant Attorney General
    Prepared by Susan Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    C. Robert Heath, Chairman
    David B. Brooks
    Susan Garrison
    Rick Gilpin
    William G Reid
    Bruce Youngblood
    p.    98
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-32

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017