Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •                        The Attorney              General of Texas
    September        19,    1978
    JOHN L. HILL
    Attorney General
    President Duane M. Leach                            Opinion No. H- 1245
    Texas A & I University
    Kingsville, Texas 78383                             Re: Authority of Texas State
    Board      of     Examiners      of
    Psychologists    to require that
    applicants for certification   have
    taken coursework from faculty
    members       who    are     Board-
    certified psychologists.
    Dear President Leach:
    You inform us that the Texas State Board of Examiners of
    Psychologists,     which administers    the Psychologist’s    Certification   and
    Licensing Act, article 4512c, V.T.C.S., has issued a rule requiring applicants
    for certification   to take coursework from professors who are Boardqertified
    psychologists.     General Ruling 400.02.00.010. The rule affects applicants for
    qualification as “sub-doctoral personnel,” who must have a master’s degree.
    V.T.C.S. art. 4512c, S 19. After certification,  these persons use titles such as
    psychological assistant or psychological technician.      
    Id. If the
    applicant’s
    coursework does not comply with the Board’s rule, he is&eligible to take the
    certification    examination.    You ask whether the Board may require that
    professors of psychology at state colleges and universities be certified in
    order to teach in the program which prepares students for Board-administered
    certification examinations.
    Article 4512c, V.T.C.S., prohibits anyone from representing himself to
    be a psychologist within the state unless he is certified or licensed by the
    Board or exempted by the statute.        Sec. 25. We determined in Attorney
    General Opinion H-879 (1976) that the employees of state colleges and
    universities were exempted by section 22(a) from any licensing requirement
    imposed by the Act. The Board has submitted a brief stating that it does not
    require any university faculty member to be certified or licensed as a
    psychologist, and that it does not have statutory authority to promulgate such
    a requirement.       It asserts, however, that the rule merely establishes a
    standard for the qualification     of sub-doctoral personnel as authorized by
    section 19 of article 4512~.
    P.   4952
    President Duane M. Leach     -   Page 2 (H-1245)
    Although section 19 of article 4512~ authorizes the Board to set standards for
    qualification of such personnel, it also states that they must have a master’s degree
    in a program primarily psychological in nature from “an accredited university or
    college.” Accreditation is done by a private professional or educational body, not
    by the Board. -See Ex parte State Board of Law Examiners of Florida, 
    193 So. 753
    (Fla. 1940) (law school); Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. Smith, 
    65 So. 2d 654
    (La.
    Ct. of App. 19531, aff’d, 
    76 So. 2d 722
    (La. 1954) (college of pharmacy). We believe
    the Legislature chose to rely on the judgment of the accrediting body as to the
    qualifications of faculty members and did not authorize the Board to reject degrees
    from accredited institutions on the ground that faculty members were not Board-
    certified.
    In contrast, section 21, which provides for the licensing of a person who offers
    psychological services for compensation, requires that
    (2) he has had at least two year’s experience in the field of
    psychological services, at least . . . one year of which was
    under the supervision of a psychologist licensed under the
    provisions of this Act.
    ‘When the Legislature intended the applicant’s preparation to include work with a
    Board-qualified psychologist, it said so expressly.    We believe, therefore,  the
    Board’s rule constitutes the imposition on subdoctoral personnel of a requirement
    not contemplated by the statute. -Cf. Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of
    Psychologists,  
    492 S.W.2d 460
    (Tex. 1973) (Board may not impose additional
    requirements for applicant under the grandfather clause).
    SUMMARY
    The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists may
    not require that applicants for certification as subdoctoral
    personnel have taken coursework from Board-certified
    psychologists.
    DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant
    p.   4953
    c   .
    President Duane M. Leach   -   Page 3 (H-1245)
    a
    Opinion Committee
    jsn
    P.   4954
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-1245

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017