Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1974 )


Menu:
  •                                        ._    --     .``~     -...   ,-   ..,... ,... .~ ._.,. .__...
    Augu,st 29,      1974
    Mrs.    Jan Ash, Executive Secretary,                      Opinion No.        H-     387
    Texas State Board of Landscape Architects             ’
    320 Sam Houston State. Office Building’                    Re:      C,ompensation   of
    Austin,   Texas ,78701,                                             members    of Board
    of Landscape
    Architects  under
    Dear Mrs.    Ash:                                                   Art. 249c, V. T. C.S.
    Your request for our op$-+ion stems from an apparent conflict between
    Art. 249~. Sec. 4(b), V. T. C.S.,  and an appropriation  to your Board in
    the Appropriations Act for ,f+scal year 1974-1975  (Acts 1973, 63rd Leg.,
    ch. 659, p. 1786).  ;,
    Article   24.9~. Sec. ,3,, cr,eate&be    Texas State Board           of Lasdscape
    Architects.     Section 4 prescribes     the powers and duties           of the Board            and,
    in subsect,ion (b), provides:
    Each member of the board shall receive as
    compensation    for services    performed~in   connec-
    ti,on withhis  duties as such member a sum equal
    to hi.s expenses actually incurred,     provided how-
    ever,   said expenses shall not exceed thi sum of
    $25 per day, exclusive     of travel expense.
    The Appropriations   Act, under the heading “Per Diem of Board
    Members.    3 at $25,” allocates  $1,800 to your board., Apparently,    you
    bave interpreted   this as a per diem all.ocation to be paid regardless  of
    actual expenses.    However,   the Comptroller   has refused to pay on that
    basis.
    “Per diem” does not have a fixed meaning,       and, among other things,
    it may be used to refer to a fixed amount allowed to compensate         for
    expenses actually incurred.     Attorney  General    Opinions H-307   (1974) and
    ‘H-74 (1973). If there is conflict,  the provisions   of the Appropriations
    Act may not overrule general legislation.       Attorney General Opinions
    H-351 (1974), V-1254   (1951). See also Moore v. Sheppard,        
    192 S. W. 2d 559
     (Tex. 1946).
    p.    1818
    Mrs.   Jan Ash,       page 2   (H-387)
    We are of the opinion, therefore,  that the amount of per diem to be
    recovered   by members   of your Board is governed by Art. 249c, Sec. 4(b),
    and is limited to actual expenses incurred,   brovided such expenses do
    not exceed $25.
    SUMMARY
    Where a statute creating an admin:istrative   board
    authorizes  reimbursement    of board members    for actual
    expenses but not to exceed $25 per day, a general approp-
    riation of $25 per diem to them does not authoriae the
    payment of the greater sum.
    Very truly yours,
    u   Attorney    General   of Texas
    .
    Opinion   Comrmttee.
    p.   1819
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-387

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017