Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1974 )


Menu:
  •                             February     11, 1974
    The Honorable Robert S. Calvert             Opinion No. H- 223
    Comptroller  of Public Accounts
    State Finance Building                      Re: Impact of the Open Records
    Austin, Texas                               Act and .tie Open Meetings Act on
    administrative  proceedings held
    by the Comptroller’s   Hearings
    Division
    Dear Mr.   Cdvert:
    You have submitted the follotiing    questions   to us for our opinion:
    1) Keeping the provisi&    of the Open Records Act in
    mind, does Art. 2O.ll(G) or any other provision of
    Title 122A.. Taxation-General,   V. T. C. S. , prohibit
    any official or employee of the ,Comptroller    from:
    a) disclosing the .fact that an individual
    has requested a redetermination      or
    claim for refund.haaring?
    b) disclosing the resolution of legal
    issues, including their factual back-
    grounds, that arose in administrative
    proceedings conducted by the Camp;
    troller’s  Hearings Division when.
    disclosure would identify the individ-
    ual taxpayer who raised the issues?
    2) Do the administrative  proceedings  conducted by the
    Comptroller’s   Hearings Division pursuant to the provisions
    of Title 122a. Tax. -Gen., V. T. C. S., fall within the defi-
    nition of “meeting” as used in the Open Meetings Act, Art.
    6252-17, V. T. C. S. 1
    p. 1040
    The Honorable    Robert    S. Calvert,    page 2 (H-223)
    3) Should the preceding question be answered affirma-
    tively, can the information acquired by the Comptroller!6
    office in its investigation of the taxpayer be presented
    at such proceedings without violating Art. 20.11(G), Tax.
    -Gen., V. T. C. S. ?
    The purpose of the Open Records Act, Art. 6252-17a, V. T. C. S., is to
    provide the public with access to information regarding the affairs of government
    and, to this end, its provisions   are to be construed liberally.    Subject to certain
    exceptions, the Act makes public all information collected,      assembled,   or main-
    tained by governmental bodies pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with
    the transaction of official business.    One of the exceptions is made by § 3(a)(l)
    which exempts from disclosure to the public “information        deemed confidential
    by law,~ either Constitutional,  statutory, or by judicial decision. ”
    Relevant to the exception in the Act for “information deemed confidential
    by law” ara several provisions found in Title 122A, Tax. -Gen. , V. T. C.S. (1969).
    One of these is Article 1. 031 which states:
    “(1) For the purpose of carrying out the terms
    of this Title the Comptroller   or any authorized agent
    shall have the authority to examine at the principal or
    any other office in the United States of any person,
    firm, agent, or corporation permitted to do busines
    in this State, all books, records and papers and also
    any officers or employees thereof, under oath. . . .
    The Comptroller     shall not make public or use said
    information derived in the course of said examination
    of said books, records and papers and/or officers or
    employees except for the purpose of a judicial proceed-
    ing for the collection of delinquent taxes in which the
    State of Texas is a party. . . .”
    In addition Article    20.11 (G)(l)   provides:
    “(G) Disclosure    of Information   Unlawful:
    p. 1041
    The Honorable    Robert     S. Calvert,   page 3 (H-223)
    “Examination      of Records.
    “(1) It shall be a misdemeanor   for any
    official or employee of the Comptroller      to make
    known in any manner whatever the business affairs,
    operations or information obtained by an investigation
    of records and activities of any retailer or any other
    person visited or examined in the discharge of
    official duty, or the amount or source of income,
    profits,  losses,    expenditures, or any particular
    thereof, set forth or disclosed in any return; or
    to permit. any return or copy thereof; or any book
    containing any abstract or particulars     thereof to be
    seen or exam.ined by any’person not connected with
    the Comptroller.     It
    Also’ see Articles~ 7.25,     7.26. .12.10. ,12.10A and 13.17 5 7. Taxation-General
    V. T. C. S.
    The effect of these provisions is to make certaininformation         in the
    possession of the Comptroller      confidential and thereby bring it within the
    8 3(a)(l) exception to the Open Records Act, but nowhere in them, or any
    other provision of Title 122A. is there any reference to maintaining the confi-
    dentiality of the fact of a taxpayer’s request for a redetermination        or claim
    for refund hearing.     Revelation of the fact that a taxpayer has requested a
    reconsideration    of his tax status is hardly comparable to revealing the actual
    details of his business affairs whith have been uncovered by the Comptroller
    during his investigations    and which tiill’be considered by the Comptroller
    in reaching a conclusion.      Accordinglywhile    the latter information is expressly
    made confidential by the provisions       of Title 122A, the mere fact that a hearing
    has been sought is not. Since the confidentiality        provisions of Title 122A do
    not encompass the fact that an individual has requested a redetermination            or
    claim for refund hearing. that information is made public by mandate of the
    Open Records Act, and officials or employees of the Comptroller             may disclose
    it without penalty.
    On the other hand the quoted provisions of Title 122A expressly prohibit,
    the Comptroller  from disclosing “in any manner whatever” information about
    p. 1042
    The Honorable    Robert   S. Calvert,     page 4 (H-223)
    a taxpayer’s affairs which has been obtained while examining his books, records,
    returns, etc. This information is deemed confidential by law, and $ 3(a)(l)
    excepts it from the disclosure requirements      of the Open Records Act.     But it
    is just this kind of information which the Comptroller     must consider at the
    hearings he conducts to resolve an individual’s claim for a refund or his request
    for a redetermination.     In reporting his resolution of the issues raised at these
    administrative   proceedings,   the Comptroller   must refrain from identifying the
    name of the taxpayer involved or revealing any information as to the nature of
    the taxpayer’s business operations which would serve to identify him.         In his
    decisions he must discuss the principles of law applicable to the factual situation
    in question without going into details which would make identification possible.
    But as long as he confines himself to generalities,     and the identity of the individ-
    ual taxpayer involved remains unknown, the Comptroller        may disclose the
    decisions he reaches without violating the confidentiality    provisions of Title
    122A.
    Your second question requires us to consider what effect the Open Meet-
    ings Act, Art.   6252-17, V. T. C. S. , has on the administrative  proceedings
    conducted by the Comptroller’s    Hearings Division.    In .general the Open Meet-
    ings Act requires every regular,     special, or called meeting or session of
    every governmental body to be open to the public. Section 1oftheA& defines “meet-
    ing” as follows:
    “(a) ‘Meeting’ means any deliberation
    between a quorum of members of a ,governmental
    body at which any public business or public policy
    over which the governmental body has supervision
    or control is discussed or considered,   or at which
    any formal action is taken. ” (emphasis added)
    The Comptroller’s     Hearing Division conducts hearings in order to
    consider the requests of individual taxpayers for a refund or for a redeter-
    mination of their tax status. Of necessity these proceedings must focus on
    the details of the taxpayer’s affairs; information contained in the taxpayer’s
    books, records,    and papers must be examined and discussed.
    But Articles 1. 031 and 20.11 (G)(l) of Title 122A expressly prohibit the
    Comptroller’s   office from making information about a taxpayer’s affairs public
    “in any manner whatever”.     Compliance with these provisions would be impos-
    p. 1043
    The Honorable   Robert S. Calvert,     page 5 (H-223)
    sible if the Comptroller were to open to the public the proceedings at which
    just such information was considered.    In effect, the confidentiality provisions
    of Title 122A make the administrative  proceedings conducted by the Comptroller
    private affairs insofar as they are concerned with the business, operations,
    amount of income, etc. , of individual taxpayers.
    Since these proceedings,   usually conducted by a hearing examiner
    representing the Comptroller,    do not involve “deliberation  between a quorum
    of members of a governmental body at which any public business is public
    policy. . . is discussed”,  they are not “meetings” as defined in $1 of the Open
    Meetings Act.     They need not be open to the public, and indeed the Comptroller
    should close them to the public, if necessary,     to comply with the prohibitions
    contained in Articles 1. 031 and 20.11 (G)(l) of Title 122A.
    SUMMARY
    The provisions    of Title 122A do not prohibit the
    Comptroller    from disclosing the fact that an individual
    has requested a redetermination      or claim for refund
    hearing.   While the Comptroller     may disclose his resolu-
    tion of the issues raised in the administrative    proceedings
    he conducts, he must not do so in a manner that will make
    possible identification of the individual taxpayer involved.
    The administrative     proceedings conducted by the Comp-
    troller’s  Hearings Division are not “meetings” as defined
    in the Open Meetings Act and should not be open to the
    public.
    Jours   very truly,
    u   Attorney   General    of Texas
    --
    DAVID M. KE:NDALL,          Chairman
    Opinion Committee
    p. 1044
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-223

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017