-
May 13, 1974 The Honorable Franklin L. Smith Opinion No. H- 309 County Attorney Nueces County Courthouse Re: The authority of the judge - Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 of the Court of Domestic Rela- tions of Nueces County. Dear Mr. Smith: You have asked our opinion on several questions relating to the duthority of the Court of Domestic Relations for Nueces County. Your specific questions are: “1. May the Judge of the Domestic Relations Court of Nueces County act as “Presiding Judge, I’ thereby exercising administrative jurisdiction over the judges of the numbered district courts for Nueces County? “2. Under the provisions of Article 200b, may the Judge of Domestic Relations Court of Nueces County act as “Presiding Judge” in causes pending in numbered district courts and, as such, “(a) Assign to other courts of hearing: (1) Matters for final heating. (2) Preliminary motions. (3) Pre-trial hearings. ‘l(b) Set causes for trial. “(c) Grant motions for continuance. ,pq 1393 The Honorable Franklin L. Smith page 2 (H-300) “(d) Enter any other order not dispositive of any issue germane and requisite for the entry of a final judgment in any cause. If so, what such orders may be entered (such as pleas of privilege and motions in limine) ? “(e) Preside over any hearing on any motion on a cause pending in a numbered district court a ruling of which is not dispositive of any ultimate issue in the cause. (Example: Taking of deposition before a judge under RCP 215a). ‘l(f) Issue temporary restraining orders returnable to the court in which the cause is originally filed. “(g) Qualify jurors for cases set for trial in numbered district courts, both civil and criminal. “3. Does the jurisdiction provision of Section 3, Article 2.338-10 pertaining to the Domestic Relation Court of Nueces County reading, “all cases involving justiciable controversies and differences between spouses, or between parents, or between them, or one of them, and their minor children, or between, any of these and third persons, corporations, trustees or other legal entities, which are now, or may here- after be, within the jurisdiction of the District or County Courts” “(a) Extend jurisdiction to all causes involved in suits by or against: p0 1394 . The Honorable Franklin L. Smith page 3 (H-300) (1) Married persons. (2) Parent and child. (3) Any one of these. “(b) Extend jurisdiction to probate matters, or appeals thereon, where pirties include two or more immediate members of one family. “4. Does the Domestic Relations Court of Nueces County have jurisdiction of tax suits broughtby the State or any Of its political subdivisions? “5. May the judge of the Domestic Relations Court of Nueces County preside over the general jury panel for service as jurors in all of the County and District Courts in Nueces County as provided under Article 2101, Texas Revised Civil Statutes? ” The jurisdiction of the Court of Domestic Relations for Nueces County is set out in Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, Art, 2338-10, § 3. The Sixtieth Legislature amended section 3 twice, and both are printed in the Vernon’s edition. Whether the two amendm@ 8: are treated as complementary and read together or as irreconcilable with the second amendment repealing the first, we believe that for the purpose of responding to your questions the latter amendment (Acts 1967, ch. 565, p. 1242, § 7) is an accurate and complete statement of the court’s jurisdiction. That amendment provides: “Section 3. The Court of Domestic Relations for Nueces County shall have the jurisdiction concurrent with the District Courts in Nueces County of all cases involving adoptions, removal of disability of minority and converture, wife and child desertion, delinquent, neglected or dependent child proceedings, Reciprocal p. 1395 The Honorable Franklin L. Smith page 4 (H-300) Support Act and all jurisdiction, powers and authority now or hereafter placed in the District or County Courts under the juvenile and child welfare laws of this State; and of all divorce and marriage annulment cases, including the adjustment of property rights and custody and support of minor children involved therein, alimony pending final hearing and any and every other matter incident to divorce or annulment proceedings as well as inde- pendent actions involving child custody or support of minors, change of name of persons; and all other cases involving justiciable controversies and differences between spouses, or between parents, or between them, or one of them, and their minor children, or between any of these and third persons, corporations, trustees or other legal entities, which are now, or may hereafter be, within the jurisdiction of the District or County Courts; all cases in which children are alleged or charged to be dependent and neglected children or delinquent children as provided by law, of all suits for trial of title to land and for the enforcement of liens thereon, of all suits for trial of the right of property, and said Court and the Judges thereof shall have power to issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, injunction, and all writs necessary to enforce their jurisdiction. ” Your first two questions require consideration of Article 200b, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, That article applies to certain counties, including Nueces County, and permits the election of a “presiding judge” by and from the judges of those courts having any district court jurisdic- tion. As the judge of the Court of Domestic Relations is the judge of a court hairing some jurisdiction concurrent with district court jurisdic- tion, it is our opinion he may serve as presiding judge. If permitted by local rules he may, as presiding judge: pe 1396 The Honorable Franklin L. Smith page 5 (H-300) ‘1. . . assign and transfer any case pending in any of the courts to any other of the courts; he may direct the manner in which such cases shall be filed and, docketed; he may assign any case or proceeding pending in any of the courts to the judge of any other of the courts; and he may assign the judge of any of the courts to try any case Ca hear any proceeding pending in any other of the courts. ” Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, Article 200b, $ 4(a). Under Section 2 of that Article he may hear and determine matters pending in other courts having district court jurisdiction in Nueces County. However, the judge of the Court of Domestic Relations may not act in any case which is not within the potential jurisdiction of his court. See, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, Article 200b, § 6. Your third and fourth questions are directed to the jurisdiction of the Court of Domestic Relations of Nueces County under Art. 2338-10, V. T. C. S. Although the domestic relations court is given broad jurisdic- tion, its jurisdiction is not coextensive with that of the district court. After including within that court’s jurisdiction various subject matters over which domestic relations and juvenile courts in Texas have traditionally exercised jurisdiction, the latest version of the section conferring jurisdiction upon it continues: ‘1. . and all other cases involving justiciable controversies and differences between spouses, or between parents, or between them, or one of them, and their minor children, or between any of these and third persons, corporations, trustees or legal entities which are now, or may hereafter be, within the jurisdiction of the District or County Courta;. . . . ” p. 1397 . The Honorable Franklin L. Smith page 6 (H-300) A close and literal reading of this provision by itself would support a conclusion that jurisdiction has been conferred upon the Domestic Rela- tions Court of Nueces County to hear and decide any case within the jurisdic- tion of either a district or a county court, unless all parties to the contro- versy whose interests conflict are childless, unmarried adults. However, identical statutory provisions have been interpreted as limiting the courts jurisdiction to juvenile and domestic relation matters. Rader v. Rader,
378 S.W. 2d371 (Tex. Civ. App. --Dallas 1964, writ ref’d n. r. e. ), see Pelej v. Winans,
422 S.W. 2d152 (Tex. 1967). Also see Grider v. Noonan,
438 S.W. 2d631 (Tex. Civ. App.:-Corpus Christi, 1969, no writ). Therefore, it is our conclusion that the broad language of the statute has the effect of conferring only an ancillary jurisdiction to the domestic relations court where the resolution of disputed matters is incident to the determination of issues within the court’s primary jurisdic- tion. Of course, the domestic relations court’s jurisdiction is further limited to the extent that it may not deprive the county court of probate jurisdiction assigned by the Constitution. See Elliot v. Elliot, 2,08 S. W. 2d 709 (Tex. Civ. App.--Fort Worth 1948, writ ref’d n. r. e. ). Your final question concerns the court’% duties under Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, Article 2101, which provides for interchangeable jurors. Although the general supervision of the program establishing interchangeable jurors is given to the county’s district judges, there is no such express limitation on the judge who is assigned to have supervision and control over the jurypanel. We.beSieve the judge of the Court of Domestic Relations may act in that capacity. Therefore, we answer all of your questions in the affirmative with the cayeat that the Court of Domestic Relations of Nueces County has no authority under Article 200b, V. T. C. S., to act beyond the jurisdiction granted it by Article 2338-19 $ 3, V. T. C. S. Likewise, it may not act in such a manner as to deprive the county courts of its constitutional jurisdic- tion over probate matters. These two qualifications are particularly relevant to your third and fourth questions. pe 1398 1 - The Honorable Franklin L. Smith page 7 (H-300) As each case would depend on its particular facts, it is impossible to categorically say that a particular class of cases is always within the jurisdiction of the Court of Domestic Relations of Nueces County. SUMMARY The judge of the Court of Domestic Relations of Nueces County may act as presiding judge under Article 200b, V. T. C. S., but he gains no authority to act beyond the jurisdiction granted the court in Article 2338-10, $ 3, V. T. C. S. That jurisdiction relates to juvenile and domestic relations matters and it is not coextensive with the jurisdiction of the district court. Very truly your*, Attorney General of Texas DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee p. 1399
Document Info
Docket Number: H-300
Judges: John Hill
Filed Date: 7/2/1974
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017