Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1974 )


Menu:
  •                THEA'ITORNEYGENERAL
    'OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN.    TEXAS         787ll
    February     26,    1974
    The Honorable J. W. Hughes                                  Opinion No.   H-   243
    McCulloch  County Attorney.
    P. 0. Box 108                                               Re: The proper forum for
    Brady,  Texas  7682,5                                       prosecutions under the Texas
    Water Safety Act.
    Dear Mr.    Hughes:
    You have asked whether prosecutions    for violations of the Texas Water
    Safety Act, Article 9206, Vernon’s     Texas Civil Statutes, may be filed in
    municipal court if the alleged violation occurred within the crty 1imit.s.
    Most offenses under the Texas Water Safety Act are punishable by a
    fine of two hundred dollars or less.       See $ 24 of the Act.     These offenses are
    within the jurisdiction  of the justice courts.     Article  5,  5 19,  Texas Constititutioq
    Articii~ 4.11, Vernon’.6 Texas Code of Criminal ~Procedure.            If the offense is
    committed within the territorial     limits of a city, town or village the municipal
    court normally has concurrent jurisdiction        with the justice court.      Article 1195,
    Vernon’s    Texas Civil Statutes; Article 4.14,    Vernon’s     Texas Code of Cr’immal
    Procedure.     However,   the Texas Water Safety 
    Act, supra, at 5
    25(e) provides:
    “(e) Venue for any alleged violation or offense
    under the terms and provisions     of this Act shall be in
    the justice court or county court having jurisdiction
    where such alleged violation or offense shall have been
    committed.     For any offense under this Act there shall
    be a presumption    that such offense was committed    in
    the justice precinct and county wherein the dam containing
    such body of water is located. ” (emphasis     added).
    As applied to criminal cases,   venue means the place in which prosecutions
    are to begin; jurisdiction refers to the power of the court to hear and determine
    the case.   The terms are not synonymous.     Martin v. State, 
    385 S.W.2d 260
    p.   1126
    The Honorable   J. W.   Hughes,   page 2     (H-243)
    (Tex.    Crim. 1964); Williams  v. State, 
    170 S.W. 2d
    ..48L(.Tex.   Grim.     1943).
    When there is a specific venue provision,     it prevails over a general      venue
    statute.    Trees v. State, 
    152 S.W.2d 361
    (Tex. Crim.     1941).
    While the specific venue provisions     of section 25 (2) do not divest the
    municipal court of ju risdiction of offenses under the Act committed within
    the territorial   limits of the city and punishable only by a fine which does not
    .,exceed two hundred dollars,      venue is in the justice or county court only.
    Therefore,,    any prosecutions   under the Act should be brought in the appro-
    priate justice or county court.
    SUMMARY
    Venue in~prosecutions  under the Texas Water Safety
    .Act rests exclusively in the appropriate justice or county
    court even though in some cases a municipal court may have
    concurrent  subject matter jurisdiction.
    Yours very   truly,
    u    JOHN L. HILL
    Attorney General      of Texas
    Opinion   Committee
    p.~ 1127
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-243

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017