Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1972 )


Menu:
  •         THE               AIIY)WNEY         GENERAL
    OF   TEXAS
    Hon. W. T. (Tom) McDonald, Jr.              Opinion No. M- 1140
    County Attorney
    Brazos County Courthouse                    Re:   Construction of Article
    Bryan, Texas 77801                                2340, V.C.S., and Article
    373, V.P.C., concerning
    legality of purchases of
    employees of a county
    commissioner from the
    Dear Mr. McDonald:                                latter's store.
    We have received your recent request for an opinion
    concerning the legality of purchases for the county by county
    employees from a store owned by a county commissioner and paid
    for out of county funds.
    Article 2340, Vernon's Civil-Statutes, provides:
    "Before entering upon the duties of their of-
    fice, the county judge and each commissioner shall
    take the official oath, an&shall also take a written
    oath that he will not be directly or indirectly in-
    terested in any contract with, or claim against, the
    county in which he resides, except such warrants as
    may issue to him as fees of office. Each commissioner
    shall execute a bond to be approved by the county
    judge ifithe sum of three thousand dollars, payable
    to the county treasurer , conditioned for the faith-
    ful performance of the duties of his office, that he
    will pay over to his county all moneys illegally
    paid to him out of county funds, as voluntary pay-
    ments or otherwise, and that he will not vote or
    give his consent to pay out county funds except for
    lawful purposes." (Emphasis added.)
    Article 373, Vernon's Penal Code, provides:
    “If
    LILYufficer of any county, or of any city
    a-.-    ^
    or towiiT% la11 become in any manner pecuniarily
    interested in any contracts made by such county,
    city or town, through its agents, or otherwise, for
    -5549-
    .-
    Hon. W. T. (Tom) McDonald, Jr., page 2 (M-1140)
    the construction or repair of any bridge, road, street,
    alley or house, or any other work undertaken by such
    county, city or town, or shall become interested in
    any bid or proposal for such work or in the purchase
    or sale of anythinq made for or on account of such
    county, city or town, or who shall contract for or
    receive any money or property, or the representative
    of either,-or any emolument or advantage whatsoever
    in consideration of such bid, proposal, contract,
    purchase or sale, he shall be fined not less than
    fifty nor more than five hundred dollars." (Emphasis
    added. )
    The foregoing statutes are based upon "sound public
    policy" and are designed to eliminate any conflicts of interest
    between the county and those who manage its fiscal affairs. City
    of Edinburg v. Ellis, 59 S.W.Zd 99, 100 (Tex.Comm.App. 1933);
    Attorney General's Opinions M-751 (1970) and O-1589 (1939).
    The authorities are practically unanimous to the effect
    that the officer, to be liable, must have an interest (directly
    or indirectly) in the claim against the county. A remote interest
    will not bring an officer within the statute. Attorney General's
    Opinions 344 (1939) and 6044 (1944).
    In Rigby v. State, 
    10 S.W. 760
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1889), the
    court's construction of Article 373 stated that the statute "in-
    hibits every officer of a county, city or town from selling to
    or purchasing from such corporation [county] any property what-
    ever." (Brackets added.) In accord, Bexar County v. Wentworth,
    
    378 S.W.2d 126
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1964, error ref. n.r.e.).
    It is our opinion that the purchases made for the county
    by county employees from a store owned by a county commissioner and
    paid for out of county funds result in a direct personal pecuniary
    interest of that commissioner in the purchases and violates his
    oath under Article 2340, Vernon's Civil Statutes, and also violates
    Article 373, Vernon's Penal code.
    SUMMARY
    It is a violation of Article 2340, V.C.S.,
    and of Article 373, V.P.C., for county employees
    to make purchases, paid for with county funds,
    -5550-
    Hon. W. T. (Tom) McDonald, Jr., page 3 (M-1140)
    from a store owned by a county c
    truly yours,
    Prepared by Linda Neeley
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Ben Harrison
    Bill Craig
    wardlow Lane
    Scott Garrison
    SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -5551-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-1140

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1972

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017