Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1972 )


Menu:
  •                                             i
    t
    January25, 1972
    RQnosrableWugh C. Pa*tie, Jc,   Opinion NO. M-1049
    Executive Director
    Texas Water QuaUty Board        Re:   Whether a county has
    P.O. BOX 13246                        authority to plan, aon-
    Capitol Station                       struct, operate and main-
    Austin, Texae 78711                   tain an area or regional
    waste water oolleotion
    system and to perform
    water quality management
    function,alone or in con-
    junotion with or under
    contract with one or more
    DebarMr. Yankier                      politiaat e&&visions.
    Your recent letter requests our opinion with regard
    to the following question:
    "Does a aounty, under the exietiw law,
    have authority to p&am, oonstruct, operate
    an8 maintain an a~rea81 tegional waste water
    collection end treatment 8yrtem and to per-
    form water quality managetnentfumtions, alone
    or in aonjunction with or under contract with
    one or mere other political subdivirions?"
    This request presents two questions: the first is
    whether a county has authority to plan, construct, operate and
    maintain an area or regional waet@ water collection and treat-
    ment system and to perform water quality management functions,
    alone. The second question is whether a county has the au-
    thority to do the above stated functions in conjunction with
    or under contract with one or more politic&l subdivisions.
    We will answer thr initial question first.
    Section 18 of Article V of the Constitution of Texas
    reads, in part, ae follows:
    -,5123-
    Honorable Hugh C. Yantlst page 2.    (M-i0491
    I)
    . the ~CountyCommi88ionen 80
    cho8en; ;ith the County Judge a8 presiding
    officer, ehall cornpolethe County Commia-
    sionerr Court, which ahall exercise such
    powers and juri8diction over al+ county
    busine88, as ie conferred by thin Consti-
    tution and the law8 of the State, or ae
    may be hereafter prescribed."
    St i8 well settled that this constitutional provision, rather
    than conferring on Commissioners Courts general authority over
    county business, on tiheac&tr*.nylimits that authority to that
    conferred by the statutes or Constitution. Anderson v. Wood,
    137 Tex. ;)Ol,I$2 S.W.2d 1054 (1941); Attorney General'8 Opin-
    ion No. C-722 (1966). We hold that the constitutional and stat-
    utory authority in thi8 inrtance exists.
    Furthermore, although specific constitutional author-
    ify ie not required, certain counties under Article XI, Section
    7 of the Texae Constitution have specific constitutional author-
    Ity, that is,
    "All counties and cities bordering on
    the coast of the Birrlfof Mexico are hereby
    authorized . . . to levy Mid collect euch
    tax for construction  of sea'wa118, break-
    wate=    or sanitary purposes as may now or
    mav hereafter be authorized bv law, and Slav
    create a debt for such works -ma issue bon&s
    in evidence thereof." (Emphaeie added.)
    Article 2351, Vernon's Civil Statute8,* in its relw
    uent portion, read8r
    "Each Commireioners Court ahallc
    "15. Said court 8hall have all such
    other paver8 and jurisdiction, and ahall per-
    form all 8uoh other dutiee, a8 are now or may
    hereafter be prercribed by Uv."
    All reference8 to Articles are to Vernon's Civil Statutes.
    -5124-
    Ronorable l¶ugbC. Yantis, Jr., page 3.       (M-1049)
    Article 4419-f authorizes the Commissioners Court of
    any county to appropriate and expend money for and in behalf
    of public health and sanikakisubwithin it8 oounty.
    In Attorney General's Opinion No. C-722 (1966) this
    dfice  held that Article 4419-f authorize8 a county, in the
    fudheracce  of public health and sanitation within the county,
    to use tax funds for the purpose of operating ambulance services
    in the oounty or cooperate with an incorporated city in the
    Runty in the operation of euc!hservice. This office also held
    that this article authorizes a county, in the furtherance of
    public health and sanitation, to acquire l,andfor the purpose
    of disposing of gwbhge end refuse  collected from the inhabit-
    ants of the county. Attorney General's Opinion No. O-6024
    (1944). This offioe has further held th.& this article author-
    izes a county to expend general revenuea fer the purpose of
    establishing and maintaining a prophylakfc unit, prarvidedthe
    Commissioners Court determines that this will be in furtherance
    of the public health and sanitation within the county. Attor-
    ney General's Opinion No. O-4729 (1942).
    In view of the foregoing, you are hereby advised that
    a county under the existing law &toeshave authority to plan,
    construct, operate and maintain an area or regional waste water
    collection and treatment system and to perform water quality
    iBanagemrwtfun&inns, within the county, alone;
    We now consiclsx~@EXI!
    e~cond question, namely, whether
    a county has authority t#vg&m&$ amstruat,  operate and maintain
    an area or regional waste water aollection and treatment system
    and to perform water quality management functions, in conjunc-
    tion with or under contract with one or more political subdivi-
    sions.
    Article ,2951,~@sOtfonB 19(a), 19(b)'&n6'19fc) author-
    lies Cdu&iseioners  Courts to contract with the United States
    Government, or any agency thereof, for the acquisition of land
    and to own and operate euah land, and further to bind the county
    to comply with any condition8 imposed &a a prerequisite to the
    conveyance of such land. This statute further authorizes Com-
    missioners Courts to issue bonds, to finance the aar&eftion
    of and the improvements on said lend.
    -5125-
    BaocebL%   HurjpI
    C. Yantig, J;P.#page It.        (M-1049)
    Vhe munioipal authorities or towns and
    oities, end Co¶unissionersCourts of the counties
    wherein SW    towns and cities are situated, may
    cooperate with each other in making euoh improve-
    mento . . . as said authorities and courts may
    determine neaessary to improve the public health
    and to promote efficient sanitary regulations:
    arid . . . may provide for the uenstruction of
    said improvemeats and the payment therefor."
    In Attorney Genearal'eMinion No. C-772 (1%6), this oblfiaeheld
    that this provieion authorizes a county~to oooperate with 8 aity
    &a the county in the epibs*il?ien
    of an ambulance servioe,
    Artiole 9a3-b,,pib&mended, read!4m    f,@lknas:
    "Any inoerperated oity or ta@n t . . shall
    have . . . the peter separately or jointly with
    any other city . . . and other golotlernraental
    en-
    tity, to receive and acquire . . . any property
    . . . for the follawing purpo8esr whiob are de-
    clared to be publto purposes: . . . for seviage
    plants and syetemag rights of way for water and
    sewer lines: . . . jncinerators, garbege dispos-
    al plants . . . ."
    A county is a legal subdivision of the state.     Article XI, &WC-
    tion 1, Texas Constitution.
    Article 969-b, as amended, furthar provides as follows:
    "Such city or town and suoh city, town,
    'cities, towns and counties are hereby empowered
    to maintain, improve and operate the property
    so acquired and all improvements thereon . . .
    and shall have full and ample power to jointly
    manage, control and operate such property * . .
    by entering into any contracts with each other
    on terms mutually agreeable."
    -5126-
    .
    Honorable Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., page 5.       (M-1049)
    Article 969-b continues:
    "The political subeivision or subdivirlons
    acquiring property under this Act is and are
    hereby expressly authorized and empowered to
    improve, maintain and conduct the same for the
    Qurporer hereby authorized and to make and
    provide thereon all necessary or fit improve-
    ments and facilities and to fix such reason-
    able charges . . . as the governing body or
    bodies . . . shall determine by mutual agree-
    ment . . . .'I
    Section 5 of Article 969-b provides as follows:
    "The governing body of wy euctkcity or
    town and the ConvnissionereCourt of any county
    . . . is hereby empowered to levy and collect
    a special tax for the purgose of improving,
    operating, maintaining and conducting any QroQ-
    erty"
    acquired under the provisions of this Act and
    "to provide all suitebblestructures and facili-
    ties therein..
    Section 21.088 of tbo Texas Water Code provides a8
    followe:
    "The Board may contract with local govern-
    ments, . . . to assist the Board in developing
    and preparing end from time to time revising
    water quality management plans for areas desig-
    nated by the Board."
    Section 21.088 continuesz
    "With funds provided for the purpose by
    legislative appropriation, the Board may make
    grants or interest-free loans to, or contract
    with, local governments . . . to pay adminis-
    trative or other expenses of such entities for
    developing and preparing, and from tim8 to time
    revising, water quality management glar18for
    aroaa designated by the Board.*
    Honorable Hugh C. Yards,   Jr., page 6.       (M-1049)
    Section 21.355 of the Texas Water Quality Act pro-
    vides as follows:
    "(a) A local government may execute co-
    operative agreements with the Board or other
    local governatents.
    "(1) To provide for the perfamanon of
    water quality menagement, inspotion, and en-
    forcement funds and to provide te&niaal aid
    and educational aervicee to any party to the
    agreement! and
    "(2) For the transfer of Mooneyor prop-
    erty from any party to the agreement to another
    party te the agreement for the purpose of water
    quality management, inspection, enforoement,
    technical aid and education, and the oonstruc-
    tion, ownership, Qurchaae, maintenance &nd op-
    eration of disposal systems."
    Section 21.003 of the Texas Water Code, provides
    as follows:
    "(15) 'Looal government nraans an incor-
    porated city, a oounty, a river authority, or
    a water district or authority acting under
    Article III, Section 52, or Article XVI, Sec-
    tion 59 of the Texas Constitution."
    Article Nllm,   in its relevant portions, reads as
    folkxvs:
    "Section 3. (a) Any two or more general
    purpose governmental units may join in the ex-
    ercise, performance and cooperation of plenning,
    powers, duties and functions, as provided by
    law for any or all such governmental ukits.
    When two or more such governmental unit8 agree
    . . . to cooperate in regional planning, they
    may establish a Regional Planning Commission
    . . . .
    "Seoticn 1. B 'Governmental Unit' means
    any county, city, town, village, authority,
    district or other politioal oubdivision of the
    State..
    -5128-
    .   .     .
    Honorable Hugh ,C. YEW&,    Jr., page 7.     &6-lO.49)
    Se;,:torney Ganeral'B Opinions WCS. M-928 (1971) and M-806
    .
    For the reasons statea above, aur opinicilis that a
    county has authority to p).an, ocnstruct, operate and maintain
    an area or regional waste water ccl.Iecticnand treatment sys-
    tem and to perform water quality management functiem# in ocn-
    junction with or under contract with the United States Gcvern-
    ment, or any aganay thereof , cities and towns within the county,
    other counties, Regional Planning Ccmmissior*,water districts
    OT authorities and the Texas Water Quality Board.
    SVldYlARY
    A county has authority to plan, construct,
    operate and maintain am area or regional waste
    water collection and treatment system and to
    perform water quality manage.mentfunoticns,
    within the ccunty, alone, or in conjunction
    with or under contract with the United States
    Qovernmsnt, or any agenoies thereof, cities
    ad towns within the ccw~ty, other counties,
    RtrgionalPlanning CommiWioae, water districts
    cr authorities, and the Osxas Water Quality
    Board.
    Prepared by John P. 'Praylor
    Assistant Attorney General
    -5129-
    .   .     I
    Honorable Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., page 6.   (M-1049)
    AhROVED :
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Roland Allen
    John Reeves
    Fisher Tyler
    Bob Lattimore
    SAN MCDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -5130-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-1049

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1972

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017