Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1972 )


Menu:
  • Honorable David P. Bell           Opinion   No.   M-1059
    Executive Director
    Texas Industrial Accident Board   Re:   Whether the City of Bryan
    State Finance Building                   falls under the jurisdiction
    Austin, Texas 78711                     .of the Industrial Accident
    Board when it has elected by
    its code to become self-
    insured and attempted to pro-
    vide workmen's compensation
    benefits outside the Board's
    Dear Mr. Bell:                          operation.
    The City of Bryan contends that the Texas Industrial
    Accident Board does not have jurisdiction over industrial injuries
    to employees of the City. The City's workmen's compensation code,
    in Section 1, provides that the City is not entitled to avail
    itself of the general provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act
    of the State. We do not have any information concerning when this
    section was enacted by the City. You have asked our opinion whether
    under the existing law the City falls within the jurisdiction of
    the Industrial Accident Board under the above facts.
    In 1952 Article III, Section 61, of our Texas Consti-
    tution was adopted; it authorized the Legislature to enact laws
    providing workmen's compensation insurance for municipal employees.*
    *Article III, Section 60, of the Constitution of Texas, which was
    adopted on November 6, 1962, provides:
    "Sec. 60. The Legislature shall have the
    power to pass such laws as may be necessary to
    enable all counties and other political subdivisions
    of this State to provide Workman's Compensation
    Insurance, including the right to provide its own
    insurance risk, for all employees of the county or
    political subdivision as in its judgment is necessary
    or required: and the Legislature shall provide suit-
    able laws for the administration of such insurance
    -5169-
    Hon. David P. Bell, page 2       (M-1059)
    Thereafter, Article 8309e-2, Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    concerning workmen's compensation insurance for municipal em-
    ployees was enacted by the Legislature.  Section 1 of this
    Article reads as follows:
    "Section 1. By virtue of the provision of
    Section 61, Article III, Constitution of the State
    of Texas, granting the Legislature power to pass
    such laws as may be necessary to enable all cities,
    towns, and villages of this state to provide for
    workmen's compensation insurance, including the
    right to provide its own insurance risk, for all
    city, town and village employees as in its judg-
    ment is necessary or required, and to provide for
    the administration of such insurance in the cities,
    towns, and villages, of this state, and to pro-
    vide for the payment of all costs, charges, and
    premiums on such policies of insurance and the
    benefits to be paid thereunder, provision is made
    as hereinafter set forth."
    Article 8309e-2, in Section 2, defines a "city" to mean
    any duly and legally incorporated city in the State of Texas and
    defines "Board" to mean the Industrial Accident Board of the State
    of Texas. The procedure for the payment of workmen's compensation
    benefits to city employees is set out in the statute and Section
    7 provides that all questions arising under the Act shall be
    determined by the Board.
    A municipality   is a political subdivision of the State
    in the counties or political subdivisions of this
    State and for the payment of the costs, charges
    and premiums on such policies of insurance and the
    benefits to be paid thereunder."   (Emphasis added.)
    Article III, Section 60, was amended by the inclusion in that
    Section of employees of all "political subdivisions" in the pre-
    vious language that related to only county employees.  (See
    Comment -- 1962 Amendment under Article III, Section 60, Consti-
    tution of Texas.)
    -5170-
    Hon. David P. Bell, page 3       (M-1059)
    and its incorporation embraces nothing more than the creation of
    a governmental agency which becomes invested with such powers as
    the law confers. Faulk v. City of Tyler, 389 S.W.Zd 706 (Tex.Civ.
    App. 1965, error ref. n.r.e.).
    Article XI, Section 5, of the Texas Constitution express-
    ly provides that no city charter or ordinance shall contain any
    provision inconsistent with the State Constitution or general
    laws enacted by the Legislature.  A home rule city cannot enact
    rules and regulations contrary to the Constitution and the general
    laws of the State. City of Austin v. Clendennen, 
    323 S.W.2d 158
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1959, error ref. n.r.e.).  In this case the court
    expressly held that the City of Austin was a self-insurer under
    the provisions of Article 8309e, Vernon's Civil Statutes.
    Neither the charter nor an ordinance of a city can
    legally contain anything inconsistent with the general laws en-
    acted by the Legislature.  Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort
    Worth, 
    354 S.W.2d 597
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1962), application for writ
    of error ref. n.r.e. in 
    358 S.W.2d 589
    (Tex.Sup. 1962).
    It is our opinion that the Texas Industrial Accident
    Board has jurisdiction over industrial injuries to employees of
    the City of Bryan.
    SUMMARY
    By virtue of Article 8309e-2, Vernon's Civil
    Statutes, the Texas Industrial Accident Board has
    jurisdiction over industrial injuries to employees
    of the City of Bryan.
    V        truly yoprs,
    ey General of Texas
    Prepared by Jack Sparks
    Assistant Attorney General
    -5171-
    .   .
    Hon. David P. Bell, page 4     (M-1059)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Fisher Tyler
    Melvin Corley
    Scott Garrison
    Glenn Brown
    SAM MCDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -5172-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-1059

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1972

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017