Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Dr. J. W. Edgar                    Opinion No. M-987
    Commissioner of Education
    Texas Education Agency             Re:   Authority of a school
    201 East 11th Street                     district to grant to
    Austin, Texas 78701                      a school board member
    permission to prwide
    ambulance service at
    school football games,
    Dear Dr. Edgar:                          and related question.
    Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this
    office concerning the referenced matter states, in part, as
    follows:
    "Until 1963, X funeral home, then the only
    one in West Independent School District, was per-
    mitted to have available an ambulance to serve as
    needed at home football games in West. Since
    1963, when Y funeral home opened in West, either
    x or Y has been permitted on an alternate games
    basis to have its ambulance present at local West
    high school football games. West school district
    never has directly paid for ambulance services
    rendered its athletes. . . .
    "In April, 1911, the owner-operator of X
    funeral home was elected a trustee on the West
    school board: he desires to continue in the per-
    formance of ambulance services under the alternate
    game practice basis.  Indeed, he offers while a
    trustee to so provide such service without a charge
    to anyone: the school, the insurance company, the
    parent, or the injured student. The owner-operator
    of Y home protests the acceptance or granting of
    the proposed offer as being illegal.
    -4812-
    Dr. J. W. Edgar. page 2           (M-987)
    "The Board of Trustees of the West Independent
    School District has urged that a request for an
    Attorney General's opinion be submitted on the
    following questions:
    "1 s Legally, may an independent
    school district board grant to a member
    of its school board, operator of a fun-
    eral home, . . . permission to have
    present and provide ambulance services
    as may be needed at its local school
    football games -- at no cost to the
    school, the insurance company, the parent
    of and/or the student injured in the
    activity, where competitive services are
    available and protest in the community?
    II
    .   .   .   .
    "For years prior to 1970, the local Ford deal-
    ership in West has made available (loaned) to West
    schools without charge, automobile(s) for its driver
    education program class purposes and use of school
    staff members.   In 1970, the manager of such deal-
    ership (who is stockholder therein) was elected a
    trustee of West school board. This Ford dealership
    continues the loan of automobiles for such purpose
    without charge. The district is accepting free
    loan automobile(s) for driver education program
    purposes also from the local Chevrolet dealership.
    "2 D May an independent school district
    legally accept upon loan without cost for
    driver education programs and school dis-
    trict purposes automobile(s) from a dealer-
    ship, managed and owned in Dart by a member
    of its school board --- where it accepts
    like offers from other dealerships?"
    -4813-
    Dr. J. W. Edgar, page 3          (M-987)
    A leading Texas case which passes upon the interest of
    public officials in contracts with or affecting the public body
    they represent is Meyers v. Walker, 
    276 S.W. 305
    (Tex.Civ.App.
    1925, no writ), in which the court said:
    II
    . If a public official directlv or indir-
    .   .
    ectly has a Pecuniary interest in a contract, no
    matter how honest he may be, and ~althouqh he may
    not be influenced by the intent, such a contract
    so made is violative of the spirit and letter of
    our law, and is against public policy.   (At P.
    307).  (Emphasis added).
    See also: City of Edinburq v. Ellis, 
    59 S.W.2d 99
    (Tex.Comm.
    App., 1933): Cornutt v. Clay County, 
    75 S.W.2d 299
    (Tex.Civ.
    App. 1934, no writ): and Bexar County v. Wentworth, 
    378 S.W.2d 126
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1964, error ref., n.r.e.); and generally, 47
    Tex.Jur.2d 159-161, Public Officers, Sec. 121.
    Prior Opinions of this office concerning situations
    wherein a school board member had been alleged to have an im-
    permissible conflict of interest that violates public policy
    have uniformly held that such situations violated public policy
    only where a pecuniary advantage accrued to the board member.
    Attorney General's Opinions Nos. ~-340 (1969), WW-1362 (1962),
    V-663 (1948), O-6876 (1946), o-6280 (1944), O-4000 (1941),
    O-2758 (1940). O-2306 (1940). O-1589 (1939), O-1014 (1939). and
    O-878 (1939).
    We note that the two funeral homes furnish their am-
    bulances on an alternate game basis, and that the school accepts
    loans of motor vehicles for driver education from both the Ford
    and the Chevrolet dealers. The school trustees and their compet-
    itors are treated exactly alike. Both the ambulance and the
    driver education vehicles are material aids to the public schools
    in basic spheres of their public school operation. We fail to
    discern such a substantial conflict of interest, special privi-
    lege or the exercise of undue influence relating to either of the
    school trustees as to proscribe their donation of the services of
    their vehicles to the public schools under the facts considered.
    -4814-
    Dr. J. W. Edgar. page 4             (M-987)
    No facts are presented to show any    use of official position by
    the trustee on the school board to    secure any privileges or to
    engage in any business transaction    in substantial conflict with
    the proper discharge of his duties    in the public interest.
    Accordingly, in the absence of any facts presented
    showing improper use of position or the transaction of business
    in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of duties,
    both of your questions are answered in the affirmative, and you
    are advised that the West Independent School District may accept,
    without cost, from members of its board of trustees:   (a) ambu-
    lance services as may be needed at its local school football
    games,* and (b) automobiles for use in its driver education
    program and for school district purposes.
    SUMMARY
    Under the facts stated, the West Independent
    School District may accept, without cost, from members
    of its boards of trustees:   (a) ambulance service as
    may be needed at its local football games, and (b)
    automobiles for use in its driver education program and
    for school district purposes.
    truly yours,
    General of Texas
    *    The furnishing and functioning of such ambulance service
    to the local high school football team must, of course,
    be in compliance with any and all local municipal ordin-
    ances applicable thereto. Port Arthur Indewndent Sch.
    Dist. v. City of Grwes,  
    376 S.W.2d 330
    (Tex.Sup. 1964)
    (dictum).
    -4815-
    Dr. J. W. Edgar, page 5               (M-987)
    Prepared by Austin C. Bray, Jr.
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    James McCoy
    Max Hamilton
    Rex White
    Scott Garrison
    SAM McDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRBDWALKBR
    Executive Assistant
    NOLAWHITE
    First Assistant
    -4816-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-987

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017