Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Hon. Preston Smith                     Opinion No. M- 910
    Governor of Texas
    State Capitol Building                 Re:   Authority of the Governor
    Austin, Texas 78711                          of Texas to enter Into
    certain open-end contracts
    of a stated term for com-
    puter services on behalf
    Dear Governor Smith:                         of various State agencies.
    Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this office
    concerning the referenced matter states, In part, as follows:
    “This requests your opinion as to the legality
    of my entering Into open-end services contracts of
    a stated term, on the part of the State of Texas,
    as the need for this type of contract may arise
    . . .
    “Two specific c’asesare now pending, and the
    proposed contracts are enclosed for your examlna-
    tlon. These cases Involve the purchase of computer
    operational program packages (‘software’ packages)
    by various State agencies. . . .
    “An individual agency now has the authority
    to negotiate Its own contract for such services;
    however, as Illustrated In the third enclosure to
    this letter, the pricing advantages of negotiating
    a single State contract for quantity ordering by
    all interested agencies are Immediately apparent
    . . .
    Section 10 of Article IV of the Constitution of Texas
    provides as follows:
    ‘He (the Governor) shall cause the laws to
    be faithfully executed and shall conduct, In person,
    or in such manner as shall be prescribed by law, all
    Intercourse and business .of the State with other
    States and with the United States.”
    -4426-
    Honorable Preston Smith, page 2        (M-9 10)
    The Interpretive commentary In Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    In commenting on the foregoing constitutional provision, states,
    In part, that:
    'The obligation placed by this section upon
    the governor to cause the laws to be faithfully
    executed Is, obviously, executive In nature. But
    this obligation, and the fact that the governor Is
    made the chief executive officer of the state, do
    not confer upon him any specific power. In construing
    state constitutions, the state courts have not derived,
    as has the Supreme Court of the United States with re-
    spect to the Federal Executive, any very large powers
    from such a general power or duty as to the duty to
    see that the laws be faithfully executed. The rule
    of delegated powers has been construed strictly as
    to the governor, so that he has no particular power
    unless granted to him, expressly or lmplledly.'
    (Emphasis added.)
    A recent Texas case has held that the governor has no
    prerogative powers, and that he possesses only such powers and
    duties as are vested In him by constitutional or statutory grant.
    In Calvert v. Ad,ms, 
    388 S.W.2d 742
    Tex.Clv.App.), rev'd on other
    grounds, 39b S.W.26 948 (Tex.Sup. 19i5), the court sald:
    "In 81 c.J.S. States Sec. 60, p. 982, It Is
    stated that 'The Governor has no prerogative powers,
    but possesses only such powers and duties as are
    vested In him by constitutional or statutory grant.'
    "In Constantln v..Smith, 
    57 F.2d 227
    , D.C.,
    E.D. Tex., appeal dlsmlssed Sterling v. Constantln,
    
    287 U.S. 378
    , 
    53 S. Ct. 190
    , 
    77 L. Ed. 375
    , the Court
    quoted with approval the following statement from
    Herllgy v. Donohue, 
    52 Mont. 601
    , 
    161 P. 164
    , L.R.A.
    1917B, 702 Ann.Cas. 1917C, 29: '(t)he Governor Is
    at all times amenable to the Constltutlon and laws
    of the state. They are the charters of his powers,
    and In them he must find the authority for his of-
    ficial acts."' 388 S.W.2d at p. 747.
    Neither our Constitution nor statutes provide, either
    expressly or by necessary Implication, for you to enter into con-
    tracts, such as those submitted with your letter, on behalf of
    various State agencies.
    -4427-
    Honorable Preston Smith, page 3            (M-910)
    Your question, accordingly, Is answered In the negative.
    SUMMARY
    There exists no authorization, either in the
    Constitution or the statutes of the State of Texas,
    for the Governor to enter Into, on behalf of various
    State agencies, certain open-end contracts of a stated
    term for the furnishing of services of computer
    operational program packages.
    Prepared by Austin C. Bray, Jr.
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Rex White
    Jim Swearlngen
    Bob Lattlmore
    Sally Phillips
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WRITE
    First Assistant
    -4428-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-910

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017