Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1970 )


Menu:
  •                                    February     16, 1970
    Honorable Ward P. Casey                                      Opinion      No. M- 578
    County Attorney
    Ellis  County Courthouse                                     Re:      Discretion       of county clerk
    Waxahachle,  Texas   75165                                            to refuse      to perform the
    duties     relating    to declara-
    tions of informal        marriage,
    as set forth        in Section
    1.92(c)(d)       of the Texas
    Dear Mr. Casey:                                                       Family Code.
    Your recent    letter            requests our opinion relative  to
    that    portion    of Section    1.92           of the Texas Family Code, as follows:
    "Does the County Clerk have the discretion
    under Section    1.92,     subsections     (c) and (d) to
    refuse   to administer      the oath to the partle,s,,
    execute   his certificate       on the declaration,       or
    record   the declaration       and deliver     the original
    of the declaration       to the parties       and transmit
    a copy to the Bureau of Vital          Statistics;     where
    there Is no legal      impediment to marriage appearing
    on the face of the form and all of the informaiion
    required    to be given on the form Is furnished?
    Section 1.92 of the Texas Family Code (Acts 1969, 61st
    Leg.,    R.S.,     ch. 888, p. 2706), provides,  In part, as follows:
    "(b)         The declaration         form    shall      contain:
    It
    .    . .
    “(6)         a certificate      of    the    county      clerk
    that the applicant made the oath and the place
    and date It was made.
    "(c) The county clerk shall:
    "(1) determine that all necessary in-
    formation is entered on the form;
    -2757-
    .   -..
    Hon. Ward P. Casey,           page 2      (M-578)
    “(2)      administer      the   oath     to each   party;
    ave each party            sign     the declaration
    in hii(z!es:nce    ; and
    “(4)      execute   his    certificate       on the declara-
    tion.
    “(d)     The county clerk     shall record   the declara-
    tion,    deliver   the original    of the declaration    to the
    parties,     and transmit    a copy to the Bureau of Vital
    Statistics.      ” (Emphasis added. )
    The language of Section         
    1.92(c)(d), supra
    , clearly
    Indicates      that the duties      of the county clerk       in administering
    the oath,      executing    his certificate,       recording   the declaration,
    delivering      the original      of the declaration       to the parties,     and
    transmitting       a copy of the declaration          to the Bureau of Vital
    Statistics      are mandatory,      not discretionary.        In setting    forth
    the above      duties,    Section   1.92(c)(d)     speaks in terms of “shall”
    not “May,”        “Shall”   is to be given a mandatory effect.             53 Tex.
    Jur.2d 30,      Statutes,     Sec. 16.
    Other relevant     provisions   of the Texas statutes     ap-
    plicable  to the general    duties    of county clerks  as recorders
    of instruments  are:    Article    lq411 which provides   as follows:
    “They (county   clerks)    shall be ex-officio
    recorders   for their    several   counties,    and as
    such shall record     In suitable     books to be pro-
    cured for that purpose all deeds, mortgages and
    other instruments     required    or permitted    by law
    to be recorded,      . . .“(Emphasis      added.)
    Article     6591 reads:
    “County clerks     shall be the recorders       for
    their   respective    counties;     they shall provide
    and keep in their      offices     well bound books In
    which they shall record         all instruments     of
    writing    authorized   or required      to be recorded
    ‘inthe county clerk’s        off1      i   th
    hereinafter     provided." (BzEhaiis          Ed!%nTr
    ' All Articles referenced are to Vernon's Civil Statutes, unless
    otherwise noted.
    -2758-
    Hon. Ward P. Casey,        page 3 (M-578)
    Further,     Article    6594 provides:
    "When any Instrument         of writing    authorized
    by law to be recorded         shall be deposited       in the
    county clerk's     office     for record,     if the same is
    acknowledged     or proved in the manner prescribed
    by law for record,        the clerk    shall enter in a
    kt    b        Id      f      ht                in alphabetical
    &,'thE        ````s E; t:z ~a,"ti~'!%"~ate             and nature
    thereof,    and the time of delivery          for record;    and
    shall give to the person depositing              the same, If
    required&    a receipt     specifying    the particulars
    thereof.      (Emphasis added.)
    Lastly,     Article     6595 provides:
    "Each recorder     shall,    without delay,         record
    every instrument       of writing     authorized      to    be
    recorded    by him, which is deposited           with      him for
    record,    with the acknowledgments,          proofs,       affl-
    davits    and certificates       thereto   attached.          . . .I'
    ‘(Emphasis added.)
    The court      in Turrentine   v. Lasane, 
    389 S.W.2d 336
    (Tex.Clv.App.   1965,      no writ),   at page 337, stated that:
    "It is the duty of the county clerk to
    record    all deposited   written   Instruments  au-
    thorized,     required  or permitted    t be re-
    corded In his office."        (Emphasis'added.)
    The duties     of a recording   officer    are ministerial.       First
    Nat. Bank v:..McElroy,       
    112 S.W. 801
    (Tex.Civ.App.        1908, no writ).
    %lnisterial"     duties     have been described      as follows:
    "It Is said that an official         duty is 'mlnis-
    terial'     when it is absolutely       certain    and imper-
    ative,     involving     merely the execution      of a set
    task,    and when the law which Imposes It prescribes
    and defines       the time, mode and occasion         of Its per-
    formance with such certainty          that nothing remains
    for judgment or discretion.           Official     action   Is
    ministerial       when It is the result      of performing
    a certain      and specific    duty arising     from fixed
    and designated        facts.   A ministerial      act is one
    which public       officials   are required     to perform
    upon a given state of facts          In a prescribed      manner,
    -2759 -
    I   .
    Hon. Ward P. Casey,         page 4   (M-578)
    in obedience   to the mandate of legal authority
    and without regard to their     own judgment or
    opinion  concerning  the propriety    or Impropriety
    f the act to be performed."      Case v. Daniel C.
    g-4,                             82b (N.J. Super.
    959) .  (EmphAsis aidEd.)
    See also,    the various definitions     of "ministerial     act!' and
    "ministerial    duty" in Black's     Law Dictionary    (4th Ed. 1951),
    page 1148, and in 27 Words and Phrases (Perm.Ed.            1961) pages
    374-404.
    In view of the foregoing,         It is our opinion    that,
    where all of the information          required   to be given on the form
    is furnished,      neither   the county clerk,      nor his deputies,     have
    any discretion      to refuse     to perform the duties    set forth    in
    Section   
    1.92(c)(d), supra
    .
    Accordingly,     your   question   is    answered    in the   negative.
    SUMMARY
    Neither   county clerks,      nor their deputies,
    have discretion     to refuse    to perform the duties
    set forth   in Section    1.92(c)(d),    Texas Family
    Code, relating     to declarations     of informal
    marriage,   where all information       required   to be
    given on the form is furnished.
    Vedtruly        yours,
    General       of Texas
    Prepared    by Austin   C. Bray,     Jr.
    Assistant    Attorney   General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor,   Chairman
    W. E. Allen,   Acting Co-Chairman
    Malcolm Quick
    Jack Sparks
    Jim Swearingen
    David Longoria
    -2760-
    Hon. Ward P. Casey,     page 5 (M-578)
    MEADEF. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -2761-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-578

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1970

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017