Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1968 )


Menu:
  • Hon. Marjorie Taber Ogle            Opinion No. M-258
    Executive    Secretary
    Board of Vocational Nurse           Re:   Authority of the Board of
    Rxaminers                               Vocational Rurse Examiners
    1008 Sam Houston Building                 to place an additional
    Austin, Texas 78701                       charge upon candidates for
    re-examination, and to in-
    crease the application fees
    Dear Mrs. Ogle:                           for reciprocity candidates.
    You have requested the opinion of this office re,gard-
    ing the above matters. In this connection you have provided us
    with the following information:
    "I-LB.1238 passed by the 60th Legisla-
    ture, Regular Session, amended Section 9
    of the Vocational Nurse Act (Article 4528``
    Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) to increase
    the application and examination fee from
    $10 to $15.
    Yhe purpose for this increase in fee
    is to offset the additional expense of ,a,d-
    ministering the State Board Test Pool examtna-
    tion which this Board proposes beginning with
    the October, 1968 examination. It is estimated
    that such additional expense to the agency will
    amount to at least $5 per candidate.
    "Our law as It is amended will take care
    of    testing for all new candidates; howver,
    we    ask your opinion as to whether we WOUld
    be    authorized under the Vocational Nurse Act
    to    charge an additional $5 for failures, past
    - 1250-
    Mrs. Marjorie Taber Ogle, page 2   (M-258)
    or future, who desire to rewrite the ex-
    amination. This type candidate requires
    the same expense as would a first-time can-
    didate.
    "Also, we would like to know if we
    would be authorized to charge a $15 applica-
    tion fee for reciprocity candidates seeking
    license in Texas which amount would be com-
    parable to the fee charged Texas nurses.
    Reciprocity applicants are not generally
    required to write examination again in
    Texas. They now pay $10."
    An administrative agency of the State has only the
    power that is conferred upon it by the Legislature, and the
    question df what may be charged by the Board is determinsble
    only by examination of the particular authority delegated by
    the Legislature. Section 9, Article 4528c, Vernon's,Civil
    Statutes, provides, in part, as follows:
    Yhe following shall be the fees charged
    by the Board under this Act: application and
    examination fee, Fifteen Dollars ($15): fee
    of Ten Dollars ($10) for licensing existing
    Vocational Nurses in accordance with Section
    6 hereof; annual renewal fee, Two Dollars ($2);
    penalty for late annual renewal fee, Two Dol-
    lars ($2); fee for license by reciprocity,
    Ten Dollars ($10); fee for accrediting train-
    ing programs, Twenty-five Dollars ($25).
    You are therefore advised that it is the opinion
    of this office that the Board does not have the authority
    to charge an additional $5 for failures who desire to re-take
    the examination for licensing. However, we would point out
    that if, pursuant to the power of the Board to make rules
    and regulations under Section 4(b), Article~4528c, the Board
    were to adopt a rule requiring a new application from persons
    -   1251-
    .        -
    Mrs. Marjorie Taber Ggle, page 3 (M-258)
    desiring to re-take the examination, the $15 fee required
    by Section 9 would be again payable.
    With regard to your question concerning an in-
    crease in the application fee for reciprocity candidates
    seeking license in Texas, your attention is directed to
    the specific provisions of Section 
    9, supra
    , whereby the
    Legislature has adopted a $10 fee for such licensing. The
    Board has no authority to vary the license fee so established.
    SUMMARY
    The various fees collectible by the Board
    of Vocational Nurse Rxaminers are established
    by Sec. 9, Art. 4528~. V.C.S. The Board may
    neither increase nor vary these established
    fees. The Board may, by proper rule or regula-
    tion, require a new application, together with
    fee, from persons desiring to re-take the pro-
    fessional examination.
    truly yours,
    cz7-
    . MARTIN
    ney General of Texas
    Prepared by Malcolm L. QuiCk-'
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman
    Kerns Taylor, Co-Chairman
    Fisher Tyler
    Alan Minter
    Richard Choate
    Wardl~owLane
    A. J. CARUBBI, JR.
    Executive Assistant
    -1252-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-258

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1968

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017