Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1968 )


Menu:
  • Hon. Joe Resweber                   Opinion No. M- 223
    County Attorney                                    in
    Harris County Courthouse            Rer Authority of the Harris
    Houston, Texas 77002                     County Hospital District
    to sped public funds to
    pay transportationand
    other costs for recruit-
    ing and int0rviewing
    prospectiveemployees
    Dear Mr. Resweberz                       and related question.
    You havq requested this office.to issue~a legal
    opinion on the following two questioner
    "'1. Can the Harris Hospital District
    spend public funds to pay transportationand
    other costs for the purpose of recruiting and
    interviewingprospectiveemployees?
    “‘2.
    Does the Hospital District have
    the authority to spend public funds to pay
    moving and other cwta for moving employees...
    hired by the Administrator?@"
    Your quastion No. 1.                   _
    The Harris County Hospital District was created under
    the prwisions of Article 4494n, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Sec-
    tion 5 of saia Article provides for inBoard of Hospital Managers
    who "shall aDdnt a qeneral manager (administrator)who 'shall
    supervise ali-of the-work and activities of,the District, and
    have general direction of the affaira of the District. . . . I”
    It further provides that the Board of Managers shall have the
    authority to employ such doctora, nurses, techniciansand other
    employaes of every kind ana character as msy be aavisable for
    -1068-
    Hon.   Joe Resweber, page 2 (~-223)
    the efficient operation of the hospital system." By virtue
    of the express power of the Board of Hospital Managers to hire
    necessary personnel, it has the implied power to do what is
    reasonable and necessary to perform such duty. This office has
    unifotiy stated that the determinationof what constitutes
    reasonable and necessary expenses is a question of fact and
    is to be determined, in the first instance,by the state agency
    involved. Attorney  General's Opinions Nos. O-995 (19391, +3670
    (1941) and V-607 (1948).
    This office ii Attorney General's Opinion O-6766
    (1945) statea that a member of the Board of the Texas State
    Library and Historic61 Commission,when authorized by the Board
    to interview applicants for the position of State Librarian,
    would be engaged in "State business*'when traveling for that
    purpose.
    It is therefore our opinion that the Harris County
    Hospital District, if it finds that it is reasonable and nec-
    essary in order to secure its required staff, may pay trans-
    portation and other traveling expenses of its personnel when
    traveling for the purpose of recruiting and interviewing
    prospectiveemployees.
    We point out, hwever,  that the Hospital District is
    not authorized to pay the traveling expenses of applicants for
    positions in the hospital. The trips to Houston by prospective
    employees for the purpose of being interviewedwould not con-
    stitute "State business" as they are neither egents or employees
    of the Hospital District. The payment of euch traveling expense
    would constitute the granting of public money or thing of value
    to an individual,which is expressly prohibitedby Section 52
    of Article III of the Texas Constitution. Accord, Attorney Gen-
    eral's Opinion O-6766 (1945).
    Your queetion No. 2.
    We can find no provision in Article 4494n, Vernon's
    Civil Statutes, authorieing the Hospital District to spend
    public funas to pay moving and other costs for moving employees
    hired by the District. In Attorney General's Opinion O-4537
    (1942) it was held that the Texas National Guard Armory Board
    -1@59-
    Hon. Joe Resweber, page 3 (M-223)
    was not authorized to pay the expenses of its Secretary in
    moving personal household effects from one city to another.
    The Constitution of Texas expressly prohibits any
    political subaivision of the State:to lend its credit or grant
    public money or thing of value in aid of any individual. Tex.
    Const. Art. III, Sec. 52. Unless compensationis provided by
    law for an official service required to be performed, and the
    amount fixed by law, none can lawfully be charged ,therefor.
    Nueces Countv v. Currinston. 
    139 Tex. 297
    , 162 S.W.Zd 687 (1942).
    By virtue of the above authoritieswe.answer your
    second question in the negative.
    SUMMARY
    The Harris County Hospital District may
    spend public money to pay the reasonable ana
    necessary travel expenses of its personnel in
    recruiting and interviewing prospectiveemployees.
    The Hospital District is not authorized to
    pay the traveling expenses, to Houston or else-
    where, of applicants for positions in the hospital.
    The Hospital District is not authorized to
    spend public money to pay moving and other costs
    for mwing employees hired by ths District. Sec-
    tion 52 of Article III, Texas Constitution. At-
    torney,General's Opinion O-4537 (1942).
    truly yours,
    !h    lLi2EL
    C. MARTIN
    ney General of Texas
    Prepared by Jack Sparks
    Assistant Attorney General
    - 1070 -
    .   -
    Hon. JOT Resweber, page 4 m-223)
    APPRWRD   I
    OPINION CCMMITTER
    Hawthorne Phillips, Chairum
    Kerns Taylor, Co-Cheirnmn
    W. V. Oeppert
    W. 0. Shultz
    Ralph Ra.sh
    John Grace
    A. J. CARUBBI, JR.
    Executive Assistant
    -1071-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-223

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1968

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017