Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1966 )


Menu:
  • Honorable William D. Pratt    Opinion No. C-754
    County Attorney
    Palo Pinto County             Re: Validity of Ordinance
    Mineral Wells, Texas              of the City of Mineral
    Wells which makes it
    unlawful to sell alco-
    holic beverages on
    Sunday in the city
    Dear Mr. Pratt:                   limits.
    You recently requested an bpinion of this of-
    fice concerning the validity of the following ordinance
    adopted by the City of Mineral Wells making it unlawful
    to sell beer or any alcoholic beverage on Sunday In the
    city limits of Mineral Wells, Texas.
    The pertinent parts of the ordinance are as
    follows:
    “4. It shall be unlawful for any
    person to directly or indirectly sell,
    offer for sale, barter, offer to barter,
    exchange, or offer to exchange, give, or
    offer to give, deliver, or offer to de-
    liver, serve, or offer to serve, beer
    or any alcoholic beverage, by retail
    for consumptionon or off the premises,
    within the corporate limits of the City
    of Mineral Wells, in Palo Pinto County,
    Texas, between the hours of 1:00 A.M.
    of any Sunday and 7~00 A.M. of the fol-
    lowing Monday morning.
    “5. Any person violating any pro-
    vision of this Ordinance shall be guilty
    of a misdemeanor,and upon conviction
    shall be punished by a fine of not less
    than $25.00, and not more tha.n$200.00,
    and each day of such violation shall
    constitutea separate offense."
    The authority of cities to regulate the sale of
    beer is found In Article 667-10 l/2, Vernon's Penal Code.
    -3623-
    -     .
    Honorable Willlam D. Pratt, Page 2 (C-754)
    The pertinent part of such statute Is as follows:
    "All Incorporated cities and towns
    are hereby authorized to regulate the
    sale of beer within the corporate llm-
    its of such cities and towns by charter
    amendment or ordinance,and may thereby
    prescribe the opening and closing hours
    for such sales; such cities and towns
    may also designate certain zones in the
    residential section or sections of said
    cities and towns where such regulations
    for opening and closing hours for the
    sale of beer sha,llbe observed or where
    such sales may be prohibited. All in-
    corporated cities and towns and all Com-
    missioners Courts when acting under au-
    thority of this section are hereby au-
    thorized In adopting charter amendments,
    ordinances, or orders to distinguishbe-
    tween retailers selling beer for consump-
    tion bn the premises where sold and those
    retailers, manufacturersor distributors
    selling not for consumptionon the prem-
    ises where sold, and to provide for
    separate and distinct regulations.Noth-
    ing herein shall authorize any incorporated
    city or town to extend by ordinance or
    charter the hours of sale as fixed by the
    state law."
    The foregoing statute gives cities the authority
    to shorten the hours of sale of beer as fixed by State law.
    The statute f,urthergives cities the authority to prohibit
    the sale of beer in a particulararea.   Moore v. McCarver,
    240 S.W.2d ~443 (Tex.Clv.App.1951).
    State law pr6hlblts the sale of beer on Sunday
    at any time between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A. M. and
    1:00 o’clock   P.M., and on any day except Sunday at any time
    prior to 7:00 o'clock A.M. Article     667-10, V.P.C. The
    punishment prescribed by State law for selling beer with-
    in the prohibited hours Is a fine of not less than $100.00
    and not more than $l,OOO.OO, or by Imprisonment in the
    county jail for not more than one year, or by both such
    fine and Imprisonment. Article 667-26, V.P.C.
    -3624-
    -.         -
    Honorable William D. Pratt, Page 3 (c-754)
    A city ordinance that prescribesa different and
    lesser nunlshmentthan that fixed bJrthe State law for the
    same uniiwful act Is void. Ex part; Wataon;~225S.W.2d
    850 (Tex.CrIm.1949).
    The Court of Criminal Appeals, In Young v. State,
    
    267 S.W.2d 423
    (Tex.Crlm.195&), declared a city ordinance
    of the City of McGregor, which was very similar to the
    ordinance before us, void because It attempted.toprovide
    a lesser punishmentthan provided by State law for selling
    beer on Sunday between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and
    1~00 o'clock P.M. and on Monday prior to 7~00 o'clock A.M.
    The Court recognized the right and authorityof the City
    to prohibit by ordinance the sale of beer on Sunday from
    1:00 o'clock P.M. to midnight on Sunday, but struck down
    the entire ordinancebecause it included hours on Sunday
    and Monday that were prohibited by State law with a greater
    penalty than provided in the ordinance.
    The Young 
    case, supra
    , Is squarely itipoint with
    the question before us, and therefore the Mineral Wells
    Ordinance submitted to us is void for the reasons set forth
    in such case.
    SUMMARY
    A city ordinance that prescribesa
    differentand lesser punishmentfor
    selling beer during prohibitedhours
    than that fixed by Article 667-10, V.
    P.C., for the same unlawful act is void.
    Yours very truly,
    WAGGONER CARR
    Attorney General of Texas
    By:
    Assistant Attorney General
    DIiC/br
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTJ3E
    -3625
    Honorable Wllllam D. Pratt, page 4 (C-754)
    W. 0. Shultz, Chairman
    tinny Zwiener
    Charlee Swanner
    Halcolm Qulak
    Pat Bailey
    APPROVEDFORTHEATTORNEY   GENERAL
    By: T. B. Wright
    -3626-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-754

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1966

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017