Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1966 )


Menu:
  •             E            NE
    EXAS
    February 17, 1966
    Honorable Charles A. Allen          Opinion NO. c-615
    Criminal District Attorney
    Harrison County                     Re:   Whether Harrison'County Is
    Marshall, Texas                           authorized to employ a
    secretary for the juvenile
    officer pureuant to the
    provisions of Article 51395,
    Vernon's Civil Statutes, and
    Dear Mr. Allen:                           related question.
    You have requested, by your letter and subsequent tele-
    phone conversations with this office, the opinion of this office
    as to whether Harrison County Is authorized, pursuant to the pro-
    visions of Article 51395, Vernon's Civil Statutes, to employ a
    secretary for the juvenile officer, and if so, may the salary of
    such secretary exceed the salary provisions of Article 51395.
    In connection'wlth the foregoing you have stated In
    your lettersthat:
    "In 1964 the Commissioners Court of
    Harrison County authorized the employment
    of a secretary for the Junveile Officer of
    Harrison County. Prior thereto, an agree-
    ment was worked out with the State Department
    of Public Welfare whereby among other things
    the State Department of Public Welfare would
    appoint a Child Welfare Caseworker, who, In
    turn, would be designated by the Juvenile
    Board (composed of the District and County
    Judge) as Juvenile Officer. . . .
    n
    . . .
    "The Department of Public Welfare now
    inaiats that the secretary, ,who is paid by
    the County but qualified by the Department
    of Public Welfare, be paid on the merit
    system. If the Commissioners' Court of
    -2988-
    Hon. Charles A. Allen, page 2   (C-615)
    Harrison County complies with the request
    of the Departmentof Public We.lfare;the
    amount expended would exceed $3,500, the
    amount authorized by Article 5139J, which
    is the amount originally agreed upon by
    Harrison County."
    Section 3a of Article 51395 provides in part that:
    "The juvenile board of Harrison County
    may appoint a juvenile officer, whose salary
    shall be fixed by the Commissioners Court of
    said county in an amount not to exceed Three
    Thousand Dollars ($3,000) per year, and whose
    llowance'for expenses shall not exceed Five,
    &ndred Dollars ($500) per year. . . .The
    Commissioners Court shall provide the necessary
    funds for payment of the salary and expenses of
    the juvenile officer." (Emphasis added).
    While the provisions of Section 3a of Artic&e 51395
    authorize the Harrison County Juvenile Board to appoint a
    juvenile officer whose salary shall be fixed by the Commis-
    sioners Court in an amount not to exceed $3,000.00 per year
    and whose expense allowance shall not exceed $500.00 per year,
    we are of the opinion that Section 3a of Article  51395 does
    not authorize the Harrison County Juvenile Board or the
    Commissioners Court of Harrison County to either employ or
    compensate a secretary for the juvenile officer. The
    authorization found in Section 3a of Article 51395 is
    limited to the employment and compensation of a juvenile
    officer and does not provide for the employment or compensa-
    tion of other personnel who may'work in conjunction with the
    juvenile officer. Such conclusion in construing the powers
    of the Commissioners Court oursuant to the orovisions of
    Section 3a of Article 513 J'is in harmon with such cases
    as Canales 71.Laughlin, 1z 
    7 Tex. 169
    , 21% S.W.2d 451 (198);
    Childress County v. State, 
    127 Tex. 343
    , 
    92 S.W.2d 1011
    (1936); and Roper v. Hall, 
    280 S.W. 289
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1925).
    In connection with the foregoing it should be noted,
    however, that while Section 3a of Article 51395 does not
    authorize the employment or compensation of anyone other
    than a juvenile officer, Section 39 and Section A0 of
    Article 6 5c,.Vernon's Civil Statutes, the Public Welfare
    Act of 19;:
    1, provide that:
    -2989-
    ,
    Hon. Charles A. Allen, page 3 (c-615)
    “Sec. 39. No provision of this Act is
    intended to release the counties and munici-
    palities in this State from the speCific respon-
    sibillty which is currently borne by those
    counties and municipalities in support of
    public welfare, child welfare, and relief
    services! Such funds which'may hereafter
    be appropriated'by the counties and munici-
    palities for those services may be administered
    through the county or district offices of the
    State De artment ,&ate Department of Public
    Welfare , and if so administered, shall be
    devote% exclusively to the services in the
    county or municipality making such appropria-
    tion.
    "Sec. 40. County Child Welfare Boards
    established,or hereinafter appointed in con-
    formity with Section ~4, Acts of 1931, Forty-
    second Le islature, pa e 323, Chapter 194
    Section & of Article t 94a, Vernon's Civil
    ii-
    tatuteg, shall function and/or continue
    to function as provided therein, and the
    Commissioners Court of any county may ap-
    propriate funds from its general funds, or
    any other available fund, for the adminis-
    tration of such County Child Welfare Boards
    and provide for services to and suppart of
    children in need of protection and/or care."
    (Emphasis added).
    Pursuant to the foregoing provisions, and the conclusions
    reached in Attorney General's Opinions No. O-5943 (1944) and
    No. 0-6335 (lg&), it would appear that the Commissioners
    Court of a county would be authorized to employ such
    personnel as it deemed necessary to provide for services to
    and support of children in need of protection and/or c.areand
    compensate such persons so employed in any amount deemed
    reasonable and proper by the Commissioners Court. fin addition,
    if an individual employed by the Commissioners Court, pursuant
    to Section 39 and Section 40 of Article 695c, had as one of
    his or her duties the task of acting as secretary to the
    juvenile officer of the county, we are of the opinion that
    this duty would be within the authorization of Section 39
    and Section 40 of Article 695c, as the responsibilities of
    the county juvenile officer certainly include servieesto
    children in need of protection and/or care.
    -2990-
    Hon. Charles A. Allen, page 4 (c-615)
    The provisions of SeCtion3a~of'Article
    51395, Vernon's Civil Statutes, do not au-
    thorize the Harrison County Juvenile Board or
    the Commiesionetrs Court of Harrison County to
    either employ'or compensate a secretary for
    the juvenile  officer.
    However the provisions of Section 39
    and Section 40 of Article 695c, Vernon's Civil
    Statutes, would authorize the Commissioners
    Court to employ such persons as it deemed
    necessary  to provide for services to and
    support of children in need of protection
    end/or care, and compensate such persons
    in any amount deemed reasonable and'proper
    by the Commissioners Court. In turn, a per-
    son so employed pursuant to Section 39 snd
    Section 40 of Article 695c, could have as
    one of his or her duties the task of acting
    as secretary to the juvenile officer.
    Very truly yours,
    WAGQORER CARR
    Assistant
    PB:mkh:sj
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    John Reeves
    Roy Johnson
    John Banks
    Edward Moffett
    APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GERERAL
    BY: T. B. Wright
    -2991-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-615

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1966

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017